Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care

Claire S Leathem, Margaret E Cupples, Mary C Byrne, Mary O'Malley, Ailish Houlihan, Andrew W Murphy, Susan M Smith, Claire S Leathem, Margaret E Cupples, Mary C Byrne, Mary O'Malley, Ailish Houlihan, Andrew W Murphy, Susan M Smith

Abstract

Background: Recruitment and retention of patients and healthcare providers in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is important in order to determine the effectiveness of interventions. However, failure to achieve recruitment targets is common and reasons why a particular recruitment strategy works for one study and not another remain unclear. We sought to describe a strategy used in a multicentre RCT in primary care, to report researchers' and participants' experiences of its implementation and to inform future strategies to maximise recruitment and retention.

Methods: In total 48 general practices and 903 patients were recruited from three different areas of Ireland to a RCT of an intervention designed to optimise secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. The recruitment process involved telephoning practices, posting information, visiting practices, identifying potential participants, posting invitations and obtaining consent. Retention involved patients attending reviews and responding to questionnaires and practices facilitating data collection.

Results: We achieved high retention rates for practices (100%) and for patients (85%) over an 18-month intervention period. Pilot work, knowledge of the setting, awareness of change in staff and organisation amongst participant sites, rapid responses to queries and acknowledgement of practitioners' contributions were identified as being important. Minor variations in protocol and research support helped to meet varied, complex and changing individual needs of practitioners and patients and encouraged retention in the trial. A collaborative relationship between researcher and practice staff which required time to develop was perceived as vital for both recruitment and retention.

Conclusion: Recruiting and retaining the numbers of practices and patients estimated as required to provide findings with adequate power contributes to increased confidence in the validity and generalisability of RCT results. A continuous dynamic process of monitoring progress within trials and tailoring strategies to particular circumstances, whilst not compromising trial protocols, should allow maximal recruitment and retention.

Trial registration: ISRCTN24081411.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of Healthcare Systems in Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of Practices Approached and Recruited into SPHERE.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Belfast Region Recruitment Phone Calls.

References

    1. Wilson K, Rose K. Patient recruitment and retention strategies in randomised controlled trials. Nurse Researcher. 1998;6:35–46.
    1. Bell-Syer SEM, Klaber Moffett JA. Recruiting patients to randomized trials in primary care: principles and case study. Family Practice. 2000;17:187–191. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.187.
    1. Sellors J, Cosby R, Trim K, Kaczorowski J, Howard M, Hardcastle L, Sellors C, Woodward C. Recruiting family physicians and patients for a clinical trial: lessons learned. Family Practice. 2002;19:99–104. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.1.99.
    1. Patel MX, Doku V, Tennakoon L. Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatments. 2003;9:229–238. doi: 10.1192/apt.9.3.229.
    1. Chang B-H, Hendricks AM, Slawsky MT, Locastro JS. Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-8. Retrieved August 4, 2006.
    1. Huibers MJH, Bleijenberg G, Beurskens AJHM, Kant IJ, Knottnerus JA, Windt DAWM van der, Bazelmans E, van Schayck CP. An alternative trial design to overcome validity and recruitment problems in primary care research. Family Practice. 2004;21:213–218. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh219.
    1. Affleck P. The challenge of recruitment. Nurse Researcher. 2005;13:78–84.
    1. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. BMC Trials. 2006;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9.
    1. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lewin-van den Broek NTh, Lassen A, Vickers L, Myers P. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to RCTs in Primary care. Family Practice. 2003;20:83–92. doi: 10.1093/fampra/20.1.83.
    1. Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Family Practice. 2007;24:601–603. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm051.
    1. Medical Research Council. MRC topic review; primary health care research review. London: MRC; 1997.
    1. Borgiel AEM, Dunn EV, Lamont CT, MacDonald PJ, Evensen MK, Bass MJ, Spasoff RA, Williams JI. Recruiting Family Physicians as Participants in Research. Family Practice. 1989;6:168–172. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.3.168.
    1. Ward E, King M, Lloyd M, Bower P, Friedli K. Conducting randomised trials in general practice: methodological and practical issues. British Journal General of Practice. 1999;49:919–922.
    1. Silagy CA, Carson NE. Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Family Practice. 1989;6:173–176. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.3.173.
    1. Windt DA van der, Koes BW, van Aarst M, Heemskerk MA, Bouter LM. Practical aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care: patient recruitment and outcome assessment. British Journal of General Practice. 2000;50:371–374.
    1. Stanford PD, Monte DA, Briggs FM, Flynn PM, Tanney M, Ellenberg JH, Clingan KL, Rodgers AS. Recruitment and retention of Adolescent participants in HIV Research: Findings from the REACH Project. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2003;32:192–203. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00392-0.
    1. Wall M, Teeland L. Non-participants in a preventive health examination for cardiovascular disease: characteristics, reasons for non participation, and willingness to participate in the future. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:248–251. doi: 10.1080/02813430410006611.
    1. Smith SM. Randomised Controlled Trials in Irish General Practice. Irish Medical Journal. 2004;97:215–216.
    1. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to Participation in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1999;52:1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9.
    1. Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA. Problems in Recruiting Community-based Physicians for Health Services Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2000;15:591–599. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x.
    1. Lloyd-Williams F, Mair F, Shiels C, Hanratty B, Goldstein P, Beaton S, Capewell S, Lye M, McDonald R, Roberts C, Connelly D. Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in every day practice? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003;56:1157–1162. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00205-1.
    1. Jancey J, Howatt P, Lee A, Clarke A, Shilton T, Fisher J, Iredell H. Effective Recruitment and Retention of Older Adults in Physical Activity Research: PALS Study. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30:626–635.
    1. Harris R, Dyson E. Recruitment of frail older people to research: lessons learnt through experience. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001;36:643–651. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02029.x.
    1. Murphy AW, Cupples ME, Smith SM, Byrne M, Leathem C, Byrne MC. The SPHERE Study. Secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of tailored practice and patient care plans with parallel qualitative, economic and policy analyses. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2005;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1468-6708-6-11.
    1. Badger F, Werrett J. Room for improvement? Reporting response rates and recruitment in nursing research in the past decade. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;51:502–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03521.x.
    1. Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC; 2000.
    1. Corrigan M, Cupples ME, Smith SM, Byrne M, Leathem CS, Clerkin P, Murphy AW. Developing a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in two different healthcare systems: the contribution of qualitative methods. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6:90. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-90.
    1. Kelleher CC, Friel S, Nic Gabhainn S, Tay JB. Socio demographic predictors of self-rated health in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the National Survey on Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition, SLAN. Social Science & Medicine. 2003;57:477–486. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00371-4.
    1. Department of Health. Investing in General Practice: The New General Medical Services Contract. 2004.
    1. Spillane V, Byrne MC, Byrne M, Leathem CS, O'Malley M, Cupples ME. Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;60:343–352.
    1. Whitebird RR, Zimmaro BD, Hase KA, Savik K. Commumity-Based Recruitment and Enrollment for a clinical Trial on the Sensitive Issue of Fecal Incontinence: The Fiber study. Research in Nursing and Health. 2006;29:223–243. doi: 10.1002/nur.20130.
    1. Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Conn S, Maxwell M, Thomasberg ML, Brekke M, Brekke J. A comparison of two methods to recruit physicians to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1477–81. doi: 10.1001/archinte.150.7.1477.
    1. Dolan G, Broomfield J, Lewith G, Watkins A. Operational and resource management of an RCT: some of the pitfalls and lessons learned. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 1999;8:389–395. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00256.x.
    1. Campbell NC, Thain J, Deans HG, Ritchie LD, Rawles JM. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice. British Medical Journal. 1998;316:1430–1434.
    1. Wiles R, Kinmouth A-L. Patients' understanding of heart attack: implications for prevention of recurrence. Patient Education & Counselling. 2001;44:161–169. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00187-7.
    1. Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H, Timmins A, Jones M. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomized trial of 'opt-in' versus 'opt-out' strategies. British Medical Journal. 2005;331:940–942. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. McKinstry B, Hammersley V, Daly F, Sullivan F. Recruitment and retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Bell's palsy: A case study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-15.
    1. Moher M, Yudkin P, Wright L, Turner R, Fuller A, Schofield T. Cluster randomised trials to compare methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. British Medical Journal. 2001;322:1338–42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1338.
    1. Ward J. General Practitioners' Experience of Research. Family Practice. 1994;11:418–423. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.418.
    1. Whalley D, Bojke C, Gravelle H, Sibbald B. GP job satisfaction in view of contract reform: A national survey. British Journal of General Practice. 2006;56:87–92.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever