The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

E Shelley Hwang, Terry Hyslop, Thomas Lynch, Elizabeth Frank, Donna Pinto, Desiree Basila, Deborah Collyar, Antonia Bennett, Celia Kaplan, Shoshana Rosenberg, Alastair Thompson, Anna Weiss, Ann Partridge, E Shelley Hwang, Terry Hyslop, Thomas Lynch, Elizabeth Frank, Donna Pinto, Desiree Basila, Deborah Collyar, Antonia Bennett, Celia Kaplan, Shoshana Rosenberg, Alastair Thompson, Anna Weiss, Ann Partridge

Abstract

Introduction: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer. With guideline concordant care (GCC), DCIS outcomes are at least as favourable as some other early stage cancer types such as prostate cancer, for which active surveillance (AS) is a standard of care option. However, AS has not yet been tested in relation to DCIS. The goal of the COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial for low-risk DCIS is to gather evidence to help future patients consider the range of treatment choices for low-risk DCIS, from standard therapies to AS. The trial will determine whether there may be some women who do not substantially benefit from current GCC and who could thus be safely managed with AS. This protocol is version 5 (11 July 2018). Any future protocol amendments will be submitted to Quorum Centralised Institutional Review Board/local institutional review boards for approval via the sponsor of the study (Alliance Foundation Trials).

Methods and analysis: COMET is a phase III, randomised controlled clinical trial for patients with low-risk DCIS. The primary outcome is ipsilateral invasive breast cancer rate in women undergoing GCC compared with AS. Secondary objectives will be to compare surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes. Patients randomised to the GCC group will undergo surgery as well as radiotherapy when appropriate; those in the AS group will be monitored closely with surgery only on identification of invasive breast cancer. Patients in both the GCC and AS groups will have the option of endocrine therapy. The total planned accrual goal is 1200 patients.

Ethics and dissemination: The COMET trial will be subject to biannual formal review at the Alliance Foundation Data Safety Monitoring Board meetings. Interim analyses for futility/safety will be completed annually, with reporting following Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines for non-inferiority trials.

Trial registration number: NCT02926911; Pre-results.

Keywords: active surveillance; breast cancer; clinical trial; ductal carcinoma in situ; non-invasive; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COMET trial schema. Patient flow for accrual and registration. Eligibility criteria for low-risk DCIS include 40 years of age or older, grade I/II DCIS without invasive breast cancer diagnosed on core, vacuum-assisted or surgical biopsy; ER(+) and/or PR(+); HER2(−); and no mass on physical examination or imaging with exception of fibroadenoma at a distinct/separate site from the site of DCIS. The primary study endpoint on which the sample size is based is rate of 2-year invasive breast cancer diagnosis among patients randomised to GCC compared with AS. ITT analyses adjusted for drop-out, non-compliance and contamination will be performed on all randomised patients including those who do and do not accept the arm to which they are randomised. Patient-reported outcome surveys will be collected from all patients who are registered for the study, including those who crossover. Mammograms will be performed q6 months for the index breast and q12 months for the contralateral breast in the AS arm and q12 months in both the index and contralateral breast in the GCC arm. No chest wall imaging will be performed if mastectomy has been performed. AS, active surveillance; COMET, Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; ER(+), oestrogen receptor positive; GCC, guideline concordant care; HER2 (−), human epidermal growth factor 2 negative; ITT, intention to treat; PR(+), progesterone receptor positive; q, every.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surveillance protocol for COMET trial. Mammogram (MMG) not required if mastectomy performed. **Criteria for progression: (A) New mass/architectural distortion/density on surveillance MMG in either breast according to American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; (B) Increase in extent of calcifications ≥5 mm in at least one dimension compared with the most recent prior MMG of the index breast; (C) New suspicious findings on other radiological studies (ultrasound, MRI) in either breast. AS, active surveillance; COMET, Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; GCC, guideline concordant care; SoC, standard of care.

References

    1. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. . Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1546–54. 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546
    1. Cancer Facts and Figures. Special section: breast carcinoma in situ. (Accessed 15 May 2018).
    1. Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J, et al. . The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;97:135–44. 10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z
    1. Ozanne EM, Shieh Y, Barnes J, et al. . Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;129:165–73. 10.1007/s10549-011-1430-5
    1. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:605–13. 10.1093/jnci/djq099
    1. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, et al. . The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Br J Cancer 2013;108:2205–40. 10.1038/bjc.2013.177
    1. NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Announces Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania as New Member Institution. (Accessed 5 May 2018).
    1. Worni M, Greenup R, Akushevich I, et al. . Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for DCIS: a SEER population-based analysis. J Clin Oncol ASCO 2014 Meeting Abstracts 2014.
    1. Wallis MG, Clements K, Kearins O, et al. . The effect of DCIS grade on rate, type and time to recurrence after 15 years of follow-up of screen-detected DCIS. Br J Cancer 2012;106:1611–7. 10.1038/bjc.2012.151
    1. Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain 2011;12:725–46. 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005
    1. Schreiber KL, Martel MO, Shnol H, et al. . Persistent pain in postmastectomy patients: comparison of psychophysical, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics between patients with and without pain. Pain 2013;154:660–8. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.015
    1. Bruce J, Thornton AJ, Powell R, et al. . Psychological, surgical, and sociodemographic predictors of pain outcomes after breast cancer surgery: a population-based cohort study. Pain 2014;155:232–43. 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.028
    1. Bruce J, Thornton AJ, Scott NW, et al. . Chronic preoperative pain and psychological robustness predict acute postoperative pain outcomes after surgery for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2012;107:937–46. 10.1038/bjc.2012.341
    1. Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R, et al. . Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:djv263 10.1093/jnci/djv263
    1. Dunn G, Maracy M, Tomenson B. Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods. Stat Methods Med Res 2005;14:369–95. 10.1191/0962280205sm403oa
    1. Kim MY. Using the instrumental variables estimator to analyze noninferiority trials with noncompliance. J Biopharm Stat 2010;20:745–58. 10.1080/10543401003618157
    1. Cuzick J, Edwards R, Segnan N. Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 1997;16:1017–29. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::AID-SIM508>;2-V
    1. Kurniawan ED, Rose A, Mou A, et al. . Risk factors for invasive breast cancer when core needle biopsy shows ductal carcinoma in situ. Arch Surg 2010;145:1098–104. 10.1001/archsurg.2010.243
    1. Soumian S, Verghese ET, Booth M, et al. . Concordance between vacuum assisted biopsy and postoperative histology: implications for the proposed Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS). Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:1337–40. 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.028
    1. Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, 2008.
    1. Maxwell AJ, Clements K, Hilton B, et al. . Risk factors for the development of invasive cancer in unresected ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44:429–35. 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.12.007
    1. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, et al. . Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594–604. 10.1001/jama.2012.87802
    1. Grimm LJ, Ryser MD, Partridge AH, et al. . Surgical upstaging rates for vacuum assisted biopsy proven dcis: implications for active surveillance trials. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:3534–40. 10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9
    1. Welch HG. Black WC: Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:605–13.
    1. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. . 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1415–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
    1. Leapman MS, Cowan JE, Nguyen HG, et al. . Active Surveillance in Younger Men With Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1898–904. 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.0058
    1. Francis A, Fallowfield L, Rea D. The LORIS Trial: Addressing overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Oncol 2015;27:6–8. 10.1016/j.clon.2014.09.015
    1. LORIS. A Phase III trial of surgery versus active monitoring for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). (Accessed 5 May 2018).
    1. . is a database of privately and publicly funded clinical studies conducted around the world. (Accessed 15 May 2018).
    1. PRECISION. PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now). (Accessed 15 May 2018).
    1. D’Orsi CJ SE, Mendelson EB, et al. . BI-RADS® Atlas ACRReston. VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.
    1. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. . Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:78–93. 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78
    1. Bach PB, Schrag D, Brawley OW, et al. . Survival of blacks and whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA 2002;287:2106–13. 10.1001/jama.287.16.2106
    1. Pollitt RA, Swetter SM, Johnson TM, et al. . Examining the pathways linking lower socioeconomic status and advanced melanoma. Cancer 2012;118:4004–13. 10.1002/cncr.26706
    1. Blinder VS, Eberle CE, Patil S, et al. . Correlates of work status during adjuvant chemo- or radiation therapy for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016;34:6556 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.6556
    1. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, et al. . The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:156–63. 10.1002/art.10993
    1. Burstein HJ, Gelber S, Guadagnoli E, et al. . Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1999;340:1733–9. 10.1056/NEJM199906033402206
    1. Voils CI, Maciejewski ML, Hoyle RH, et al. . Initial validation of a self-report measure of the extent of and reasons for medication nonadherence. Med Care 2012;50:1013–9. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e121
    1. Godin G, Shephard RJ. Godin leisure-time exercise questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:S36–38.
    1. Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Holmes MD, et al. . Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3527–34. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0855
    1. Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, et al. . Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3535–41. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0863
    1. Beasley JM, Kwan ML, Chen WY, et al. . Meeting the physical activity guidelines and survival after breast cancer: findings from the after breast cancer pooling project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;131:637–43. 10.1007/s10549-011-1770-1
    1. Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, et al. . Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA 2005;293:2479–86. 10.1001/jama.293.20.2479
    1. Peters EN, Torres E, Toll BA, et al. . Tobacco assessment in actively accruing national cancer institute cooperative group program clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2869–75. 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8815
    1. Land SR, Cronin WM, Wickerham DL, et al. . Cigarette smoking, obesity, physical activity, and alcohol use as predictors of chemoprevention adherence in the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project p-1 breast cancer prevention trial. Cancer Prev Res 2011;4:1393–400. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0172
    1. Braithwaite D, Izano M, Moore DH, et al. . Smoking and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: a prospective observational study and systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;136:521–33. 10.1007/s10549-012-2276-1
    1. Ligibel J. Lifestyle factors in cancer survivorship. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3697–704. 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.0638
    1. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA, et al. . Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the women’s intervention nutrition study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1767–76. 10.1093/jnci/djj494
    1. Paxton AE, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, et al. . Starting the conversation performance of a brief dietary assessment and intervention tool for health professionals. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:67–71. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.009
    1. Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al. . Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA 2007;298:754–64. 10.1001/jama.298.7.754
    1. Meyerhardt JA, Sato K, Niedzwiecki D, et al. . Dietary glycemic load and cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:1702–11. 10.1093/jnci/djs399
    1. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 1992;31:301–6. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401.
    1. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 1997;4:92–100. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
    1. Freeston MH, Rhéaume J, Letarte H, et al. . Why do people worry? Pers Individ Dif 1994;17:791–802. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5
    1. Buhr K, Dugas MJ. The Intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the english version. Behav Res Ther 2002;40:931–45. 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4
    1. Tan HJ, Marks LS, Hoyt MA, et al. . The Relationship between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Anxiety in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2016;195:1724–30. 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.108
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
    1. Burstein HJ, Gelber S, Guadagnoli E, et al. . Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1733–9. 10.1056/NEJM199906033402206
    1. Godin G, Shephard RJ. Godin leisure-time exercise questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:S36–8.
    1. Avis NE, Smith KW, McGraw S, et al. . Assessing quality of life in adult cancer survivors (QLACS). Qual Life Res 2005;14:1007–23. 10.1007/s11136-004-2147-2
    1. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. . Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345–53. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
    1. Stanton AL, Bernaards CA, Ganz PA. The BCPT symptom scales: a measure of physical symptoms for women diagnosed with or at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:448–56. 10.1093/jnci/dji069
    1. Belfer I, Schreiber KL, Shaffer JR, et al. . Persistent postmastectomy pain in breast cancer survivors: analysis of clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors. J Pain 2013;14:1185–95. 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.002
    1. Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, et al. . Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA 2009;302:1985–92. 10.1001/jama.2009.1568
    1. Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Chang Y, et al. . Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012;12:51 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51
    1. Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Silvia K, et al. . An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ Couns 2007;65:261–9. 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.007
    1. Bluman LG, Borstelmann NA, Rimer BK, et al. . Knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived cancer risk among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001;10:589–98. 10.1089/15246090152543175
    1. Lerman C, Croyle R. Psychological issues in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:609–16. 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420060027003
    1. Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, et al. . Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 2003;23:281–92. 10.1177/0272989X03256005
    1. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995;15:25–30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105
    1. Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, et al. . Are you SURE?: assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:e308–14.
    1. Rosenberg SM, Tracy MS, Meyer ME, et al. . Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:373–81. 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003
    1. Kent EE, Forsythe LP, Yabroff KR, et al. . Are survivors who report cancer-related financial problems more likely to forgo or delay medical care? Cancer 2013;119:3710–7. 10.1002/cncr.28262
    1. van Ryn M, Sanders S, Kahn K, et al. . Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue? Psychooncology 2011;20:44–52. 10.1002/pon.1703

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever