An exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled, 14 day trial of the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator praliciguat in participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

John P Hanrahan, Jelena P Seferovic, James D Wakefield, Phebe J Wilson, Jennifer G Chickering, Joon Jung, Kenneth E Carlson, Daniel P Zimmer, Andrew L Frelinger 3rd, Alan D Michelson, Linda Morrow, Michael Hall, Mark G Currie, G Todd Milne, Albert T Profy, John P Hanrahan, Jelena P Seferovic, James D Wakefield, Phebe J Wilson, Jennifer G Chickering, Joon Jung, Kenneth E Carlson, Daniel P Zimmer, Andrew L Frelinger 3rd, Alan D Michelson, Linda Morrow, Michael Hall, Mark G Currie, G Todd Milne, Albert T Profy

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Praliciguat (IW-1973), a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, amplifies nitric oxide signalling. This exploratory trial investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic effects of praliciguat in individuals with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Methods: This Phase IIA, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated praliciguat in 26 participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension on stable glucose- and BP-lowering therapies. Participants were randomly allocated in a 3:5:5 ratio to three groups: placebo (n = 6), praliciguat 40 mg once daily for days 1-14 (n = 10), or praliciguat 20 mg twice daily for days 1-7 then 40 mg once daily for days 8-14 (n = 10). Assessments were made in clinic and included treatment-emergent adverse events, pharmacokinetics, metabolic variables, 24 h BP and heart rate, platelet function, reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) and plasma biomarkers. Participants, the sponsor, the investigator and clinic study staff (except designated pharmacy personnel) were blinded to group assignment.

Results: Participants treated for 14 days with praliciguat had least-square mean change-from-baseline differences vs placebo (95% CI) of -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4) mmol/l for fasting plasma glucose, -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) mmol/l for total cholesterol, -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1) mmol/l for LDL-cholesterol, -23 (-56, 9) for HOMA-IR in those not being treated with insulin, and -5 (-10, 1) mmHg and 3 (-1, 6) beats/min for average 24 h mean arterial pressure and heart rate, respectively. Apart from one serious adverse event (SAE; upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage), praliciguat was well tolerated. Praliciguat did not affect platelet function or RHI. Among exploratory biomarkers, plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine decreased in praliciguat vs placebo recipients.

Conclusions/interpretation: In participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension on standard therapies, over 14 days praliciguat was well tolerated, except for a single SAE, and showed positive trends in metabolic and BP variables. These results support further clinical investigation of praliciguat.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03091920.

Funding: This trial was funded by Cyclerion Therapeutics.

Keywords: BP; Cyclic guanosine monophosphate; Endothelial function; Hyperlipidaemia; Hypertension; Insulin resistance; Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator; Type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

LM is an employee of ProSciento, Inc., the contract research organisation that conducted the study. ALF and ADM are the principal investigators on a research grant to Boston Children’s Hospital from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. All other authors are employed by and may own stock/stock options in Cyclerion Therapeutics. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes in metabolic variables from baseline to week 2. Data are presented as LS mean change from baseline with 95% CIs. LS mean differences (95% CI) between praliciguat (n = 19) and placebo-treated (n = 6) participants were as follows: (a) plasma glucose, −0.7 (−1.8, 0.4) mmol/l; (b) total cholesterol, −0.7 (−1.1, −0.2) mmol/l; (c) LDL-cholesterol, −0.5 (−1.0, −0.1) mmol/l; and (d) triacylglycerol, −0.2 (−0.5, 0.2) mmol/l
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in haemodynamic variables from baseline to week 2 measured by 24 h ABPM. Data are presented as LS mean change from baseline with 95% CIs. LS mean differences (95% CI) between praliciguat-treated (n = 19) and placebo-treated (n = 6) participants were as follows: (a) systolic BP, −2 (−10, 5) mmHg; (b) diastolic BP, −4 (−9, 1) mmHg; (c) MAP, −5 (−10, 1) mmHg; and (d) heart rate, 3 (−1, 6) bpm

References

    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes Translation . National diabetes statistics report, 2014: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
    1. Tabit CE, Chung WB, Hamburg NM, Vita JA. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2010;11(1):61–74. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9134-4.
    1. Williams SB, Cusco JA, Roddy MA, Johnstone MT, Creager MA. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(3):567–574. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00522-6.
    1. van den Born JC, Hammes HP, Greffrath W, van Goor H, Hillebrands JL. Gasotransmitters in vascular complications of diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65(2):331–345. doi: 10.2337/db15-1003.
    1. Sandner P. From molecules to patients: exploring the therapeutic role of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. Biol Chem. 2018;399(7):679–690. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0155.
    1. Buys ES, Zimmer DP, Chickering J, et al. Discovery and development of next generation sGC stimulators with diverse multidimensional pharmacology and broad therapeutic potential. Nitric Oxide. 2018;78:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2018.05.009.
    1. Hoffmann LS, Etzrodt J, Willkomm L, et al. Stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase protects against obesity by recruiting brown adipose tissue. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7235. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8235.
    1. Tobin JV, Zimmer DP, Shea C, et al. Pharmacological characterization of IW-1973, a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator with extensive tissue distribution, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic effects in preclinical models of disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018;365(3):664–675. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.247429.
    1. Schwartzkopf CD, Hadcock J, Jones JE, Currie M, Milne GT, Masferrer J (2018) Praliciguat, a clinical-stage sGC stimulator, improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity and lowered triglycerides in a mouse diet-induced obesity model. Diabetes 67(Suppl 1):1886
    1. Hanrahan JP, Wakefield JD, Wilson PJ, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator praliciguat in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019;8(5):564–575. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.627.
    1. Boxenbaum H, Battle M. Effective half-life in clinical pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;35(8):763–766. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04117.x.
    1. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–419. doi: 10.1007/bf00280883.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.
    1. Michelson AD. Platelet function testing in cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2004;110(19):e489–e493. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147228.29325.F9.
    1. Accriva Diagnostics. VerifyNow® PRUTest® platelet reactivity test: instructions for use. Available from: . Accessed 14 Nov 2019
    1. Accriva Diagnostics. VerifyNow® asprin platelet reactivity test: instructions for use. Available from: . Accessed 14 Nov 2019
    1. Buys ES, Ko YC, Alt C, et al. Soluble guanylate cyclase α1-deficient mice: a novel murine model for primary open angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060156.
    1. Moncada S, Higgs EA (2006) Nitric oxide and the vascular endothelium. Handb Exp Pharmacol (176 Pt 1):213–254. 10.1007/3-540-32967-6_7
    1. Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. The discovery of nitric oxide as the endogenous nitrovasodilator. Hypertension. 1988;12(4):365–372. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.12.4.365.
    1. Patvardhan EA, Heffernan KS, Ruan JM, Soffler MI, Karas RH, Kuvin JT. Assessment of vascular endothelial function with peripheral arterial tonometry: information at your fingertips? Cardiol Rev. 2010;18(1):20–28. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c46a15.
    1. Sibal L, Agarwal SC, Home PD, Boger RH. The role of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6(2):82–90. doi: 10.2174/157340310791162659.
    1. Yu E, Ruiz-Canela M, Hu FB, et al. Plasma arginine/asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio and incidence of cardiovascular events: a case-cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(6):1879–1888. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3569.
    1. Triches CB, Mayer S, Quinto BMR, Batista MC, Zanella MT. Association of endothelial dysfunction with cardiovascular risk factors and new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients with hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20(5):935–941. doi: 10.1111/jch.13269.
    1. Schlesinger S, Sonntag SR, Lieb W, Maas R. Asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine as risk markers for total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165811.
    1. Schwedhelm E, Boger RH. The role of asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginines in renal disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7(5):275–285. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.31.
    1. Pfeifer A, Kilic A, Hoffmann LS. Regulation of metabolism by cGMP. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;140(1):81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.06.001.
    1. Cheng AM, Rizzo-DeLeon N, Wilson CL, et al. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein protects against vascular inflammation and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(7):E571–E579. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00303.2014.
    1. Kang YM, Kim F, Lee WJ. Role of NO/VASP signaling pathway against obesity-related inflammation and insulin resistance. Diabetes Metab J. 2017;41(2):89–95. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2017.41.2.89.
    1. Varga T, Czimmerer Z, Nagy L. PPARs are a unique set of fatty acid regulated transcription factors controlling both lipid metabolism and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(8):1007–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.02.014.
    1. Kapil V, Milsom AB, Okorie M, et al. Inorganic nitrate supplementation lowers blood pressure in humans: role for nitrite-derived NO. Hypertension. 2010;56(2):274–281. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.153536.
    1. Ashmore T, Roberts LD, Morash AJ, et al. Nitrate enhances skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation via a nitric oxide-cGMP-PPAR-mediated mechanism. BMC Biol. 2015;13:110. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0221-6.
    1. Xie X, Chen W, Zhang N, et al. Selective tissue distribution mediates tissue-dependent PPARγ activation and insulin sensitization by INT131, a selective PPARγ modulator. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:317. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00317.
    1. Ghofrani HA, D'Armini AM, Grimminger F, et al. Riociguat for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(4):319–329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209657.
    1. Ghofrani HA, Voswinckel R, Gall H, et al. Riociguat for pulmonary hypertension. Futur Cardiol. 2013;6(2):155–166. doi: 10.2217/fca.10.5.
    1. Groneberg D, Voussen B, Friebe A (2016) Integrative control of gastrointestinal motility by nitric oxide. Curr Med Chem 23(24):2715–2735. 10.2174/0929867323666160812150907
    1. Shah V, Lyford G, Gores G, Farrugia G (2004) Nitric oxide in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology 126(3):903–913. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.046
    1. Adempas [package insert] (2018) Bayer Healthcare Inc. Available from . Accessed 15 Nov 2019
    1. Smolenski A. Novel roles of cAMP/cGMP-dependent signaling in platelets. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(2):167–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04576.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever