Use of Consumer Wearable Devices to Promote Physical Activity: A Review of Health Intervention Studies

Steven S Coughlin, Jessica Stewart, Steven S Coughlin, Jessica Stewart

Abstract

Background: Although many wearable devices for monitoring and tracking physical activity are available to consumers, relatively few research studies have been conducted to determine their efficacy in promoting health.

Methods: In this article, data on the use of consumer wearable devices in promoting healthy behaviors are summarized based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection with relevant search terms through September 2016.

Results: A total of 274 articles were identified in the bibliographic searches. By screening abstracts or full-text articles, six pre/post test trials and seven randomized controlled trials were identified. In initial trials, consumer wearable devices have been shown to increase physical activity and help users lose weight. However, the number of studies completed to date is small and limited by small sample sizes, short study durations, and uncertain generalizability of the findings.

Conclusions: Future studies should utilize randomized controlled trial research designs, larger sample sizes, and longer study periods to better establish the efficacy of wearable devices in promoting physical activity. Additional research is needed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight loss in community settings including communities affected by health disparities. Studies focusing on children and adolescents are also needed.

Keywords: Monitoring; Obesity; Physical activity; Randomized controlled trials; Smartphone applications; Weight loss.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of search and exclusion process: (physical activity and ((Fitbit) or ((Jawbone) and (tracking)) or wearable device)). (physical activity) AND (((fitbit) OR ((jawbone) and (tracking)) OR (wearable device))).

References

    1. Allied Market Research. Smartwatch market is expected to reach $32.9 billion by 2020. 2015
    1. Ashe MC, Winters M, Hoppmann CA, et al. “Not just another walking program”: Everyday Activity Supports Yu (EASY) model—a randomized pilot study for a parallel randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1:4.
    1. Allet L, Knols RH, Shirato K, et al. Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in chronic disease: a systematic review. Sensors. 2010;10(10):9026–9052.
    1. Benzo R. Activity monitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29(6):341–347.
    1. Bade B, Nietert SB. Development and Implementation of an Exercise Prescription Protocol for Lung Cancer Patients Using Internet-Connected Fitness Trackers. SCJAS 2015
    1. Cadmus-Bertram L, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, et al. Use of the Fitbit to Measure Adherence to a Physical Activity Intervention Among Overweight or Obese, Postmenopausal Women: Self-Monitoring Trajectory During 16 Weeks. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e96.
    1. Cadmus-Bertram LA, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, et al. Randomized trial of a fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. Am J Prev Med. 2015a;49(3):414–418.
    1. Chung AE, Skinner AC, Hasty SE, et al. Tweeting to health: a novel mHealth intervention using Fitbits and Twitter to Foster healthy lifestyles. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016;2016 Epub ahead of print.
    1. Choi J, Lee JH, Vittinghoff E, et al. mHealth physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study in physically inactive pregnant women. Matren Child Health J. 2016;20(5):1091–1101.
    1. Chiauzzi E, Rodarte C, DasMahapatra P. Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC Medicine. 2015;13:77.
    1. Cook DJ, Thompson JE, Prinsen SK, et al. Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(3):1057–1061.
    1. Dietz WH. The response of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the obesity epidemic. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:575–596.
    1. Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, et al. Fitbit®: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:138–140.
    1. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:159.
    1. Hartman SJ, Natarajan L, Palmer BW, et al. Impact of increasing physical activity on cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors: Rationale and study design of Memory & Motion. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:371–376.
    1. Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Cadmus-Bertram LA, et al. Technology- and phone-based weight loss intervention: Pilot RCT in Women at Elevated Breast Cancer Risk. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):714–721.
    1. Hayes LB, Van Camp CM. Increasing physical activity of children during school recess. J Applied Behav Anal. 2015;48(3):690–695.
    1. Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K. CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors—United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(Suppl 4):3–27.
    1. Jakicic JM, Davis KK, Rogers RJ, et al. Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316(11):1161–1171.
    1. Jordan C, Klepsa A. Encouraging regular physical activity for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer patients to improve mental and physical health during treatment and survivorship. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2015
    1. Kurti AN, Dallery J. Internet-based contingency management increases walking in sedentary adults. J Applied Behav Anal. 2013;46(3):568–581.
    1. Martin SS, Feldman DI, Blumenthal RS, et al. mActive: a randomized clinical trial of an automated mHealth intervention for physical activity promotion. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(11):e002239.
    1. Naslund JA, Aschbrener KA, Bartels SG. Wearable devices and smartphones for activity tracking among people with serious mental illness. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2016;10:10–17.
    1. Noah JA, Spierer DK, Gu J, et al. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J Med Eng Technol. 2013;37(7):456–462.
    1. Parks Associates. Global sales of connected digital fitness trackers will exceed 82 million in 2019. 2015
    1. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, et al. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:21.
    1. Quintiliani LM, Mann DM, Puputti M, et al. Pilot and Feasibility Test of a Mobile Health-Supported Behavioral Counseling Intervention for Weight Management Among Breast Cancer Survivors. JMIR Cancer. 2016;2(1):e4.
    1. Rabin C, Bock B. Desired features of smartphone applications' promoting physical activity. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(10):801–803.
    1. Thompson HJ, Sedlacek SM, Paul D, et al. Effect of dietary patterns differing in carbohydrate and fat content on blood lipid and glucose profiles based on weight-loss success of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(1):R1.
    1. Vansaun MN. Molecular pathways: adiponectin and leptin signaling in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):1926–1932.
    1. Wang JB, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Natarajan L, et al. Wearable sensor/device (Fitbit One) and SMS text-messaging prompts to increase physical activity in overweight and obese adults: A randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(10):782–792.
    1. Wang JB, Cataldo JK, Ayala GX, et al. Mobile and wearable device features that matter in promoting physical activity. c JMTM. 5(2):2–11.
    1. Washington WD, Banna KM, Gibson AL. Preliminary efficacy of prize-based contingency management to increase activity levels in healthy adults. J Applied Behav Anal. 2014;47(2):231–245.
    1. Yingling LR, Brooks AT, Wallen GW, et al. Community engagement to optimize the use of web-based and wearable technology in a cardiovascular health and needs assessment study: a mixed methods approach. JMIR M health Uhealth. 2016;4(2):e38.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever