Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance

Chee Hae Kim, Seokhun Yang, Jinlong Zhang, Joo Myung Lee, Masahiro Hoshino, Tadashi Murai, Doyeon Hwang, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Jianan Wang, Shao-Liang Chen, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Bon-Kwon Koo, Chee Hae Kim, Seokhun Yang, Jinlong Zhang, Joo Myung Lee, Masahiro Hoshino, Tadashi Murai, Doyeon Hwang, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Jianan Wang, Shao-Liang Chen, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Bon-Kwon Koo

Abstract

Background: The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood.

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological significance.

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of a pooled population of multicenter, international prospective cohorts. Patients (166 women and 489 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) within 90 days before invasive FFR measurements were included. The minimal lumen area, percent of plaque burden, whole vessel plaque volume by composition, high-risk plaque characteristics, and LV mass were analyzed from CCTA images.

Results: Among 1,188 vessels analyzed, the FFR value was higher in women than that in men (0.85 ± 0.13 vs 0.82 ± 0.14; P = 0.001) despite a similar percentage of diameter stenosis between the sexes (45.9% ± 18.9% vs 46.1% ± 17.7%; P = 0.920). The composition of fibrofatty plaque + necrotic core (13.1% ± 16.9% vs 21.2% ± 19.9%; P < 0.001) and frequencies of low attenuation plaque (12.7% vs 24.5%; P < 0.001) and positive remodeling (33.8% vs 45.5%; P = 0.001) were lower in women than in men. Vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than that in men (all P < 0.001); however, no sex difference was observed in any of these parameters after adjustment for LV mass (all P > 0.10). Sex was not an independent predictor of the FFR value after adjustment for stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and LV mass.

Conclusions: Higher FFR values for the same stenosis severity in women can be explained by fewer high-risk plaque characteristics and smaller myocardial mass in women than that in men. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163).

Keywords: CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; FFNC, fibrofatty + necrotic core; FFR, fractional flow reserve; LV, left ventricle; MLA, minimal lumen area; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; myocardial mass; plaque; sex.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was supported in part by an unrestricted research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular). The company had no role in study design, conduct, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. Dr Lee gas received a research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. Dr Doh has received a research grant from Philips Volcano. Dr Chen has been a consultant for Microport and Boston Scientific International; and has received a grant from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China. Dr Koo has received an institutional research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

© 2022 The Authors.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Distributions of CCTA Parameters (A) Distributions of minimal lumen area (MLA), (B) percentage of plaque burden at the MLA site, (C) whole vessel plaque volume, and (D) fractional flow reserve (FFR). Bars indicate the frequencies among vessels. CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vessel, Plaque, and Lumen Volume After Adjustment for LV Mass In whole vessel analysis, (A, C, E) vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than those in men. However, after adjustment for left ventricular (LV) mass, there were no differences in any of (B, D, F) vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes between women and men. Box-and-whisker plots indicate the median (center line of the box), 25% and 75% ranges (box edges), and 10% and 90% ranges (whiskers).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of Plaque Composition According to Sex The (A) absolute volume and (B) percentage of each plaque composition are plotted according to sex.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Sex Differences in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Parameters and Fractional Flow Reserve Despite similar luminal narrowing and plaque burden between women and men, the composition of lipid-rich plaque and frequencies of qualitative high-risk plaque characteristics were lower in women, indicating more favorable plaque characteristics in women. The fractional flow reserve (FFR) value was higher in women than in men despite similar stenosis severity; however, sex was not an independent factor that affected the FFR value after adjusting for plaque characteristics and the left ventricular (LV) mass. CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography; LAP = low attenuation plaque; PR = positive remodeling.

References

    1. Merz A.A., Cheng S. Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing. Heart. 2016;102:825–831.
    1. Yahagi K., Davis H.R., Arbustini E., Virmani R. Sex differences in coronary artery disease: pathological observations. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239:260–267.
    1. Farb A., Burke A.P., Tang A.L., et al. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core: a frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary death. Circulation. 1996;93:1354–1363.
    1. Kim C.H., Koo B.K., Lee J.M., et al. Influence of sex on relationship between total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens and their prognostic implications in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8
    1. Kim H.-S., Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., et al. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:1037–1042.
    1. Gaur S., Øvrehus K.A., Dey D., et al. Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1220–1227.
    1. Driessen R.S., Stuijfzand W.J., Raijmakers P.G., et al. Effect of plaque burden and morphology on myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:499–509.
    1. Park H.-B., Heo R., ó Hartaigh B., et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:1–10.
    1. Kim H.Y., Lim H.-S., Doh J.-H., et al. Physiological severity of coronary artery stenosis depends on the amount of myocardial mass subtended by the coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9:1548–1560.
    1. Choy J.S., Kassab G.S. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1281–1286.
    1. Fairbairn T.A., Dobson R., Hurwitz-Koweek L., et al. Sex differences in coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from ADVANCE. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;13:2576–2587.
    1. Meijboom W.B., Meijs M.F., Schuijf J.D., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135–2144.
    1. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732.
    1. Lee J.M., Koo B.-K., Shin E.-S., et al. Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:945–951.
    1. Lee J.M., Choi K.H., Koo B.-K., et al. Prognostic implications of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2413–2424.
    1. Chang H.-J., Lin F.Y., Lee S.-E., et al. Coronary atherosclerotic precursors of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2511–2522.
    1. Park H.-B., Lee B.K., Shin S., et al. Clinical feasibility of 3D automated coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification algorithm on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3073–3083.
    1. Leipsic J., Abbara S., Achenbach S., et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–358.
    1. Maurovich-Horvat P., Ferencik M., Voros S., Merkely B., Hoffmann U. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:390–402.
    1. Lee J.M., Choi G., Koo B.-K., et al. Identification of high-risk plaques destined to cause acute coronary syndrome using coronary computed tomographic angiography and computational fluid dynamics. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;12:2288–2289.
    1. Fritz J., Edlinger M., Kelleher C., et al. Mediation analysis of the relationship between sex, cardiovascular risk factors and mortality from coronary heart disease: findings from the population-based VHM&PP cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:86–92.
    1. Lansky A.J., Ng V.G., Maehara A., et al. Gender and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis, plaque composition, and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5:S62–S72.
    1. Ten M.H., Rijndertse M., Cheng J.M., et al. Sex differences in plaque characteristics by intravascular imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:320–328.
    1. Guagliumi G., Capodanno D., Saia F., et al. Mechanisms of atherothrombosis and vascular response to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in women versus men with acute myocardial infarction: results of the OCTAVIA study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7:958–968.
    1. Lee S.-E., Sung J.M., Andreini D., et al. Sex differences in compositional plaque volume progression in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;13:2386–2396.
    1. Fujii K., Carlier S.G., Mintz G.S., et al. Intravascular ultrasound study of patterns of calcium in ruptured coronary plaques. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:352–357.
    1. Crystal G.J., Klein L.W. Fractional flow reserve: physiological basis, advantages and limitations, and potential gender differences. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11:209–219.
    1. Kobayashi Y., Fearon W.F., Honda Y., et al. Effect of sex differences on invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015;8:1433–1441.
    1. Patel M.B., Bui L.P., Kirkeeide R.L., Gould K.L. Imaging microvascular dysfunction and mechanisms for female-male differences in CAD. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2016;9:465–482.
    1. Nakazato R., Park H.-B., Gransar H., et al. Additive diagnostic value of atherosclerotic plaque characteristics to non-invasive FFR for identification of lesions causing ischaemia: results from a prospective international multicentre trial. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:473–481.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever