Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration

Veeramachaneni Chandrasekhar, Laharika Rudrapati, Vijetha Badami, Muralidhar Tummala, Veeramachaneni Chandrasekhar, Laharika Rudrapati, Vijetha Badami, Muralidhar Tummala

Abstract

Polymerization shrinkage is one of the dental clinician's main entanglements when placing resin-based composite restorations. None of the method can assure a perfectly sealed restoration for adhesive restorative materials; clinicians must abode problems of polymerization shrinkage and its possible ill effects. The objective of this article is to review different incremental techniques that can ruin the polymerization shrinkage stress of direct composite restoration.

Keywords: Composites; incremental techniques; layering techniques; polymerization shrinkage.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Horizontal layering technique
Figure 2
Figure 2
Oblique layering technique
Figure 3
Figure 3
Vertical layering technique
Figure 4
Figure 4
Centripetal buildup technique (showing proximal composite semitransparent layer placed toward the matrix band using composite)
Figure 5
Figure 5
A schematic drawing illustrating use of intracavity extension tip
Figure 6
Figure 6
Completed restoration demonstrating various layers of centripetal buildup technique
Figure 7
Figure 7
Split incremental technique (a) the two diagonal cuts split first uncured horizontal increment of dentin shade into four triangle-shaped portions, this followed by photocuring from buccal lingual and occlusal directions (b and c) complete filling of one diagonal cut 1 with dentin shade composite and photocured, later ½ of other diagonal cut 2 filled with dentin shade composite and photocured and other ½ of cut 3 is similarly filled and cured. And the same procedure is followed for the next horizontal incremental (d) enamel shade component followed by translucent shade composite is placed and cured showing finished restoration
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Adhesive applied on prepared cavity (b) mesiolingual incremental placed (c) distolingual incremental placed (d) mesiobuccal incremental placed (e) centrobuccal incremental placed (f) distobuccal incremental placed showing completed restoration
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) Buccal dentin restored (b) lingual dentin restored (c) final enamel layer restored showing finished restoration
Figure 10
Figure 10
Separate dentin and enamel buildup using an index (a) Preoperative view of Class I Dental Caries (DC) (b) preoperative impression of occlusal surface (using silicon putty) (c) cavity preparation completed (d) incremental restoration using dentin shade up to amelodentinal junction (e) completed restoration (obtained by applying final increment of enamel shade composite and silicon index over the unset material, minimal excess removed before curing, requiring no for occlusal adjustment)
Figure 11
Figure 11
Three-site technique

References

    1. Osborne JW, Norman RD, Gale EN. A 12-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins. Quintessence Int. 1990;21:111–4.
    1. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45–64.
    1. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508.
    1. Macedo G, Raj V, Ritter AV. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18:310–1.
    1. Zachrisson BU, Mjör IA. Remodeling of teeth by grinding. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:545–53.
    1. Heymann HO. Conservative concepts for achieving anterior esthetics. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1997;25:437–43.
    1. Leonard RH, Jr, Bentley C, Eagle JC, Garland GE, Knight MC, Phillips C, et al. Nightguard vital bleaching: A long-term study on efficacy, shade retention. Side effects, and patients' perceptions. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:357–69.
    1. Ritter AV, Leonard RH, Jr, St. Georges AJ, Caplan DJ, Haywood VB. Safety and stability of nightguard vital bleaching: 9 to 12 years post-treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14:275–85.
    1. Sundfeld RH, Croll TP, Briso AL, de Alexandre RS, Sundfeld Neto D. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent. 2007;20:67–72.
    1. Donly KJ, Jensen ME. Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: An in vitro comparison of three techniques. Pediatr Dent. 1986;8:209–12.
    1. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: Current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:79–88.
    1. Spreafico RC, Gagliani M. Composite resin restorations on posterior teeth. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M, editors. Adhesion: The Silent Revolution in Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2000. pp. 253–76.
    1. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1991;7:107–13.
    1. Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:62–6.
    1. Vanini L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8:673–82.
    1. Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: Clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:88–99.
    1. Klaff D. Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:101–13.
    1. Coli P, Brännström M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in Class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:583–91.
    1. Von Beetzen M, Li J, Nicander I, Sundström F. Microhardness and porosity of class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand. Oper Dent. 1993;18:103–9.
    1. Ericson D, Dérand T. Reduction of cervical gaps in class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:33–7.
    1. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121:251–5.
    1. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26:555–62.
    1. Hassan KA, Khier SE. Split-increment technique: An alternative approach for large cervical composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:121–8.
    1. Mackenzie L, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Direct Posterior composites: A practical guide. Dent update. 2009;36:71.
    1. Javaheri DS. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13:195–200.
    1. Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwart RS, Santos JD. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. Illinois, USA: Quintessence Books; 2006. pp. 289–339.
    1. Manauat J, Salat A. An Atlas of Composite Resin Stratification. London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2013.
    1. Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of Anterior Fixed Prosthodontics. London: Quintessence Publishing; ISBN 978-0-86715-258-6.
    1. Mackenzie L, Parmar D, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Direct anterior composites: A practical guide. Dent Update. 2013;40:297.
    1. Roopa R, Anupriya B. Effect of four different placement techniques on marginal microleakage in class II restorations: An in vitro study. World J Dent. 2011;2:111–6.
    1. Khier S, Hassan K. Efficacy of composite restorative techniques in marginal sealing of extended class v cavities. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:180197.
    1. Szep S, Frank H, Kenzel B, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D. Comparative study of composite resin placement: Centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13:243–50.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever