Abstinence Reinforcement Therapy (ART) for rural veterans: Methodology for an mHealth smoking cessation intervention
Sarah M Wilson, Lauren P Hair, Jeffrey S Hertzberg, Angela C Kirby, Maren K Olsen, Jennifer H Lindquist, Matthew L Maciejewski, Jean C Beckham, Patrick S Calhoun, Sarah M Wilson, Lauren P Hair, Jeffrey S Hertzberg, Angela C Kirby, Maren K Olsen, Jennifer H Lindquist, Matthew L Maciejewski, Jean C Beckham, Patrick S Calhoun
Abstract
Introduction: Smoking is the most preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in U.S. veterans. Rural veterans in particular have elevated risk for smoking and smoking-related illness. However, these veterans underutilize smoking cessation treatment, which suggests that interventions for rural veterans should optimize efficacy and reach.
Objective: The primary goal of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention that combines evidenced based treatment for smoking cessation with smart-phone based, portable contingency management on smoking rates compared to a contact control intervention in a randomized controlled trial among rural Veteran smokers. Specifically, Veterans will be randomized to receive Abstinence Reinforcement Therapy (ART) which combines evidenced based cognitive-behavioral telephone counseling (TC), a tele-medicine clinic for access to nicotine replacement (NRT), and mobile contingency management (mCM) or a control condition (i.e., TC and NRT alone) that will provide controls for therapist, medication, time and attention effects.
Methods: Smokers were identified using VHA electronic medical records and recruited proactively via telephone. Participants (N=310) are randomized to either ART or a best practice control consisting of telephone counseling and telemedicine. Participating patients will be surveyed at 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-randomization. The primary outcome measure is self-reported and biochemically validated prolonged abstinence at 6-month follow-up.
Discussion: This trial is designed to test the relative effectiveness of ART compared to a telehealth-only comparison group. Dissemination of this mHealth intervention for veterans in a variety of settings would be warranted if ART improves smoking outcomes for rural veterans and is cost-effective.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Financial incentives; Mobile health=mHealth; Smoking cessation; Telehealth; eHealth.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Source: PubMed