Head lice predictors and infestation dynamics among primary school children in Norway

Tone Birkemoe, Heidi Heggen Lindstedt, Preben Ottesen, Arnulf Soleng, Øyvind Næss, Bjørn Arne Rukke, Tone Birkemoe, Heidi Heggen Lindstedt, Preben Ottesen, Arnulf Soleng, Øyvind Næss, Bjørn Arne Rukke

Abstract

Background: Health providers need to know which measures to take and children to prioritize in order to decrease costs associated with head lice infestations.

Objective: Our aim was to determine the most important predictors for head lice and identify the major drivers of an infestation outbreak in a low-prevalence area.

Methods: The study was based on three datasets of head lice prevalence (retrospective, point prevalence and prospective approach) from primary school children (ages 6-12) at 12 schools in Oslo, Norway. The tested predictors were siblings with lice, individual and household characteristics as well as class and school affiliation. Self-reported monthly incidences (prospective approach) of head lice were used to evaluate infestation dynamics.

Results: Infested siblings strongly increased the odds of head lice infestation of school children (odds ratio 36, 26 and 7 in the three datasets) whereas having short hair halved the odds. Household characteristics were of minor importance, and class affiliation proved more important than school affiliation. Having head lice in one school term increased the odds of an infestation in the next, but this effect diminished over time. About 97% of all self-reported infestations were noted in two consecutive months or less.

Conclusions: With the exception of hair length, we have found that individual and household characteristics are of minor importance to predict head lice infestations in a low-prevalence country and that unnoticed transmissions in school classes and families are likely to be the major driver upon outbreaks.

Keywords: Multilevel analysis; pediculosis; population dynamics; prevalence; schools; socio-economic factors..

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.

References

    1. Falagas ME, Matthaiou DK, Rafailidis PI, Panos G, Pappas G. Worldwide prevalence of head lice. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: 1493–4.
    1. Burgess IF. Human lice and their management. In Baker JR, Muller R, Rollinson D. (eds). Advances in Parasitology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1995, pp. 271–341.
    1. Rukke BA, Birkemoe T, Soleng A, Lindstedt HH, Ottesen P. Head lice prevalence among households in Norway: importance of spatial variables and individual and household characteristics. Parasitology 2011; 138: 1296–304.
    1. Heukelbach J. (ed). Management and Control of Head Lice Infestations. Bremen, Germany: UNI-MED Verlag AG, 2010.
    1. Rukke BA, Birkemoe T, Soleng A, Lindstedt HH, Ottesen P. Head lice in Norwegian households: actions taken, costs and knowledge. PLoS One 2012; 7: e32686.
    1. Rukke BA, Soleng A, Lindstedt HH, Ottesen P, Birkemoe T. Socioeconomic status, family background and other key factors influence the management of head lice in Norway. Parasitol Res 2014; 113: 1847–61.
    1. Jahnke C, Bauer E, Feldmeier H. Pediculosis capita in childhood: epidemological and socio-medical results from screening of school beginners [German]. Gesundheitswesen 2008; 70: 667–3.
    1. Canyon DV, Speare R, Muller R. Spatial and kinetic factors for the transfer of head lice (Pediculus capitis) between hairs. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119: 629–31.
    1. Takano-Lee M, Edman JD, Mullens BA, Clark JM. Transmission potential of the human head louse, Pediculus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae). Int J Dermatol 2005; 44: 811–6.
    1. Willems S, Lapeere H, Haedens N, et al. The importance of socio-economic status and individual characteristics on the prevalence of head lice in schoolchildren. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15: 387–92.
    1. Mossong J, Hens N, Jit M, et al. Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e74.
    1. Speare R, Buettner PG. Head lice in pupils of a primary school in Australia and implications for control. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 285–90.
    1. Counahan M, Andrews R, Büttner P, Byrnes G, Speare R. Head lice prevalence in primary schools in Victoria, Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 2004; 40: 616–9.
    1. Burgess IF. Pediculus humanus capitis in schoolchildren. Lancet 1995; 345: 730–2.
    1. Stone P, Wilkinson-Herbots H, Isham V. A stochastic model for head lice infections. J Math Biol 2008; 56: 743–63.
    1. Ibarra J, Fry F, Clarice W, et al. Overcoming health inequalities by using the Bug Busting ‘whole-school approach’ to eradicate head lice. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 1955–65.
    1. Norwegian Pharmacy Organization. Økning i salg av lusemidler (accessed on 10 August 2015).
    1. Speare R, Buettner PG. Hard data needed on head lice transmission. Int J Dermatol 2000; 39: 877–8.
    1. Pilger D, Heukelbach J, Khakban A, et al. Household-wide ivermectin treatment for head lice in an impoverished community: randomized observer-blinded controlled trial. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 90–6.
    1. Mumcuoglu KY, Barker SC, Burgess IE, et al. International guidelines for effective control of head louse infestations. J Drugs Dermatol 2007; 6: 409–14.
    1. Ibarra J, Fry F, Wickenden C, Jenner M, Franks A. The impact of well-developed preventative strategies on the eradication of head lice. Perspect Public Health 2009; 129: 165–73.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever