Acute mental stress and surgical performance

P D Grantcharov, T Boillat, S Elkabany, K Wac, H Rivas, P D Grantcharov, T Boillat, S Elkabany, K Wac, H Rivas

Abstract

Background: Stress has been shown to impact adversely on multiple facets critical to optimal performance. Advancements in wearable technology can reduce barriers to observing stress during surgery. This study aimed to investigate the association between acute intraoperative mental stress and technical surgical performance.

Methods: Continuous electrocardiogram data for a single attending surgeon were captured during surgical procedures to obtain heart rate variability (HRV) measures that were used as a proxy for acute mental stress. Two different measures were used: root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and standard deviation of RR intervals (SDNN). Technical surgical performance was assessed on the Operating Room Black Box® platform using the Generic Error Rating Tool (GERT). Both HRV recording and procedure video recording were time-stamped. Surgical procedures were fragmented to non-overlapping intervals of 1, 2 and 5 min, and subjected to data analysis. An event was defined as any deviation that caused injury to the patient or posed a risk of harm.

Results: Rates of events were significantly higher (47-66 per cent higher) in the higher stress quantiles than in the lower stress quantiles for all measured interval lengths using both proxy measures for acute mental stress. The strongest association was observed using 1-min intervals with RMSSD as the HRV measure (P < 0·001).

Conclusion: There is an association between measures of acute mental stress and worse technical surgical performance. Further study will help delineate the interdependence of these variables and identify triggers for increased stress levels to improve surgical safety.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical event rates during different stress levels: a 1‐min interval, b 2‐min interval, c 5‐min interval. SDNN, standard deviation of RR intervals; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences in RR intervals

References

    1. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 2000; 320: 745–749.
    1. Hammermeister J, Burton D. Stress, appraisal, and coping revisited: examining the antecedents of competitive state anxiety with endurance athletes. Sport Psychol 2001; 15: 66–90.
    1. Campbell DA Jr, Sonnad SS, Eckhauser FE, Campbell KK, Greenfield LJ. Burnout among American surgeons. Surgery 2001; 130: 696–705.
    1. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993; 65: 248–260.
    1. LeBlanc VR. The effects of acute stress on performance: implications for health professions education. Acad Med 2009; 84(Suppl): S25–S33.
    1. FeldmanHall O, Raio CM, Kubota JT, Seiler MG, Phelps EA. The effects of social context and acute stress on decision making under uncertainty. Psychol Sci 2015; 26: 1918–1926.
    1. Wemm SE, Wulfert E. Effects of acute stress on decision making. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2017; 42: 1–12.
    1. Cano‐López I, Cano‐López B, Hidalgo V, González‐Bono E. Effects of acute stress on decision making under ambiguous and risky conditions in healthy young men. Span J Psychol 2016; 19: E59.
    1. Morgado P, Sousa N, Cerqueira JJ. The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. J Neurosci Res 2015; 93: 839–847.
    1. Keinan G, Friedland N, Ben‐Porath Y. Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under physical threat. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1987; 64: 219–228.
    1. Cumming SR, Harris LM. The impact of anxiety on the accuracy of diagnostic decision‐making. Stress Health 2001; 17: 281–286.
    1. Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J et al The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 5–10.
    1. Ellis APJ. System breakdown: the role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Acad Manage J 2006; 49: 576–589.
    1. Driskell JE, Salas E, Johnston J. Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective? Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 1999; 3: 291–302.
    1. Böhm B, Rötting N, Schwenk W, Grebe S, Mansmann U. A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgical team during laparoscopic and conventional sigmoid resection. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 305–310.
    1. Demirtas Y, Tulmac M, Yavuzer R, Yalcin R, Ayhan S, Latifoglu O et al Plastic surgeon's life: marvelous for mind, exhausting for body. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 923–931.
    1. Arora S, Tierney T, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M et al The imperial stress assessment tool (ISAT): a feasible, reliable and valid approach to measuring stress in the operating room. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1756–1763.
    1. Yamamoto A, Hara T, Kikuchi K, Hara T, Fujiwara T. Intraoperative stress experienced by surgeons and assistants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30: 27–30.
    1. Kuhn EW, Choi YH, Schönherr M, Liakopoulos OJ, Rahmanian PB, Choi CY et al Intraoperative stress in cardiac surgery: attendings versus residents. J Surg Res 2013; 182: e43–e49.
    1. Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT. Monitor height affects surgeons' stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 111: 498–501.
    1. Rieger A, Stoll R, Kreuzfeld S, Behrens K, Weippert M. Heart rate and heart rate variability as indirect markers of surgeons' intraoperative stress. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014; 87: 165–174.
    1. Jones KI, Amawi F, Bhalla A, Peacock O, Williams JP, Lund JN. Assessing surgeon stress when operating using heart rate variability and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory: will surgery be the death of us? Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 335–341.
    1. Song MH, Tokuda Y, Nakayama T, Sato M, Hattori K. Intraoperative heart rate variability of a cardiac surgeon himself in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 8: 639–641.
    1. Prichard RS, O'Neill CJ, Oucharek JJ, Holmes CY, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. A prospective study of heart rate variability in endocrine surgery: surgical training increases consultant's mental strain. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 453–458.
    1. Sadiq SA, Arif A, Usmani HA. The stress of cataract surgery. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 4: 301.
    1. Mongin C, Dufour F, Lattanzio F, Champault G. [Evaluation of stress in surgical trainees: prospective study of heart rate during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. J Chir (Paris) 2008; 145: 138–142.
    1. Wetzel CM, Black SA, Hanna GB, Athanasiou T, Kneebone RL, Nestel D et al The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 171–176.
    1. Hassan I, Weyers P, Maschuw K, Dick B, Gerdes B, Rothmund M et al Negative stress‐coping strategies among novices in surgery correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1554–1559.
    1. Wetzel CM, George A, Hanna GB, Athanasiou T, Black SA, Kneebone RL et al Stress management training for surgeons – a randomized, controlled, intervention study. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 488–494.
    1. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bann S, Darzi A. The effect of stress‐inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1481–1484.
    1. Schuetz M, Gockel I, Beardi J, Hakman P, Dunschede F, Moenk S et al Three different types of surgeon‐specific stress reactions identified by laparoscopic simulation in a virtual scenario. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1263–1267.
    1. Baker BG, Bhalla A, Doleman B, Yarnold E, Simons S, Lund JN et al Simulation fails to replicate stress in trainees performing a technical procedure in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2017; 39: 53–57.
    1. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C et al Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 273–278.
    1. Datta V, Bann S, Mandalia M, Darzi A. The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills assessment. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 372–378.
    1. Bootsma M, Swenne CA, Van Bolhuis HH, Chang PC, Cats VM, Bruschke AV. Heart rate and heart rate variability as indexes of sympathovagal balance. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: H1565–H1571.
    1. Pagani M, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, Crivellaro W, Cerutti S, Malliani A. Spectral analysis of R‐R and arterial pressure variabilities to assess sympatho‐vagal interaction during mental stress in humans. J Hypertens Suppl 1989; 7: S14–S15.
    1. Hitchen M, Brodie DA, Harness JB. Cardiac responses to demanding mental load. Ergonomics 1980; 23: 379–385.
    1. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R. The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 2010; 147: 318–330.e6.
    1. Villar R, Beltrame T, Hughson RL. Validation of the Hexoskin wearable vest during lying, sitting, standing, and walking activities. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015; 40: 1019–1024.
    1. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology . Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043–1065.
    1. Bonrath EM, Zevin B, Dedy NJ, Grantcharov TP. Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1080–1088.
    1. Massin MM, Derkenne B, von Bernuth G. Correlations between indices of heart rate variability in healthy children and children with congenital heart disease. Cardiology 1999; 91: 109–113.
    1. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability two weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 891–898.
    1. Cipryan L. Within‐session stability of short‐term heart rate variability measurement. J Hum Kinet 2016; 50: 85–92.
    1. World Health Organization . World Alliance for Patient Safety: WHO Draft Guidelines for Adverse Event Reporting and Learning Systems: From Information to Action; 2005. [accessed 21 January 2018].
    1. Munoz ML, van Roon A, Riese H, Thio C, Oostenbroek E, Westrik I et al Validity of (ultra‐)short recordings for heart rate variability measurements. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0138921.
    1. Anton NE, Howley LD, Pimentel M, Davis CK, Brown C, Stefanidis D. Effectiveness of a mental skills curriculum to reduce novices' stress. J Surg Res 2016; 206: 199–205.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever