Prognostic Implications of Comprehensive Whole Vessel Plaque Quantification Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

Seokhun Yang, Joo Myung Lee, Masahiro Hoshino, Tadashi Murai, Ki Hong Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Kyung-Jin Kim, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Chang-Wook Nam, Jinlong Zhang, Jianan Wang, Shao-Liang Chen, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Bon-Kwon Koo, Seokhun Yang, Joo Myung Lee, Masahiro Hoshino, Tadashi Murai, Ki Hong Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Kyung-Jin Kim, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Chang-Wook Nam, Jinlong Zhang, Jianan Wang, Shao-Liang Chen, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Bon-Kwon Koo

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of whole vessel plaque quantification has not been fully understood.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of whole vessel plaque quantification on coronary computed tomography angiography.

Methods: In a total of 1,013 vessels with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement and available coronary computed tomography angiography, high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) included minimum lumen area <4 mm2, plaque burden ≥70%, low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and napkin-ring sign; and high-risk vessel characteristics (HRVC) included total plaque volume ≥306.5 mm3, fibrofatty and necrotic core volume ≥4.46 mm3, or percent total atheroma volume ≥32.2% in a target vessel, based on corresponding optimal cutoff values. Survival analysis for vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 5 years was performed using marginal Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: Whole vessel plaque quantification had incremental predictability in addition to % diameter stenosis and HRPC (P < 0.001) in predicting FFR ≤0.80. Among 517 deferred vessels based on FFR >0.80, the number of HRVC was significantly associated with the risk of VOCO (HR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.77-3.64) and enhanced the predictability for VOCO of % diameter stenosis and the number of HRPC (P < 0.001). In a landmark analysis at 2 years, the number of HRVC showed sustained prognostic implications beyond 2 years, but the number of HRPC did not.

Conclusions: Whole vessel plaque quantification can provide incremental predictability for low FFR and additive prognostic value in deferred vessels with high FFR over anatomical severity and lesion plaque characteristics. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163).

Keywords: CAD, coronary artery disease; CTA, computed tomography angiography; FFNC, fibrofatty and necrotic core; FFR, fractional flow reserve; HRPC, high-risk plaque characteristics; HRVC, high-risk vessel characteristics; MLA, minimum lumen area; VOCO, vessel-oriented composite outcome; atherosclerosis; coronary CT angiography; fractional flow reserve; plaque quantification.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was supported in part by an unrestricted research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular). The company had no role in study design, conduct, data analysis or manuscript preparation. Dr Lee has received a research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. Dr Doh has received a research grant from Philips Volcano. Dr Chen has served as a consultant for Microport and Boston Scientific International; and has received a grant from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China. Prof Koo has received an institutional research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

© 2021 The Author(s).

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
The Association of FFR ≤0.80 With Whole Vessel Plaque Quantification The proportion of the vessels with FFR ≤0.80 increased with increasing quartile of total plaque volume, FFNC component volume, and percent total atheroma volume. FFNC = fibrofatty and necrotic core; FFR = fractional flow reserve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predictive Value of Whole Vessel Plaque Quantification for FFR ≤0.80 Whole vessel plaque quantification had incremental predictability for FFR ≤0.80 over % diameter stenosis and HRPC. HRPC was defined as MLA 2, plaque burden ≥70%, low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and napkin-ring sign. Whole vessel plaque quantification included the measurement of total plaque volume, FFNC component volume, and percent total atheroma volume. FFNC = fibrofatty and necrotic core; FFR = fractional flow reserve; HRPC = high-risk plaque characteristics. MLA = minimum lumen area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative Incidence of VOCO by Each Component of HRVC Each component of HRVC discriminated 5-year VOCO in the deferred vessels with FFR >0.80. HRVC was defined as a vessel with total plaque volume ≥306.5 mm3, FFNC component volume ≥4.46 mm3, and percent total atheroma volume ≥32.2%. HRVC = high-risk vessel characteristics; VOCO = vessel-oriented composite outcome; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prognostic Implications of the Number of HRVC The risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome increased with an increment of the number of HRVC in the deferred vessels with fractional flow reserve >0.80. HRVC = high-risk vessel characteristics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Incremental Prognostic Value of the Number of HRVC for VOCO The number of HRVC showed additive discrimination ability for VOCO over % diameter stenosis and the number of HRPC in the deferred vessels with FFR >0.80. The definition of HRVC and HRPC was the same as in Figures 2 and 3. Abbreviations as in Figure 3.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Prognostic Implications of Whole Vessel Plaque Quantification Using CT Angiography Whole vessel plaque quantification included total plaque volume, FFNC component volume, and percent total atheroma volume. It had additive predictive value for FFR ≤0.80 over lesion-level stenosis severity and HRPC. The number of HRVC discriminated clinical outcomes and provided long-term prognostication in the deferred vessels with FFR >0.80. HRPC was defined as MLA 2, plaque burden ≥70%, low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and napkin-ring sign. HRVC was defined as a vessel with total plaque volume ≥306.5 mm3, percent total atheroma volume ≥32.2%, and FFNC component volume ≥4.46 mm3.

References

    1. Versteylen M.O., Kietselaer B.L., Dagnelie P.C., et al. Additive value of semiautomated quantification of coronary artery disease using cardiac computed tomographic angiography to predict future acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2296–2305.
    1. Stone G.W., Maehara A., Lansky A.J., et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–235.
    1. Cheng J.M., Garcia-Garcia H.M., de Boer S.P., et al. In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:639–647.
    1. Cho I., Al'Aref S.J., Berger A., et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography findings in asymptomatic individuals: a 6-year follow-up from the prospective multicentre international CONFIRM study. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:934–941.
    1. Newby D.E., Adamson P.D., Berry C., et al. Coronary CT angiography and 5-Year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:924–933.
    1. Maurovich-Horvat P., Ferencik M., Voros S., Merkely B., Hoffmann U. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:390–402.
    1. Motoyama S., Ito H., Sarai M., et al. Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:337–346.
    1. Williams M.C., Moss A.J., Dweck M., et al. Coronary artery plaque characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:291–301.
    1. Yang S., Koo B.K., Hoshino M., et al. CT angiographic and plaque predictors of functionally significant coronary disease and outcome using machine learning. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;14:629–641.
    1. Chang H.J., Lin F.Y., Lee S.E., et al. Coronary atherosclerotic precursors of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2511–2522.
    1. Lee J.M., Choi K.H., Koo B.K., et al. Prognostic implications of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2413–2424.
    1. Lee S.E., Park H.B., Xuan D., et al. Consistency of quantitative analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;13:48–54.
    1. Heo R., Park H.B., Lee B.K., et al. Optimal boundary detection method and window settings for coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:3190–3198.
    1. Park H.B., Lee B.K., Shin S., et al. Clinical feasibility of 3D automated coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification algorithm on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3073–3083.
    1. Nakazato R., Shalev A., Doh J.H., et al. Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:460–467.
    1. Gaur S., Ovrehus K.A., Dey D., et al. Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1220–1227.
    1. Garcia-Garcia H.M., McFadden E.P., Farb A., et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2192–2207.
    1. Thygesen K., Alpert J.S., Jaffe A.S., et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1581–1598.
    1. Hothorn T., Lausen B. On the exact distribution of maximally selected rank statistics. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2003;43:121–137.
    1. Iskander S., Iskandrian A.E. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:57–62.
    1. Hachamovitch R., Berman D.S., Kiat H., Cohen I., Friedman J.D., Shaw L.J. Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. Circulation. 2002;105:823–829.
    1. Park H.B., Heo R., B O.H., et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:1–10.
    1. Ahmadi A., Leipsic J., Ovrehus K.A., et al. Lesion-specific and vessel-related determinants of fractional flow reserve beyond coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2018;11:521–530.
    1. Kang D.Y., Ahn J.M., Kim Y.W., et al. Impact of coronary lesion geometry on fractional flow reserve: data from Interventional Cardiology Research In-Cooperation Society-Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11
    1. Driessen R.S., Stuijfzand W.J., Raijmakers P.G., et al. Effect of plaque burden and morphology on myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:499–509.
    1. Nozue T., Takamura T., Fukui K., Hibi K., Kishi S., Michishita I. Plaque volume and morphology are associated with fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019;26:697–704.
    1. Xaplanteris P., Fournier S., Pijls N.H.J., et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:250–259.
    1. Andreini D., Magnoni M., Conte E., et al. Coronary plaque features on CTA can identify patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;13:1704–1717.
    1. Budoff M.J., Young R., Burke G., et al. Ten-year association of coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2401–2408.
    1. Lee S.E., Sung J.M., Rizvi A., et al. Quantification of coronary atherosclerosis in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11
    1. Han D., Kolli K.K., Al'Aref S.J., et al. Machine learning framework to identify individuals at risk of rapid progression of coronary atherosclerosis: from the PARADIGM registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever