ROMANA 3: a phase 3 safety extension study of anamorelin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with cachexia

D Currow, J S Temel, A Abernethy, J Milanowski, J Friend, K C Fearon, D Currow, J S Temel, A Abernethy, J Milanowski, J Friend, K C Fearon

Abstract

Background: Cancer anorexia-cachexia is a debilitating condition frequently observed in NSCLC patients, characterized by decreased body weight, reduced food intake, and impaired quality of life. Anamorelin, a novel selective ghrelin receptor agonist, has anabolic and appetite-enhancing activities.

Patients and methods: ROMANA 3 was a safety extension study of two phase 3, double-blind studies that assessed safety and efficacy of anamorelin in advanced NSCLC patients with cachexia. Patients with preserved Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2 after completing 12 weeks (w) on the ROMANA 1 or ROMANA 2 trials (0-12 weeks) could enroll in ROMANA 3 and continue to receive anamorelin 100 mg or placebo once daily for an additional 12w (12-24 weeks). The primary endpoint of ROMANA 3 was anamorelin safety/tolerability (12-24 weeks). Secondary endpoints included changes in body weight, handgrip strength (HGS), and symptom burden (0-24 weeks).

Results: Of the 703 patients who completed ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2, 513 patients entered ROMANA 3 (anamorelin, N = 345, mean age 62.0 years; placebo, N = 168; mean age 62.2 years). During ROMANA 3, anamorelin and placebo groups had similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 52.2% versus 55.7%), grade ≥3 TEAEs (22.4% versus 21.6%), and serious TEAEs (12.8% versus 12.6%). There were 36 (10.5%) and 23 (13.8%) deaths in the anamorelin and placebo groups, respectively; none were drug-related. Improvements in body weight and anorexia-cachexia symptoms observed in the original trials were consistently maintained over 12-24 weeks. Anamorelin, versus placebo, significantly increased body weight from baseline of original trials at all time points (P < 0.0001) and improved anorexia-cachexia symptoms at weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16 (P < 0.05). No significant improvement in HGS was seen in either group.

Conclusion: During the 12-24 weeks ROMANA 3 trial, anamorelin continued to be well tolerated. Over the entire 0-24w treatment period, body weight and symptom burden were improved with anamorelin.

Clinical trial registration numbers: ROMANA 1 (NCT01387269), ROMANA 2 (NCT01387282), and ROMANA 3 (NCT01395914).

Keywords: ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2; ROMANA 3; anamorelin; anorexia–cachexia symptoms; body weight; non-small-cell lung cancer.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram of ROMANA 3. aPatients enrolled in ROMANA 3 stayed on their initial treatment arm (from ROMANA 1 or ROMANA 2). bNo deaths were drug related. cIncluding the patients who did not receive study drug. Patients completing the study are defined as patients finalizing the week 12/day 85 visit. AE, adverse event; ITT, intent-to-treat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Least-squares mean change (±SE) from baseline of original trials in (A) body weight and (B) FAACT Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale Domain Score during 24 weeks of treatment in patients enrolled in ROMANA 3. ITT population. aThe P value indicates a significant difference in body weight or FAACT Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale Domain Score between anamorelin- and placebo-treated patients from baseline of ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2 to each visit throughout the 0–24w treatment period and completion of extension trial (ROMANA 3) as part of the post-hoc analysis. A/CS, Anorexia/Cachexia Subscale; ANAM, anamorelin HCl; FAACT, Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment; ITT, intent-to-treat; SE, standard error.

References

    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD. et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 489–495.
    1. Von Haeling S, Anker SD.. Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2014; 5(4): 261–263.
    1. Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V.. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10: 90–99.
    1. Kimura M, Naito T, Kenmotsu H. et al. Prognostic impact of cancer cachexia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23(6): 1699–1708.
    1. Granda-Cameron C, DeMille D, Lynch MP. et al. An interdisciplinary approach to manage cancer cachexia. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2010; 14(1): 72–80.
    1. Davis MP. The emerging role of palliative medicine in the treatment of lung cancer patients. Cleve Clin J Med 2012; 79(electronic Suppl 1): eS51–eS55.
    1. Wallengren O, Lundhlom K, Bosaeus I.. Diagnostic criteria of cancer cachexia: relation to quality of life, exercise capacity and survival in unselected palliative care patients. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21(6): 1569–1577.
    1. Guillory B, Splenser A, Garcia J.. The role of ghrelin in anorexia-cachexia syndromes. Vitam Horm 2013; 92: 61–106.
    1. Lundholm K, Gunnebo L, Korner U. et al. Effects by daily long term provision of ghrelin to unselected weight-losing cancer patients: a randomized double-blind study. Cancer 2010; 116(8): 2044–2052.
    1. Hiura Y, Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K. et al. Effects of ghrelin administration during chemotherapy with advanced esophageal cancer patients: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Cancer 2012; 118: 4785–4794.
    1. Strasser F, Lutz TA, Maeder MT. et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ghrelin for cancer-related anorexia/cachexia: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-crossover study. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 300–308.
    1. Currow DC, Abernethy AP.. Anamorelin hydrochloride in the treatment of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Future Oncol 2014; 10: 789–802.
    1. Garcia JM, Friend J, Allen S.. Therapeutic potential of anamorelin, a novel, oral ghrelin mimetic, in patients with cancer-related cachexia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, pilot study. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 129–137.
    1. Garcia JM, Boccia RV, Graham CD. et al. Anamorelin for patients with cancer cachexia: an integrated analysis of two phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 108–116.
    1. Temel J, Bondarde S, Jain M. et al. Efficacy and safety of anamorelin HCl in NSCLC patients: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase II study. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49(Suppl 2): S269–S270.
    1. Temel JS, Abernethy AP, Currow DC. et al. Anamorelin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2): results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 519–531.
    1. Ribaudo JM, Cella D, Hahn EA. et al. Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 1137–1146.
    1. Heppner KM, Tong J.. Mechanisms in endocrinology: regulation of glucose metabolism by the ghrelin system: multiple players and multiple actions. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171: R21–R32.
    1. Honors MA, Kinzig KP.. The role of insulin resistance in the development of muscle wasting during cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2012; 3: 5–11.
    1. Murphy MG, Plunkett LM, Gertz BJ. et al. MK-677, an orally active growth hormone secretagogue, reverses diet-induced catabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 320–325.
    1. Vestergaard ET, Djurhuus CB, Gjedsted J. et al. Acute effects of ghrelin administration on glucose and lipid metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 438–444.
    1. Leese PT, Trang JM, Blum RA. et al. An open-label clinical trial of the effects of age and gender on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of the ghrelin receptor agonist anamorelin. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2015; 4(2): 112–120.
    1. Tuca A, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Gascón P.. Clinical evaluation and optimal management of cancer cachexia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013; 88: 625–636.
    1. Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44: 1124–1132.
    1. Rhondali W, Chisholm GB, Daneshmand M. et al. Association between body image dissatisfaction and weight loss among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a preliminary report. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45: 1039–1049.
    1. Makrantonakis PD, Galani E, Harper PG.. Non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly. Oncologist 2004; 9: 556–560.
    1. Maione P, Rossi A, Sacco PC. et al. Treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2010; 2(4): 251–260.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever