Effect of Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH 1-H) in patients with inclusion-body myositis

Marinos C Dalakas, Goran Rakocevic, Jens Schmidt, Mohammad Salajegheh, Beverly McElroy, Michael O Harris-Love, Joseph A Shrader, Ellen W Levy, James Dambrosia, Robert L Kampen, David A Bruno, Allan D Kirk, Marinos C Dalakas, Goran Rakocevic, Jens Schmidt, Mohammad Salajegheh, Beverly McElroy, Michael O Harris-Love, Joseph A Shrader, Ellen W Levy, James Dambrosia, Robert L Kampen, David A Bruno, Allan D Kirk

Abstract

Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most common disabling, adult-onset, inflammatory myopathy histologically characterized by intense inflammation and vacuolar degeneration. In spite of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and persistent, clonally expanded and antigen-driven endomysial T cells, the disease is resistant to immunotherapies. Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that causes an immediate depletion or severe reduction of peripheral blood lymphocytes, lasting at least 6 months. We designed a proof-of-principle study to examine if one series of Alemtuzumab infusions in sIBM patients depletes not only peripheral blood lymphocytes but also endomysial T cells and alters the natural course of the disease. Thirteen sIBM patients with established 12-month natural history data received 0.3 mg/kg/day Alemtuzumab for 4 days. The study was powered to capture > or =10% increase strength 6 months after treatment. The primary end-point was disease stabilization compared to natural history, assessed by bi-monthly Quantitative Muscle Strength Testing and Medical Research Council strength measurements. Lymphocytes and T cell subsets were monitored concurrently in the blood and the repeated muscle biopsies. Alterations in the mRNA expression of inflammatory, stressor and degeneration-associated molecules were examined in the repeated biopsies. During a 12-month observation period, the patients' total strength had declined by a mean of 14.9% based on Quantitative Muscle Strength Testing. Six months after therapy, the overall decline was only 1.9% (P < 0.002), corresponding to a 13% differential gain. Among those patients, four improved by a mean of 10% and six reported improved performance of daily activities. The benefit was more evident by the Medical Research Council scales, which demonstrated a decline in the total scores by 13.8% during the observation period but an improvement by 11.4% (P < 0.001) after 6 months, reaching the level of strength recorded 12 months earlier. Depletion of peripheral blood lymphocytes, including the naive and memory CD8+ cells, was noted 2 weeks after treatment and persisted up to 6 months. The effector CD45RA(+)CD62L(-) cells, however, started to increase 2 months after therapy and peaked by the 4th month. Repeated muscle biopsies showed reduction of CD3 lymphocytes by a mean of 50% (P < 0.008), most prominent in the improved patients, and reduced mRNA expression of stressor molecules Fas, Mip-1a and alphaB-crystallin; the mRNA of desmin, a regeneration-associated molecule, increased. This proof-of-principle study provides insights into the pathogenesis of inclusion-body myositis and concludes that in sIBM one series of Alemtuzumab infusions can slow down disease progression up to 6 months, improve the strength of some patients, and reduce endomysial inflammation and stressor molecules. These encouraging results, the first in sIBM, warrant a future study with repeated infusions

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00079768.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in muscle strength using QMT. During a 12-month natural history period there is a decline in muscle strength based on QMT measurements by a mean of −14.9%. After 6 months of CAMPATH treatment the mean total muscle strength scores changed by a −1.9% from baseline (P = 0.002). At month 12 from CAMPATH initiation (6 months of follow-up without therapy), the patients’ strength had declined by a mean of −9.7% (P < 0.01) reaching almost the baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total muscle strength scores obtained with MRC measurements before and after CAMPATH. A mean of 13.8% decline was noted during a 24-month natural history period and 9.1% decline during a 12-month period. Six months after CAMPATH, the total strength improved be a mean of 11.4% (P = 0.0001) reaching almost the level of strength the patients had 2.5 years earlier.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in peripheral blood lymphocytes after CAMPATH. (A) A reduction of total peripheral blood lymphocytes immediately after CAMPATH was noted with a steady repopulation (occurring slowly up to 12 months) in all patients. (B) The kinetics of CD8 + T cells subsets after CAMPATH, including changes in the memory T cells, is shown for a representative patient. A depletion of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, compared to effector memory cells, was noted in nine patients (shown in Table 2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quantification of T cells in all biopsies showed a significant (P < 0.008) decline in the total number of CD8+ T cells (A). In contrast, during the natural history period prior to CAMPATH, the total lymphocyte count had remained unchanged or increased (B).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Representative muscle biopsy samples performed before and 6 months after treatment (stained with H&E) demonstrate reduction of lymphocytic infiltrates. With immunocytochemistry (B), a reduction of CD3- and CD8-positive lymphocytes was noted.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Quantitative mRNA expression of desmin (A) and aB crystalline (B) in the patients’ repeated muscle biopsies before and 6 months after CAMPATH. There is a significant increase of desmin and reduction of αB-crystallin. A significant decline of mRNA expression of Mip-1α (CCL-3) was also noted (not shown); at the protein level, CXCL9 was reduced in some patients, as observed in double immunohistochemical staining for CXCL-9 and CD8 (C). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

References

    1. Armstrong N, Buckley P, Oberley T, Fechner J, Jr, Dong Y, Hong X, et al. Analysis of primate renal allografts following T cell depletion with anti-CD3-CRM9. Transplantation. 1998;66:5–13.
    1. Askanas V, Engel WK. Inclusion-body myositis: a myodegenerative conformational disorder associated with Abeta, protein misfolding, and proteasome inhibition. Neurology. 2006;66(2 Suppl 1):S39–48.
    1. Badrising UA, Schreuder GM, Giphart MJ, Geleijns K, Verschuuren JJ, Wintzen AR, et al. Associations with autoimmune disorders and HLA class I and II antigens in inclusion body myositis. Neurology. 2004;63:2396–8.
    1. Banwell BL, Engel AG. AlphaB-crystallin immunolocalization yields new insights into inclusion body myositis. Neurology. 2000;54:1033–41.
    1. Chahin N, Engel AG. Correlation of muscle biopsy, clinical course, and outcome in PM and sporadic IBM. Neurology. 2008;70:418–24.
    1. Coles AJ, Lox A, Le Page, Jones J, Trip SA, Deans J, et al. The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence for monoclonal antibody therapy. J Neurol. 2006;253:98–108.
    1. Dalakas MC. Polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion-body myositis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1487–98.
    1. Dalakas MC. Inflammatory disorders of muscle: progress in polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004;17:561–7.
    1. Dalakas MC. Sporadic inclusion body myositis-diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:437–47.
    1. Dalakas MC, Sonies B, Dambrosia J, Sekul E, Cupler E, Sivakumar K. Treatment of inclusion body myositis with IVIg: a double-blind, placebo-control study. Neurology. 1997;48:712–6.
    1. Dalakas MC, Koffman B, Fujii M, Spector S, Sivakumar K, Cupler E. A controlled study of intravenous immunoglobulin combined with prednisone in the treatment of IBM. Neurology. 2001;56:323–7.
    1. Flynn JM, Byrd JC. Campath-1H monoclonal antibody therapy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000;12:574–81.
    1. Hale G, Waldmann H. From laboratory to clinic: the story of CAMPATH-1. Methods Mol Med. 2000;40:243–66.
    1. Hale G, Dyer MJS, Clark MR, Phillips JM, Marcus R, Riechmann L, et al. Remission induction in non-Hodgkin lymphoma with reshaped human monoclonal antibody CAMPATH-1H. Lancet. 1988;2:1394–9.
    1. Kirk AD, Hale DA, Mannon RB, Kleiner DE, Hoffmann SC, Kampen RL, et al. Results from a human renal allograft tolerance trial evaluating the humanized CD52-specific monoclonal antibody Campath-1H. Transplantation. 2003;76:120–9.
    1. Koffman BM, Rugiero M, Dalakas MC. Immune-mediated conditions and antibodies associated with sporadic inclusion body myositis. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:115–7.
    1. Lindberg C, Trysberg E, Tarkowski A, Oldfors A. Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin treatment in inclusion body myositis: a randomized pilot study. Neurology. 2003;61:260–2.
    1. Needham M, Mastaglia FL. Inclusion body myositis: current pathogenetic concepts and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 2007:620–31.
    1. Mikol J, Engel AG. Inclusion body myositis. In: Engel AG, Franzini-Armstrong C, editors. Myology. 3rd. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 2004. pp. 1367–88.
    1. Muntzing K, Lindberg C, Moslemi AR, Oldfors A. Inclusion body myositis: clonal expansions of muscle-infiltrating T cells persist over time. Scand J Immunol. 2003;58:195–200.
    1. Nagaraju K, Casciola-Rosen L, Lundberg I, Rawat R, Cutting S, Thapliyal R, et al. Activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in autoimmune myositis: potential role in muscle fiber damage and dysfunction. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1824–35.
    1. Pearl JP, Paris J, Hale DA, Hoffmann SC, Bernstein WB, McCoy , et al. Immunocometent T-cells with a memory-like phenotype are the dominant cell type following antibody-mediated T-cell depletion. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:465–74.
    1. Reiff A. A review of Campath in autoimmune disease: biologic therapy in the gray zone between immunosuppression and immunoablation. Hematology. 2005;10:79–93.
    1. Salajegheh M, Rakocevic G, Raju R, Shatunov A, Goldfarb LG, Dalakas MC. T cell receptor profiling in muscle and blood lymphocytes in sporadic inclusion body myositis. Neurology. 2007;69:1672–9.
    1. Schmidt J, Barthel K, Wrede A, Salajegheh M, Bähr M, Dalakas MC. Interrelation of inflammation and APP in sIBM: IL-1β induces accumulation of β-amyloid in skeletal muscle. Brain. 2008;131:1228–40.
    1. The CAMMS233. Trial investigation. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1786–801.
    1. Weinblatt ME, Maddison PJ, Bulpitt KJ, Hazleman BL, Urowitz MB, Sturrock RD, et al. CAMPATH-1H, a humanized monoclonal antibody, in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. An intravenous dose-escalation study. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1589–94.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever