Managerial thinking in neonatal care: a qualitative study of place of care decision-making for preterm babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation in England

Caroline Cupit, Alexis Paton, Elaine Boyle, Thillagavathie Pillay, Natalie Armstrong, OPTI-PREM Study Team, Victor L Banda, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Kelvin Dawson, Elizabeth S Draper, Abdul Qader T Ismail, Bradley Manktelow, Neena Modi, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang, Caroline Cupit, Alexis Paton, Elaine Boyle, Thillagavathie Pillay, Natalie Armstrong, OPTI-PREM Study Team, Victor L Banda, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Kelvin Dawson, Elizabeth S Draper, Abdul Qader T Ismail, Bradley Manktelow, Neena Modi, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang

Abstract

Objectives: Preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation in England are usually born and cared for in either a neonatal intensive care unit or a local neonatal unit-with such units forming part of Operational Delivery Networks. As part of a national project seeking to optimise service delivery for this group of babies (OPTI-PREM), we undertook qualitative research to better understand how decisions about place of birth and care are made and operationalised.

Design: Qualitative analysis of ethnographic observation data in neonatal units and semi-structured interviews with neonatal staff.

Setting: Six neonatal units across two neonatal networks in England. Two were neonatal intensive care units and four were local neonatal units.

Participants: Clinical staff (n=15) working in neonatal units, and people present in neonatal units during periods of observation.

Results: In the context of real-world neonatal practice, with multiple (and rapidly-evolving) uncertainties relating to mothers, babies and unit/network capacity, 'best place of care' protocols were only one element of much more complex decision-making processes. Staff often made judgements from a less-than-ideal starting point, and were forced to respond to evolving clinical and organisational factors. In particular, we report that managerial considerations relating to demand and capacity organised decision-making; demand and capacity management was time-consuming and generated various pressures on families, and tensions between staff.

Conclusions: Researchers and policymakers should take account of the organisational context within which place of care decisions are made. The dominance of demand and capacity management considerations is likely to limit the impact of other improvement interventions, such as initiatives to integrate families into the neonatal care provision. Demand and capacity management is an important element of neonatal care that may be overlooked, but significantly organises how care is delivered.

Keywords: fetal medicine; health services administration & management; neonatal intensive & critical care; neonatology; qualitative research; social medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Watson SI, Arulampalam W, Petrou S, et al. . The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004856. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004856
    1. Helenius K, Longford N, Lehtonen L, et al. . Association of early postnatal transfer and birth outside a tertiary hospital with mortality and severe brain injury in extremely preterm infants: observational cohort study with propensity score matching. BMJ 2019;367:l5678. 10.1136/bmj.l5678
    1. Boyle EM, Johnson S, Manktelow B, et al. . Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F479–85. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307347
    1. Pillay T, Modi N, Rivero-Arias O, et al. . Optimising neonatal service provision for preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England (OPTI-PREM), using national data, qualitative research and economic analysis: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029421. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029421
    1. NHS England . Implementing the recommendations of the neonatal critical care transformation review, 2019. Available: [Accessed 28 Oct 2021].
    1. Sommer CM, Cook CM. Disrupted bonds - parental perceptions of regionalised transfer of very preterm infants: a small-scale study. Contemp Nurse 2015;50:256–66. 10.1080/10376178.2015.1114421
    1. Ballantyne M, Orava T, Bernardo S, et al. . Parents' early healthcare transition experiences with preterm and acutely ill infants: a scoping review. Child Care Health Dev 2017;43:783–96. 10.1111/cch.12458
    1. Aagaard H, Hall EOC, Ludvigsen MS, et al. . Parents' experiences of neonatal transfer. A meta-study of qualitative research 2000-2017. Nurs Inq 2018;25:e12231. 10.1111/nin.12231
    1. Ringham CL, MacKinnon K. Mothering work and perinatal transfer: an institutional ethnographic investigation. Can J Nurs Res 2021;53:27–38. 10.1177/0844562119884388
    1. British Association of Perinatal Medicine . Optimal arrangements for neonatal intensive care units in the UK including guidance on their medical staffing a framework for practice. London, 2021. Available: [Accessed 25 Oct 2021].
    1. Fenton AC, Leslie A, Skeoch CH. Optimising neonatal transfer. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F215–9. 10.1136/adc.2002.019711
    1. Gill AB, Bottomley L, Chatfield S, et al. . Perinatal transport: problems in neonatal intensive care capacity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F220–3. 10.1136/adc.2003.028159
    1. Fowlie PW, Booth P, Skeoch CH. Moving the preterm infant. BMJ 2004;329:904–6. 10.1136/bmj.329.7471.904
    1. Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Nagarajan S, et al. . Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study. BMJ 2012;344:e2105. 10.1136/bmj.e2105
    1. Savage J. Ethnography and health care. BMJ 2000;321:1400–2. 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400
    1. Dixon-Woods M. What can ethnography do for quality and safety in health care? Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:326–7. 10.1136/qhc.12.5.326
    1. Leslie M, Paradis E, Gropper MA, et al. . Applying ethnography to the study of context in healthcare quality and safety. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:99–105. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002335
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of Grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
    1. Smith DE. The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987.
    1. Campbell M, Gregor FM. Mapping social relations: a primer in doing institutional ethnography. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002.
    1. Smith DE. Institutional ethnography as practice. Washington DC: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
    1. Rankin J. Conducting analysis in institutional ethnography: guidance and cautions. Int J Qual Methods 2017;16:1609406917734472.
    1. Sinding C, Hudak P, Wiernikowski J, et al. . "I like to be an informed person but…" negotiating responsibility for treatment decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1094–101. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.005
    1. Campbell ML, Rankin JM. Nurses and electronic health records in a Canadian Hospital: examining the social organisation and programmed use of digitised nursing knowledge. Sociol Health Illn 2017;39:365–79. 10.1111/1467-9566.12489
    1. Reid L, Kydd A, Slade B. An inquiry into what organised difficult advance care planning conversations in a Scottish residential care home using institutional ethnography. J Res Nurs 2018;23:220–36. 10.1177/1744987118756477
    1. Cupit C, Rankin J, Armstrong N, et al. . Overruling uncertainty about preventative medications: the social organisation of healthcare professionals' knowledge and practices. Sociol Health Illn 2020;42 Suppl 1:114–29. 10.1111/1467-9566.12998
    1. Bliss . What we do, 2020. Available: [Accessed 16 Mar 2020].
    1. British Association for Perinatal Medicine . Optimal arrangements for neonatal intensive care units in the UK. British association for perinatal medicine, 2014. Available: [Accessed 25 Nov 2019].
    1. British Association of Perinatal Medicine . Neonatal service quality indicators: standards relating to structures and processes. British association of perinatal medicine, 2017. Available: [Accessed 25 Nov 2019].
    1. Edwards K, Impey L. Extreme preterm birth in the right place: a quality improvement project. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2020;105:445–8. 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317741
    1. BAPM . Categories of care, 2011. Available:
    1. NHS England . National programmes of care and clinical reference groups: neonatal critical care service specification, 2016. Available: [Accessed 4 Feb 2020].
    1. NHS England . Implementing the recommendations of the neonatal critical care transformation review, 2016. Available: [Accessed 4 Feb 2020].
    1. Brødsgaard A, Pedersen JT, Larsen P, et al. . Parents' and nurses' experiences of partnership in neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative review and meta-synthesis. J Clin Nurs 2019;28:3117–39. 10.1111/jocn.14920
    1. Ringham C, Rankin J, Marcellus L. The social organization of neonatal nurses' feeding work. Neonatal Netw 2020;39:283–92. 10.1891/0730-0832.39.5.283
    1. Griffith AI, Smith DE, eds. Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-line Work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014.
    1. Timmermans S, Epstein S. A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol 2010;36:69–89. 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever