Safety and efficacy of supervised strength training adopted in pregnancy

Patrick J O'Connor, Melanie S Poudevigne, M Elaine Cress, Robert W Motl, James F Clapp 3rd, Patrick J O'Connor, Melanie S Poudevigne, M Elaine Cress, Robert W Motl, James F Clapp 3rd

Abstract

Objective: Describe safety and efficacy of a supervised, low-to-moderate intensity strength training program adopted during pregnancy among women at increased risk for back pain.

Methods: 32 women adopted strength training twice per week for 12 weeks. Data on musculoskeletal injuries, symptoms, blood pressure, and the absolute external load used for 5 of 6 exercises were obtained during each session. A submaximal lumbar extension endurance exercise test was performed at weeks 5, 10, and 13.

Results: The mean (± SD) exercise session attendance rate was 80.5% (± 11.3%). No musculoskeletal injuries occurred. Potentially adverse symptoms (eg, dizziness) were infrequent (2.1% of sessions). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed large increases in the external load across 12 weeks (all P values < .001) and the percentage increases in external load from weeks 1 to 12 were 36% for leg press, 39% for leg curl, 39% for lat pull down, 41% for lumbar extension and 56% for leg extension. Training was associated with a 14% increase in lumbar endurance. Blood pressure was unchanged following acute exercise sessions and after 12 weeks of exercise training.

Conclusion: The adoption of a supervised, low-to-moderate intensity strength training program during pregnancy can be safe and efficacious for pregnant women.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
— Mean (± SE) progression of absolute (kg; Top panel) and perceived (RPE; Bottom panel) training intensity for leg press across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
— Mean (± SE) progression of absolute (kg; Top Panel) and perceived (RPE; Bottom Panel) training intensity for leg curls across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 3
Figure 3
— Mean (± SE) progression of absolute (kg; Top Panel) and perceived (RPE; Bottom Panel) training intensity for leg extension across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 4
Figure 4
— Mean (± SE) progression of absolute (kg; Top Panel) and perceived (RPE; Bottom Panel) training intensity for lat pull across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 5
Figure 5
— Mean (± SE) progression of absolute (kg; Top Panel) and perceived (RPE; Bottom Panel) training intensity for lumbar extension across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 6
Figure 6
— Mean (± SE) progression of sets (Top Panel) and perceived training intensity (RPE; Bottom Panel) transverse abdominis muscle actions across 12 weeks among 32 pregnant women.
Figure 7
Figure 7
— Mean (± SE) repetitions (Top Panel) and unadjusted perceived exertion (RPE; Bottom Panel) scores associated with the 3-min lumbar extension endurance test among 16 pregnant women.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever