Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries

F Rayan, Sachin Bhonsle, Divyang D Shukla, F Rayan, Sachin Bhonsle, Divyang D Shukla

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to compare and correlate clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and arthroscopic findings in cases of meniscal tear and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. MRI scan results and clinical diagnosis are compared against the arthroscopic confirmation of the diagnosis. One hundred and thirty-one patients had suspected traumatic meniscal or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Clinical examination had better sensitivity (0.86 vs. 0.76), specificity (0.73 vs. 0.52), predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to MRI scan in diagnosis for medial meniscal tears. These parameters showed only marginal difference in lateral meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. We conclude that carefully performed clinical examination can give equal or better diagnosis of meniscal and ACL injuries in comparison to MRI scan. MRI may be used to rule out such injuries rather than to diagnose them.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Medial meniscal tears
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lateral meniscal tears
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical vs. MRI evaluation in injuries to lateral meniscus (LM), medial meniscus (MM), and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever