Effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on enamel remineralization and estimation of fissure sealant bond strength to remineralized tooth surfaces: an in vitro study

Mahtab Memarpour, Fereshteh Shafiei, Azade Rafiee, Mina Soltani, Mohammad Hossein Dashti, Mahtab Memarpour, Fereshteh Shafiei, Azade Rafiee, Mina Soltani, Mohammad Hossein Dashti

Abstract

Background: The management of noncavitated caries lesions before sealant therapy is a clinical challenge when the tooth needs sealant application. Sealing noncavitated carious lesions in pits and fissures may lead to failure of the fissure sealant (FS) due to incomplete sealing. Therefore the use of remineralizing agents such as nanoparticles has been suggested. This study investigated the ability of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nano-HA) to remineralize enamel, and their effect on sealant microleakage and shear bond strength (SBS).

Methods: A total of 192 third molars were demineralized and pretreated with two concentrations of nano-HA with and without sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP), followed by phosphoric acid etching and resin FS application. The study groups were 1) etching + FS, 2) etching + nano-HA 0.15% + FS, 3) etching + nano-HA 0.03% + FS, 4) etching + mixture of nano-HA 0.15% and SHMP 0.05% + FS, 5) etching + mixture of nano-HA 0.03% + SHMP 0.01% + FS. The laboratory tests included microleakage in 50 teeth, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation in 10 samples, and SBS in 100 samples. Enamel remineralization changes were evaluated in 32 teeth with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM).

Results: Nano-HA enhanced the SBS to remineralized enamel in a large percentage of nanoparticles. Mean SBS in group 2 was significantly greater than in groups 1, 3 and 4 (all P < 0.05). SBS was related to nano-HA concentration: nano-HA 0.15% yielded greater SBS (16.8 ± 2.7) than the 0.03% concentration (14.2 ± 2.1). However, its effect on microleakage was not significant. Nano-HA with or without SHMP led to enhanced enamel remineralization; however, the Calcium (Ca)/Phosphate (P) weight percent values did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). SEM images showed that SHMP did not affect sealant penetration into the deeper parts of fissures. FESEM images showed that adding SHMP led to increased nanoparticle dispersal on the tooth surface and less cluster formation.

Conclusions: The ultraconservative approach (combining nano-HA 0.15% and SHMP) and FS may be considered a minimal intervention in dentistry to seal demineralized enamel pits and fissures.

Keywords: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Pit and fissure sealant; Remineralization.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing the methods used in this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SEM images of demineralized etched enamel and resin sealant adaptation on the interface (group 1). The white arrow shows the non-infiltrated area. The black arrow and circle show the infiltrated area. Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SEM image of nano-HA (0.15%) deposition on the pretreated enamel surface (group 2). The white arrow shows the non-infiltrated area. The black arrow and circle show the infiltrated area. Abbreviations: nano-HA, nanohydroxyapatite
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
SEM image of nano-HA (0.03%) deposition on the tooth surface, showing absence of nanoparticle infiltration in some areas (group 3). The white arrow shows the non-infiltrated area. The black arrow and circle show the infiltrated area
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
SEM image of nano-HA dispersal across a larger area in group 4 (nano-HA 0.15% + SHMP 0.05%) compared to group 2. The black arrow and circle show the infiltrated area
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
SEM image of nano-HA dispersal across a larger area in group 5(nano-HA 0.03% + SHMP 0.01%) compared to group 4
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mean Ca/P wt% ratio in experimental groups under different conditions
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Mean ZAF-corrected Ca/P ratio in experimental groups under different conditions
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) image from group 2 showing spherical nanoparticles dispersed on the enamel. The white arrow shows spherical nanoparticles
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
FESEM image from group 3 showing fewer nanoparticles and less particle clustering
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
FESEM image from group 4 showing spherical nanoparticles dispersed on the enamel
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
FESEM image from group 5 showing nano-HA dispersal without cluster formation

References

    1. SO G, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch BF. CDC dental sealant systematic review work group, et al. the effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87(2):169–174. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700211.
    1. Use of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(6):156–172.
    1. Deery C. Clinical practice guidelines proposed the use of pit and fissure sealants to prevent and arrest Noncavitated carious lesions. J Evid Based Dent pract. 2017;17(1):48–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.01.008.
    1. Polk DE, Weyant RJ, Shah NH, Fellows JL, Pihlstrom DJ, Frantsve-Hawley J. Barriers to sealant guideline implementation within a multi-site managed care dental practice. BMC oral health. 2018;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0480-z.
    1. Fontana M, Platt JA, Eckert GJ, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Yoder K, Zero DT, et al. Monitoring of sound and carious surfaces under sealants over 44 months. J Dent Res. 2014;93(11):1070–1075. doi: 10.1177/0022034514551753.
    1. Fumes AC, Longo DL, De Rossi A, Fidalgo T, de Paula ESFWG, Borsatto MC, et al. Microleakage of sealants after phosphoric acid, Er: YAG laser and air abrasion enamel conditioning: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(3):167–172. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.3.167.
    1. Chiang ML, Birlbauer S, Lo YF, Pitchika V, Crispin A, Ilie N, et al. Which factors influence the shear bond strength of sealant materials? J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(5):397–404.
    1. Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Schmidl R, Schüller C, Frank W, Werth VD. Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int J Oral Sci. 2017;9(2):117–124. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2017.15.
    1. Borges BC, Campos GB, da Silveira AD, de Lima KC, Pinheiro IV. Efficacy of a pit and fissure sealant in arresting dentin non-cavitated caries: a 1-year follow-up, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. Am J Dent 2010;23(6):311–316.
    1. Muller-Bolla M, Courson F, Lupi-Pegurier L, Tardieu C, Mohit S, Staccini P, et al. Effectiveness of resin-based sealants with and without fluoride placed in a high caries risk population: multicentric 2-year randomized clinical trial. Caries Res. 2018;52(4):312–322. doi: 10.1159/000486426.
    1. Delben AC, Cannon M, Vieira AE, Basso MD, Danelon M, Santo MR, et al. Analysis of anticaries potential of pit and fissures sealants containing amorphous calcium phosphate using synchrotron microtomography. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):218–223. doi: 10.2341/13-325-L.
    1. Borges BC, Catelan A, Sasaki RT, Ambrosano GM, Reis AF, Aguiar FH. Effect of the application of a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste and adhesive systems on bond durability of a fissure sealant. Odontology. 2013;101(1):52–59. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0062-5.
    1. Burbank BD, Cooper RL, Kava A, Hartjes JM, McHale WA, Latta MA, et al. Ion release and in vitro enamel fluoride uptake associated with pit and fissure sealants containing microencapsulated remineralizing agents. Am J Dent. 2017;30(2):59–64.
    1. Shinonaga Y, Arita K, Nishimura T, Chiu SY, Chiu HH, Abe Y, et al. Effects of porous-hydroxyapatite incorporated into glass-ionomer sealants. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):196–202. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-195.
    1. Tavassoli-Hojjati S, Atai M, Haghgoo R, Rahimian-Imam S, Kameli S, Ahmaian-Babaki F, et al. Comparison of various concentrations of tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles on mechanical properties and remineralization of fissure sealants. J Dent (Tehran, Iran) 2014;11(4):379–388.
    1. Salas-Lopez EK, Pierdant-Perez M, Hernandez-Sierra JF, Ruiz F, Mandeville P, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Effect of silver nanoparticle-added pit and fissure sealant in the prevention of dental caries in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(1):48–52. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.1.48.
    1. Cheng L, Zhang K, Weir MD, Melo MA, Zhou X, Xu HH. Nanotechnology strategies for antibacterial and remineralizing composites and adhesives to tackle dental caries. Nanomedicine (London, England) 2015;10(4):627–641. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.191.
    1. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanotechnology and its role in caries therapy. Adv Dent Res. 2012;24(2):53–57. doi: 10.1177/0022034512450446.
    1. Nozari A, Ajami S, Rafiei A, Niazi E. Impact of Nano hydroxyapatite, Nano silver fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish on primary teeth enamel remineralization: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(9):Zc97–zc100.
    1. Pepla E, Besharat LK, Palaia G, Tenore G, Migliau G. Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature. Ann Stomatol. 2014;5(3):108–114.
    1. Vandiver J, Dean D, Patel N, Bonfield W, Ortiz C. Nanoscale variation in surface charge of synthetic hydroxyapatite detected by chemically and spatially specific high-resolution force spectroscopy. Biomaterials. 2005;26:271–283. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.053.
    1. Lee JJ, Lee YK, Choi BJ, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Son HK, et al. Physical properties of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement modified with micro and nano-hydroxyapatite. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;10(8):5270–5276. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2010.2422.
    1. Tschoppe P, Zandim DL, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Enamel and dentine remineralization by nano-hydroxyapatite toothpastes. J Dent. 2011;39(6):430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.008.
    1. Besinis A, van Noort R, Martin N. The use of acetone to enhance the infiltration of HA nanoparticles into a demineralized dentin collagen matrix. Dent Mater. 2016;32(3):385–393. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.010.
    1. Besinis A, van Noort R, Martin N. Infiltration of demineralized dentin with silica and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Dent Mater. 2012;28(9):1012–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.007.
    1. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP. Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res. 1982;16(3):201–210. doi: 10.1159/000260599.
    1. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of shear bond strength, penetration ability, microleakage and remineralisation capacity of glass ionomer-based fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016;17(1):17–23.
    1. Huang S, Gao S, Cheng L, Yu H. Remineralization potential of nano-hydroxyapatite on initial enamel lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res. 2011;45(5):460–468. doi: 10.1159/000331207.
    1. Huang S, Gao S, Cheng L, Yu H. Combined effects of nano-hydroxyapatite and Galla chinensis on remineralisation of initial enamel lesion in vitro. J Dent. 2010;38(10):811–819. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.013.
    1. Memarpour M, Shafiei F. Comparison of 3 one-bottle adhesives on fissure sealant microleakage: an in vitro study. J Dent Child. 2013;80(1):16–19.
    1. Kakaboura A, Matthaiou L, Papagiannoulis L. In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(4):205–209.
    1. Stavridakis MM, Favez V, Campos EA, Krejci I. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation before and after in vitro thermal and mechanical stressing. Oper Dent. 2003;28(4):403–414.
    1. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 1990;69(1):36–39. doi: 10.1177/00220345900690010501.
    1. Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):286–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x.
    1. Guerra I, Cardell C. Optimizing use of the structural chemical analyser (variable pressure FESEM-EDX Raman spectroscopy) on micro-size complex historical paintings characterization. J Microsc. 2015;260(1):47–61. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12265.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever