A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of Endostar in patients with metastatic melanoma

Chuanliang Cui, Lili Mao, Zhihong Chi, Lu Si, Xinan Sheng, Yan Kong, Siming Li, Bin Lian, Kangsheng Gu, Min Tao, Xin Song, Tongyu Lin, Xiubao Ren, Shukui Qin, Jun Guo, Chuanliang Cui, Lili Mao, Zhihong Chi, Lu Si, Xinan Sheng, Yan Kong, Siming Li, Bin Lian, Kangsheng Gu, Min Tao, Xin Song, Tongyu Lin, Xiubao Ren, Shukui Qin, Jun Guo

Abstract

Endostatin is a potent endogenous angiogenic inhibitor with implicated antitumor activity. However, efficacy of recombinant human endostatin (rhES) in clinical trials is controversial, and application of rhES in treatment of metastatic melanoma awaits further investigations. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a soluble and stable rhES (Endostar) plus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanomas that contains no mutations in c-kit and BRAF genes. A total of 110 patients received placebo plus dacarbazine (250 mg/m², n = 54) or Endostar (7.5 mg/m²) plus dacarbazine (250 mg/m², n = 56). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Median PFS in the Endostar plus dacarbazine arm was 4.5 months versus 1.5 months in the placebo plus dacarbazine arm (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.578; P = 0.013). There were statistically significant improvements in OS (median, 12.0 months versus 8.0 months; HR, 0.522; P = 0.005) in favor of the Endostar plus dacarbazine arm. The regimen was generally well tolerated and had a manageable toxicity profile. Our trial suggests that Endostar plus dacarbazine is well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma harboring no genetic mutations popular for targeted therapy and yields a significant improvement in PFS and OS.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier estimated survival for all patients by treatment groups. (a) progression-free survival and (b) overall survival for all patients. CI, confidence interval; D, dacarbazine; E, Endostar; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; P, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier estimated survival for patients with poor prognosis by treatment groups. (a) progression-free survival and (b) overall survival for patients with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. CI, confidence interval; D, dacarbazine; E, Endostar; HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; P, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival by subgroups for all randomly assigned patients. (a) Progression-free survival (PFS); (b) overall survival (OS). CI, confidence interval; CSD, melanomas on skin with chronic sun-induced damage; NCSD, melanomas on skin without chronic sun-induced damage; ULN, upper limit of the normal range; UP, melanoma of unknown primary.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever