Implementation of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program at a tertiary care setting in Sri Lanka: a developing country experience

Malitha Patabendige, Hemantha Senanayake, Malitha Patabendige, Hemantha Senanayake

Abstract

Background: To study institutionalization of the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) in a tertiary care center in Sri Lanka.

Method: A hospital-based, prospective observational study was conducted in the De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Healthcare workers were educated regarding the SCC, which was to be used for each woman admitted to the labor room during the study period. A qualitatively pretested, self-administered questionnaire was given to all nursing and midwifery staff to assess knowledge and attitudes towards the checklist. Each item of the SCC was reviewed for adherence.

Results: A total of 824 births in which the checklist used were studied. There were a total of births 1800 during the period, giving an adoption rate of 45.8%. Out of the 170 health workers in the hospital (nurses, midwives and nurse midwives) 98 answered the questionnaire (response rate = 57.6%). The average number of childbirth practices checked in the checklist was 21 out of 29 (95% CI 20.2, 21.3). Educating the mother to seek help during labor, after delivery and after discharge from hospital, seeking an assistant during labor, early breast-feeding, maternal HIV infection and discussing contraceptive options were checked least often. The mean level of knowledge on the checklist among health workers was 60.1% (95% CI 57.2, 63.1). Attitudes for acceptance of using the checklist were satisfactory. Average adherence to checklist practices was 71.3%. Sixty eight (69.4%) agreed that the Checklist stimulates inter-personal communication and teamwork. Increased workload, poor enthusiasm of health workers towards new additions to their routine schedule and level of user-friendliness of Checklist were limitations to its greater use.

Conclusions: Amongst users, the attitude towards the checklist was satisfactory. Adoption rate amongst all workers was 45.8% and knowledge regarding the checklist was 60.1%. These two factors are probably linked. Therefore prior to introducing it to a facility awareness about the value and correct use of the SCC needs to be increased, while giving attention to satisfactory staffing levels.

References

    1. WHO: WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist. Available at: . [Cited on 02-10-2014]
    1. WHO: WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual. Available at:. [Cited on 02-10-2014]
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119.
    1. Spector JM, Agrawal P, Kodkany B, Lipsitz S, Lashoher A, Dziekan G, et al. Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–7.
    1. Spector JM, Lashoher A, Agrawal P, Lemer C, Dziekan G, Bahl R, et al. Designing the WHO Safe childbirth checklist program to improve quality of care at childbirth. Int J Gynae Obst. 2013;122:164–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.022.
    1. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) The State of the World’s Children 2008. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2008. p. 21.
    1. Senanayake H, Goonewardene M, Ranatunga A, Hattotuwa R, Amarasekera S, Amarasinghe I, et al. Achieving millennium development goals 4 and 5 in Sri Lanka. BJOG. 2011;118:78–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03115.x.
    1. Maternal and Child Morbidity and Mortality Surveillance Unit, Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka . Findings of Maternal Death Reviews 2011–2012. Sri Lanka: Family Health Bureau, Ministry of Health; 2013.
    1. Annual Health Statistics 2007. Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition, Sri Lanka: 2007. Available at: . [Cited on 17-02-2014]
    1. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Sri Lanka Statistics. Available at: . [Cited on 17-02-2014]
    1. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). SkilledAttendance at Birth. Available at: . [Cited on 06-10-2014]
    1. de Bernis L, Sherratt DR, AbouZahr C, Van Lerberghe W. Skilled attendants for pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal care. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:39–57. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg017.
    1. Patabendige M, Goonewardene IMR. Preconception care received by women attending antenatal clinics at a Teaching Hospital in Southern Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J Obst Gynae. 2013;35:03–9.
    1. WHO recommendations “optimizing health worker roles for maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting”. World Health Organization. 2012. Available at: . [Accessed on 06 Oct 2014]
    1. Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, Audibert F, Tourigny C, Fraser WD, et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. ObstGyne. 2006;108:1234–45.
    1. Figueras A, Narváez E, Valsecia M, Vásquez S, Rojas G, Camilo A, et al. An education and motivation intervention to change clinical management of the third stage of labor - the GIRMMAHP Initiative. Birth. 2008;35:283–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00255.x.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;11:1225–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
    1. Althabe F, Buekens P, Bergel E, Belizan JM, Campbell MK. A behavioral intervention to improve obstetrical care. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1929–1940. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa071456.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever