Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: an observational, double-blinded study
David Couret, Delphine Boumaza, Coline Grisotto, Thibaut Triglia, Lionel Pellegrini, Philippe Ocquidant, Nicolas J Bruder, Lionel J Velly, David Couret, Delphine Boumaza, Coline Grisotto, Thibaut Triglia, Lionel Pellegrini, Philippe Ocquidant, Nicolas J Bruder, Lionel J Velly
Abstract
Background: In critical care units, pupil examination is an important clinical parameter for patient monitoring. Current practice is to use a penlight to observe the pupillary light reflex. The result seems to be a subjective measurement, with low precision and reproducibility. Several quantitative pupillometer devices are now available, although their use is primarily restricted to the research setting. To assess whether adoption of these technologies would benefit the clinic, we compared automated quantitative pupillometry with the standard clinical pupillary examination currently used for brain-injured patients.
Methods: In order to determine inter-observer agreement of the device, we performed repetitive measurements in 200 healthy volunteers ranging in age from 21 to 58 years, providing a total of 400 paired (alternative right eye, left eye) measurements under a wide variety of ambient light condition with NeuroLight Algiscan pupillometer. During another period, we conducted a prospective, observational, double-blinded study in two neurocritical care units. Patients admitted to these units after an acute brain injury were included. Initially, nursing staff measured pupil size, anisocoria and pupillary light reflex. A blinded physician subsequently performed measurement using an automated pupillometer.
Results: In 200 healthy volunteers, intra-class correlation coefficient for maximum resting pupil size was 0.95 (IC: 0.93-0.97) and for minimum pupil size after light stimulation 0.87 (0.83-0.89). We found only 3-pupil asymmetry (≥ 1 mm) in these volunteers (1.5% of the population) with a clear pupil asymmetry during clinical inspection. The mean pupil light reactivity was 40 ± 7%. In 59 patients, 406 pupillary measurements were prospectively performed. Concordance between measurements for pupil size collected using the pupillometer, versus subjective assessment, was poor (Spearmen's rho = 0.75, IC: 0.70-0.79; P < 0.001). Nursing staff failed to diagnose half of the cases (15/30) of anisocoria detected using the pupillometer device. A global rate of discordance of 18% (72/406) was found between the two techniques when assessing the pupillary light reflex. For measurements with small pupils (diameters <2 mm) the error rate was 39% (24/61).
Conclusion: Standard practice in pupillary monitoring yields inaccurate data. Automated quantitative pupillometry is a more reliable method with which to collect pupillary measurements at the bedside.
Keywords: Anisocoria; Neurocritical Care; Neurological examination; Pupillary light reflex; Pupillary reactivity; Pupillary size; Pupillometer.
Figures
References
- Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, Maas AI, Marion DW, Servadei F, Teasdale GM. Part 2: early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:557-627.
- Chesnut RM, Gautille T, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LE. The localizing value of asymmetry in pupillary size in severe head injury: relation to lesion type and location. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:840–846. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199405000-00008.
- Choi SC, Narayan RK, Anderson RL, Ward JD. Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1988;69(3):381–385. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.3.0381.
- Marmarou A, Lu J, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognositc value of the Glsasgow Coma Scale and pupill reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment; an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:270–280. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0029.
- Morris GF, Juul N, Marshall SB, Benedict B, Marshall LF. Neurological deterioration as a potential alternative endpoint in human clinical trials of experimental pharmacological agents for treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries. Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(6):1369–1372.
- Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry: a review. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1242–1253. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000314.
- Marshall LF, Barba D, Toole BM, Bowers SA. The oval pupil: clinical significance and relationship to intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1983;58(4):566–568. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.4.0566.
- Du R, Meeker M, Bacchetti P, Larson MD, Holland MC, Manley GT. Evaluation of the portable infrared pupillometer. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):198–203. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000163425.79170.CB.
- Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P, Privitera CM, Larson MD, Holland MC, et al. Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. J Neurosci Nurs. 2005;37(1):34–40. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200502000-00006.
- Manley GT, Larson MD. Infrared pupillometry during uncal herniation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002;14(3):223–228. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200207000-00009.
- Murray RB, Loughnane MH. Infrared video pupillometry: a method used to measure the pupillary effects of drugs in small laboratory animals in real time. J Neurosci Methods. 1981;3:365–375. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(81)90024-8.
- Boev AN, Fountas KN, Karampelas I, Boev C, Machinis TG, Feltes C, et al. Quantitative pupillometry: normative data in healthy pediatric volunteers. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(6 Suppl):496–500.
- Subbaram MV, Bullimore MA. Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accomodative response. Ophtalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(4):312–318. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00037.x.
- Taylor WR, Chen JW, Meltzer H, Gennarelli TA, Kelbch C, Knowlton S, et al. Quantitative pupillometry, a new technology: normative data and preliminary observations in patients with acute head injury. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(1):205–213. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0205.
- Litvan I, Saposnik G, Maurino J, Gonzalez L, Saizar R, Sica RE, et al. Pupillary diameter assessment: need for a graded scale. Neurology. 2000;54(2):530–531. doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.2.530.
- Yan S, Tu Z, Lu W, Zhang Q, He J, Li Z, et al. Clinical utility of an automated pupillometer for assessing and monitoring recipients of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009;15(12):1718–1727. doi: 10.1002/lt.21924.
- Larson MD, Muhiudeen I. Pupillometric analysis of the “absent light reflex”. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(4):369–372. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540280051018.
- Ritter AM, Muizelaar JP, Barnes T, Choi S, Fatouros P, Ward J, et al. Brain stem blood flow, pupillary response, and outcome in patients with severe head injuries. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(5):941–948. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199905000-00005.
- Larson MD, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Dechert M, Bjorksten AR, Tayefeh F. Alfentanil blocks reflex pupillary dilation in response to noxious stimulation but does not diminish the light reflex. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:849–855. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199710000-00019.
- Rollins MD, Feiner JR, Lee JM, Shah S, Larson M. Pupillary effects of high-dose opioid quantified with infrared pupillometry. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:1037–1044. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000384.
- Usui S, Stark L. Sensory and motor mechanisms interact to control amplitude of pupil noise. Vision Res. 1978;18(4):505–507. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90065-2.
- Payen JF, Bosson JL, Chanques G, Mantz J, Labarere J. Pain assessment is associated with decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a post hoc analysis of the DOLOREA study. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(6):1308–1316. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c0d4f0.
- Li D, Puntillo K, Miaskowski C. A review of objective pain measures for use with critical care adult patients unable to self-report. J Pain. 2008;9(1):2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.08.009.
- Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Machinis TG, Boev AN, Robinson JS, Troup EC. Clinical implications of quantitative infrared pupillometry in neurosurgical patients. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5(1):55–60. doi: 10.1385/NCC:5:1:55.
- Suys T, Bouzat P, Marques-Vidal P, Sala N, Payen JF, Rossetti AO, et al. Automated quantitative pupillometry for the prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(2):300–308. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9981-z.
- Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S, Bullock RM. Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: the introduction of the Neurological Pupil index. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:82. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.82248.
- Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957–2963. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035.
Source: PubMed