The impact of school-based screening on service use in adolescents at risk for mental health problems and risk-behaviour

Sophia Lustig, Michael Kaess, Nina Schnyder, Chantal Michel, Romuald Brunner, Alexandra Tubiana, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Marco Sarchiapone, Christina W Hoven, Shira Barzilay, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Julio Bobes, Pilar Alejandra Saiz, Doina Cozman, Padraig Cotter, Agnes Kereszteny, Tina Podlogar, Vita Postuvan, Airi Värnik, Franz Resch, Vladimir Carli, Danuta Wasserman, Sophia Lustig, Michael Kaess, Nina Schnyder, Chantal Michel, Romuald Brunner, Alexandra Tubiana, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Marco Sarchiapone, Christina W Hoven, Shira Barzilay, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Julio Bobes, Pilar Alejandra Saiz, Doina Cozman, Padraig Cotter, Agnes Kereszteny, Tina Podlogar, Vita Postuvan, Airi Värnik, Franz Resch, Vladimir Carli, Danuta Wasserman

Abstract

Early detection and intervention can counteract mental disorders and risk behaviours among adolescents. However, help-seeking rates are low. School-based screenings are a promising tool to detect adolescents at risk for mental problems and to improve help-seeking behaviour. We assessed associations between the intervention "Screening by Professionals" (ProfScreen) and the use of mental health services and at-risk state at 12 month follow-up compared to a control group. School students (aged 15 ± 0.9 years) from 11 European countries participating in the "Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe" (SEYLE) study completed a self-report questionnaire on mental health problems and risk behaviours. ProfScreen students considered "at-risk" for mental illness or risk behaviour based on the screening were invited for a clinical interview with a mental health professional and, if necessary, referred for subsequent treatment. At follow-up, students completed another self-report, additionally reporting on service use. Of the total sample (N = 4,172), 61.9% were considered at-risk. 40.7% of the ProfScreen at-risk participants invited for the clinical interview attended the interview, and 10.1% of subsequently referred ProfScreen participants engaged in professional treatment. There were no differences between the ProfScreen and control group regarding follow-up service use and at-risk state. Attending the ProfScreen interview was positively associated with follow-up service use (OR = 1.783, 95% CI = 1.038-3.064), but had no effect on follow-up at-risk state. Service use rates of professional care as well as of the ProfScreen intervention itself were low. Future school-based interventions targeting help-seeking need to address barriers to intervention adherence.Clinical Trials Registration: The trial is registered at the US National Institute of Health (NIH) clinical trial registry (NCT00906620, registered on 21 May, 2009), and the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000214, registered on 27 October, 2009).

Keywords: Adolescents; Mental health problems; Risk behaviours; School-based screening; Service use.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Gore FM, Bloem PJN, Patton GC et al (2011) Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 377:2093–2102.
    1. Copeland WE, Wolke D, Angold A, Costello EJ (2013) Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiat 70:419–426.
    1. Hale DR, Bevilacqua L, Viner RM (2015) Adolescent health and adult education and employment: a systematic review. Pediatrics 136:128–140.
    1. Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P (2007) Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. The Lancet 369:1302–1313.
    1. Bannink R, Broeren S, Heydelberg J et al (2015) Depressive symptoms and clustering of risk behaviours among adolescents and young adults attending vocational education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 15:396.
    1. Maslowsky J, Schulenberg JE, O’Malley PM, Kloska DD (2013) Depressive symptoms, conduct problems, and risk for polysubstance use among adolescents: results from US national surveys. Ment Health Subst Use 7:157–169.
    1. Katon W, Richardson L, Russo J et al (2010) Depressive symptoms in adolescence: the association with multiple health risk behaviors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 32:233–239.
    1. Campion J, Bhui K, Bhugra D (2012) European psychiatric association (EPA) guidance on prevention of mental disorders. Eur Psychiatry 27:68–80.
    1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O et al (2005) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:593.
    1. Pine DS, Cohen E, Cohen P et al (1999) Adolescent depressive symptoms as predictors of adult depression: moodiness or mood disorder? Am J Psychiatry 1:133–135.
    1. Gould MS, Marrocco FA, Hoagwood K et al (2009) Service use by at-risk youths after school-based suicide screening. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:1193–1201.
    1. Husky MM, McGuire L, Flynn L et al (2009) Correlates of help-seeking behavior among at-risk adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 40:15–24.
    1. Merikangas KR, He JP, Brody D et al (2010) Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among US children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics 125:75–81.
    1. Olfson M, Druss BG, Marcus SC (2015) Trends in mental health aare among children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 372:2029–2038.
    1. Dowdy E, Ritchey K, Kamphaus RW (2010) School-based screening: a population-based approach to inform and monitor children’s mental health needs. School Ment Health 2:166–176.
    1. Levy SJL, Kokotailo PK (2011) Substance use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for pediatricians. Pediatrics 128:e1330–e1340.
    1. Robinson J, Cox G, Malone A et al (2013) A systematic review of school-based interventions aimed at preventing, treating, and responding to suicide- related behavior in young people. Crisis 34:164–182.
    1. Syed EU, Hussein SA, Mahmud S (2007) Screening for emotional and behavioural problems amongst 5–11-year-old school children in Karachi, Pakistan. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:421–427.
    1. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J et al (2005) Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. JAMA 294:2064–2074.
    1. Scott MA, Wilcox HC, Schonfeld IS et al (2009) School-based screening to identify at-risk students not already known to school professionals: the Columbia suicide screen. Am J Public Health 99:334–339.
    1. Mental Health Foundation (2006) Truth hurts: report of the national inquiry into self-harm among young people. Mental Health Foundation, London
    1. Robinson J, Gook S, Yuen HP et al (2010) Depression education and identification in schools: an australian-based study. School Ment Health 2:13–22.
    1. Kaess M, Brunner R, Parzer P et al (2014) Risk-behaviour screening for identifying adolescents with mental health problems in Europe. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23:611–620.
    1. Peña JB, Caine ED (2006) Screening as an approach for adolescent suicide prevention. Suicide Life Threat Behav 36:614–637.
    1. Wasserman D, Hoven CW, Wasserman C et al (2015) School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet 385:1536–1544.
    1. Aseltine RH, DeMartino R (2004) An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide. Am J Public Health 94:446–451.
    1. Hawton K, van Heeringen K (2009) Suicide. The Lancet 373:1372–1381.
    1. Wasserman D, Carli V, Wasserman C et al (2010) Saving and empowering young lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 10:192–215.
    1. Carli V, Wasserman C, Wasserman D et al (2013) The saving and empowering young lives in Europe (SEYLE) randomized controlled trial (RCT): methodological issues and participant characteristics. BMC Public Health 13:479.
    1. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D et al (1997) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980–988.
    1. Sanci L, Lewis D, Patton G (2010) Detecting emotional disorder in young people in primary care. Curr Opin Psychiatry 23:318–323.
    1. Hom MA, Stanley IH, Joiner TE (2015) Evaluating factors and interventions that influence help-seeking and mental health service utilization among suicidal individuals: a review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev 40:28–39.
    1. Kahn JP, Tubiana A, Cohen RF et al (2015) Important variables when screening for students at suicidal risk: findings from the French cohort of the SEYLE study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:12277–12290.
    1. Kaess M, Schnyder N, Michel C et al (2020) Twelve-month service use, suicidality and mental health problems of European adolescents after a school-based screening for current suicidality. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever