Trajectories of early secondary insults correlate to outcomes of traumatic brain injury: results from a large, single centre, observational study

Paola Cristina Volpi, Chiara Robba, Matteo Rota, Alessia Vargiolu, Giuseppe Citerio, Paola Cristina Volpi, Chiara Robba, Matteo Rota, Alessia Vargiolu, Giuseppe Citerio

Abstract

Background: Secondary insults (SI), such as hypotension, hypoxia, and intracranial hypertension frequently occur after traumatic brain injury (TBI), and have a strong impact on patients' clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine the trajectories of SI from the early phase of injury in the prehospital setting to hospital admission in a cohort of TBI patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, single centre study on consecutive patients admitted from 1997 to 2016 to the Neuro Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at San Gerardo Hospital, in Monza, Italy. Trajectories of SI from the prehospital to hospital settings were defined as "sustained", "resolved", "new event", and "none". Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to correlate SI trajectories to a 6-months outcome.

Results: Nine hundred sixty-seven patients were enrolled in the final analysis. About 20% had hypoxic or hypotensive events and 30.7% of patients had pupillary abnormalities. Hypotension and hypoxia were associated with an unfavourable outcome when "sustained" and "resolved", while pupillary abnormalities were associated with a poor outcome when "sustained" and as "new events". After adjusting for confounding factors, 6-month mortality strongly correlated with "sustained" hypotension (OR 11.25, 95% CI, 3.52-35.99), "sustained" pupillary abnormalities (OR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.51-5.2) and "new event" pupillary abnormalities (OR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.16-6.76).

Conclusions: After TBI, sustained hypotension and pupillary abnormalities are important determinants for patients' outcomes. Early trajectories define the dynamics of SI and contribute to a better understanding of how early recognition and treatments in emergency settings could impact on 6-month outcomes and mortality.

Keywords: Outcome; Prehospital insults; Secondary injuries; Trajectory; Traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical requirements were fulfilled, accordingly to “Decreto Legge 196”, article 4 (2003). Due to the retrospective data analysis and the de-identification of sensible data, no consent was required and no consent was required for data utilization. Ethical Committee and the hospital data protection office approved data utilization and publication.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Smooth function of hypoxia, hypotension and pupillary abnormalities at the scene of the accident (panel a) and age at trauma (panel b) in TBI patients admitted during the study period
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of trajectories of hypoxia, hypotension, and pupillary reactivity in TBI patients admitted to San Gerardo Hospital NICU during the study period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differences in oxygenation (SpO2, Box Plot a) and mean arterial pressure (MAP, Box Plot b) across trajectories of hypoxia and hypotension. Box shows the interquartile range and the inner horizontal bold line indicates the median. Whiskers extend the median by ±1.5 times the interquartile range, while dotted points extending beyond the end of the whiskers represents outliers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of 6-month outcome measured by GOS (4–5 = Favourable, 1–3 = Unfavourable) in trajectories of hypoxia, hypotension, and pupillary reactivity
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Confidence interval plot of trajectories of hypoxia, hypotension, and pupils in relation to 6-month functional state (a) and 6-month mortality (b). Horizontal lines represent the 95% conficence interval (CI). Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, intubation on the scene, sedation on the scene, GCS at the ED, CT classification, presence of SAH, and extracranial lesions

References

    1. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, Andelic N, Bell MJ, Belli A, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987–1048. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X.
    1. Tramonti F, Bonfiglio L, Di Bernardo C, Ulivi C, Virgillito A, Rossi B, et al. Family functioning in severe brain injuries: correlations with caregivers’ burden, perceived social support and quality of life. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(8):933–939. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1009380.
    1. Maas AIR, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Teasdale SGM, Steyerberg EW. Prognosis and clinical trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury: the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):232–238. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0024.
    1. Majdan M, Lingsma HF, Nieboer D, Mauritz W, Rusnak M, Steyerberg EW. Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six month outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22:68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0068-9.
    1. Spaite DW, Hu C, Bobrow BJ, Chikani V, Barnhart B, Gaither JB, et al. The effect of combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia on mortality in major traumatic brain injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(1):62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.007.
    1. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GWJ, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6–15.
    1. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, Steyerberg EW, Lu J, Mushkudiani N, et al. Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):287–293. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0031.
    1. Citerio G, Stocchetti N, Cormio M, Beretta L. Neuro-link, a computer-assisted database for head injury in intensive care. Acta Neurochir. 2000;142(7):769–776. doi: 10.1007/s007010070091.
    1. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet Lond Engl. 1974;2(7872):81–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0.
    1. Nolan J, Soar J. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation Council (UK). 2015. . Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
    1. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum CM, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S287–S292.
    1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009.
    1. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet Lond Engl. 1975;1(7905):480–484. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5.
    1. Brazinova A, Rehorcikova V, Taylor MS, Buckova V, Majdan M, Psota M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe: a living systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2016;25.
    1. Peeters W, van den Brande R, Polinder S, Brazinova A, Steyerberg EW, Lingsma HF, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157(10):1683–1696. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2512-7.
    1. Roozenbeek B, Maas AIR, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(4):231–236. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.22.
    1. Fletcher AE, Khalid S, Mallonee S. The epidemiology of severe traumatic brain injury among persons 65 years of age and older in Oklahoma, 1992–2003. Brain Inj. 2007;21(7):691–699. doi: 10.1080/02699050701426873.
    1. Steudel WI, Cortbus F, Schwerdtfeger K. Epidemiology and prevention of fatal head injuries in Germany--trends and the impact of the reunification. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(3):231–242. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0441-y.
    1. Depreitere B, Meyfroidt G, Roosen G, Ceuppens J, Grandas FG. Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: a significant phenomenon. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:289–294. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_56.
    1. Bouras T, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Andrianakis I, Pitaridis M, Sakas DE. Head injury mortality in a geriatric population: differentiating an “edge” age group with better potential for benefit than older poor-prognosis patients. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(8):1355–1361. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.370.
    1. Susman M, SM DR, Sullivan T, Risucci D, Nealon P, Cuff S, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: increased mortality and worse functional outcome at discharge despite lower injury severity. J Trauma. 2002;53(2):219–223. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00004.
    1. Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma. 1993;34(2):216–222. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00006.
    1. Stocchetti N, Furlan A, Volta F. Hypoxemia and arterial hypotension at the accident scene in head injury. J Trauma. 1996;40(5):764–767. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199605000-00014.
    1. Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD, Choi SC, Young HF, Eisenberg HM, et al. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. Spec Suppl. 1991;75(1s):S59–S66.
    1. Denninghoff KR, Nuño T, Pauls Q, Yeatts SD, Silbergleit R, Palesch YY, et al. Prehospital intubation is associated with favorable outcomes and lower mortality in ProTECT III. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2017;21(5):539–544. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1315201.
    1. Bossers SM, Schwarte LA, Loer SA, Twisk JWR, Boer C, Schober P. Experience in prehospital endotracheal intubation significantly influences mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141034.
    1. Karamanos E, Talving P, Skiada D, Osby M, Inaba K, Lam L, et al. Is prehospital endotracheal intubation associated with improved outcomes in isolated severe head injury? A matched cohort analysis. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):32–36. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008947.
    1. Bernard SA, Nguyen V, Cameron P, Masci K, Fitzgerald M, Cooper DJ, et al. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):959–965. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc15f.
    1. Harmsen AMK, Giannakopoulos GF, Moerbeek PR, Jansma EP, Bonjer HJ, Bloemers FW. The influence of prehospital time on trauma patients outcome: a systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(4):602–609. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.008.
    1. Badjatia N, Carney N, Crocco TJ, Fallat ME, Hennes HMA, Jagoda AS, et al. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury 2nd edition. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S1–52. doi: 10.1080/10903120701732052.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever