Interference of functional dual-tasks on gait in untrained people with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls: a cross-sectional study

Constanza San Martín Valenzuela, Lirios Dueñas Moscardó, Juan López-Pascual, Pilar Serra-Añó, José M Tomás, Constanza San Martín Valenzuela, Lirios Dueñas Moscardó, Juan López-Pascual, Pilar Serra-Añó, José M Tomás

Abstract

Background: In Parkinson's disease (PD) population, performing secondary tasks while walking further deteriorates gait and restrict mobility in functional contexts of daily life. This study (1) analyzed the interference of functional cognitive and motor secondary task on untrained people with PD and (2) compared their walking with healthy subjects.

Methods: Forty people with PD (aged 66.72 [7.5] years, Hoehn and Yahr stage I-II-III, on-medication) composed the PD group (PDG) and 43 participants (aged 66.60 [8.75] years) formed the group of healthy counterparts (HG). Gait was evaluated through spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic outcomes in five conditions: single task (ST) and visual, verbal, auditory and motor dual-task (DT).

Results: The velocity, stride length, and braking force performance of both groups was statistically higher in the ST condition than in verbal, auditory and motor DT (p < .05), and inferior in double support time and midstance force (p < .05). The same pattern was observed when compared the ST and visual DT condition, where participants showed a significantly higher stride length, double support time and braking force in the ST (p < .05). In addition, the PDG exhibited a significant shorter double support time and midstance force, and showed a higher braking force in the visual DT than in the verbal DT (p < .05). Similarly, the PDG showed a wider stride in the visual DT than in the motor DT condition (p < .05). PDG participants had a significantly lower performance than the HG in all the variables analyzed except for the maximum hip extension in the stance phase (p > .05).

Conclusions: In untrained participants with PD, verbal and motor secondary tasks affect gait significantly, while auditory and visual tasks interfere to a lesser extent. Untrained people with PD have a poorer gait performance than their healthy counterparts, but in different grades according to the analyzed variables.

Trial registration: The data in this paper are part of a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial and correspond to the evaluations performed before a physical rehabilitation program, retrospectively registered with the number at clinicaltrial.govNCT04038866.

Keywords: Biomechanical gait analysis; Functional dual-task; Kinematics; Kinetic; Parkinson’s disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Author Pilar Serra-Añó is an Associate Editor of this journal. Apart from this, the authors declare that they have no more competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gait performance of both groups in all conditions of study. Mean and standard deviation represented with the vertical lines for the Parkinson’s disease group (PDG, dashed line) and the healthy group (HG, continuous line) for the Single-task (ST), visual (viDT), verbal (veDT), auditory (aDT) and motor (mDT) dual-task conditions. The upper horizontal black lines represent the statistical differences between single-task and dual-task conditions, while the differences between dual conditions are represented in blue. The letters below each horizontal line indicate statistically significant differences of the Parkinson’s disease group (a) and statistically significant differences of the healthy group (b)

References

    1. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:368–376. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045.
    1. Soh S-E, McGinley JL, Watts JJ, Iansek R, Murphy AT, Menz HB, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease: a path analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1543–1553. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0289-1.
    1. Tan D, Danoudis M, McGinley J, Morris ME. Relationships between motor aspects of gait impairments and activity limitations in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.07.014.
    1. Kelly VE, Eusterbrock AJ, Shumway-Cook A. A review of dual-task walking deficits in people with Parkinson’s disease: motor and cognitive contributions, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Parkinson’s Disease. 2012;918719.
    1. Sofuwa O, Nieuwboer A, Desloovere K, Willems A-M, Chavret F, Jonkers I. Quantitative gait analysis in Parkinson’s disease: comparison with a healthy control group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.012.
    1. Beauchet O, Berrut G. Gait and dual-task: definition, interest, and perspectives in the elderly. Psychologie et NeuroPsychiatrie du Vieillissement. 2006;4:215–225.
    1. Raffegeau TE, Krehbiel LM, Kang N, Thijs FJ, Altmann LJP, Cauraugh JH, et al. A meta-analysis: Parkinson’s disease and dual-task walking. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;62:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.12.012.
    1. Eric R. Kandel, James H. Schwartz, Thomas M. Jessell, Steven a. Siegelbaum, A. J. Hudspeth. Principles of neural science. Fifth edition. McGraw-Hill Medical: United States of America; 2013.
    1. Eisinger RS, Cernera S, Gittis A, Gunduz A, Okun MS. A review of basal ganglia circuits and physiology: application to deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;59:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.009.
    1. Isella V, Mapelli C, Morielli N, De Gaspari D, Siri C, Pezzoli G, et al. Validity and metric of MiniMental Parkinson and MiniMental state examination in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci. 2013;34:1751–1758. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1328-6.
    1. Morris ME, McGinley J, Huxham F, Collier J, Iansek R. Constraints on the kinetic, kinematic and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mov Sci. 1999;18:461–483. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00020-2.
    1. Brauer SG, Morris ME. Can people with Parkinson’s disease improve dual tasking when walking? Gait & Posture. 2010;31:229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.011.
    1. Baron EI, Miller Koop M, Streicher MC, Rosenfeldt AB, Alberts JL. Altered kinematics of arm swing in Parkinson’s disease patients indicates declines in gait under dual-task conditions. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;48:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.12.017.
    1. Rochester L, Galna B, Lord S, Burn D. The nature of dual-task interference during gait in incident Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2014;265:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.041.
    1. Logan D, Kiemel T, Dominici N, Cappellini G, Ivanenko Y, Lacquaniti F, et al. The many roles of vision during walking. Exp Brain Res. 2010;206:337–350. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2414-0.
    1. de Luna RA, Mihailovic A, Nguyen AM, Friedman DS, Gitlin LN, Ramulu PY. The Association of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss and Balance. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017;6(3):8. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.8.
    1. Suarez H, Geisinger D, Ferreira ED, Nogueira S, Arocena S, Roman CS, et al. Balance in Parkinson’s disease patients changing the visual input. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2011;77:651–655. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000500019.
    1. Wu T, Hallett M. Neural correlates of dual task performance in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:760–766. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.126599.
    1. Canning CG. The effect of directing attention during walking under dual-task conditions in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11:95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.09.006.
    1. Wu T, Liu J, Zhang H, Hallett M, Zheng Z, Chan P. Attention to automatic movements in Parkinson’s disease: modified automatic mode in the striatum. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:3330–3342. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu135.
    1. de Roiz R. M, Cacho EWA, Pazinatto MM, Reis JG, Cliquet a. Barasnevicius-Quagliato EMA Gait analysis comparing Parkinson’s disease with healthy elderly subjects Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68:81–86.
    1. Grabli D, Karachi C, Welter M-L, Lau B, Hirsch EC, Vidailhet M, et al. Normal and pathological gait: what we learn from Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(10):979–985. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302263.
    1. Anna C, Serena F, Maurizio F. Del Sorbo Francesca, Romito Luigi M., Elia Antonio E., et al. quantitative gait analysis in parkin disease: possible role of dystonia. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1720–1728. doi: 10.1002/mds.26672.
    1. Morris M, Iansek R, McGinley J, Matyas T, Huxham F. Three-dimensional gait biomechanics in Parkinson’s disease: evidence for a centrally mediated amplitude regulation disorder. Mov Disord. 2005;20:40–50. doi: 10.1002/mds.20278.
    1. Peterson CL, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Braking and propulsive impulses increase with speed during accelerated and decelerated walking. Gait Posture. 2011;33:562–567. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.01.010.
    1. Chiu M-C, Wang M-J. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait & Posture. 2007;25:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.008.
    1. Muniz AMS, Liu H, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Liu W, Nobre FF, et al. Comparison among probabilistic neural network, support vector machine and logistic regression for evaluating the effect of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease on ground reaction force during gait. J Biomech. 2010;43:720–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.018.
    1. Chastan N, Do MC, Bonneville F, Torny F, Bloch F, Westby GWM, et al. Gait and balance disorders in Parkinson’s disease: impaired active braking of the fall of Centre of gravity. Mov Disord. 2009;24:188–195. doi: 10.1002/mds.22269.
    1. Perneger T. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316(7139):1236–1238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever