PReventing Idiopathic SCOliosis PROgression (PRISCOPRO): A protocol for a quadruple-blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing 3D designed Boston brace to standard Boston brace

Elias Diarbakerli, Anastasios Charalampidis, Allan Abbott, Paul Gerdhem, Elias Diarbakerli, Anastasios Charalampidis, Allan Abbott, Paul Gerdhem

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity in children. Treatment strategies aim to halt progression of the curve. Patients are treated mainly with thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) if indicated. This form of brace treatment has been shown to be cumbersome and tough on growing individuals. However, computer aided design and manufactured (CAD/CAM) braces might increase comfortability and ultimately outcome if compliance is improved. In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we aim to compare CAD/CAM designed Boston 3D-brace to standard Boston brace.

Methods: Subjects: 170 previously untreated and skeletally immature children diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis, aged 9-17 years of age (curve magnitude Cobb 25-40 degrees) will be included. Interventions: Both groups will receive a physical activity prescription according to the World Health Organization recommendations. Randomization will be performed 1:1 to a 3D CAD/CAM designed Boston 3D-brace or a standard Boston brace, both with prescribed daily wear time of 20 hours. Outcome: The subjects will participate in the study until curve progression or until skeletal maturity. The primary outcome variable is failure of treatment, defined as progression of the Cobb angle more than 6 degrees compared to the baseline x-ray. The progression is confirmed if seen on two consecutive standing spinal x-rays. Radiographs will be taken at each six-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include patient and clinical reported outcomes, including number of individuals requiring surgical intervention.

Discussion: This study will show if efficacy in brace treatment can be improved with new brace designs.

Trial registration: The protocol has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04805437.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow scheme of patient recruitment…
Fig 1. Flow scheme of patient recruitment and management.
Fig 2. SPIRIT 2013 checklist: Recommended items…
Fig 2. SPIRIT 2013 checklist: Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents.

References

    1. Willner S., Uden A. A prospective prevalence study of scoliosis in Southern Sweden. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1982;53(2):233–7. doi: 10.3109/17453678208992208
    1. Weinstein S.L., Dolan L. A., Wright J. G., Dobbs M. B. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;369(16):1512–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337
    1. Danielsson A. J. , Wiklund I., Pehrsson K., Nachemson A. L. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European spine journal. 2001;10(4):278–88. doi: 10.1007/s005860100309
    1. Diarbakerli E., Grauers A., Danielsson A., Gerdhem P. Health-Related Quality of Life in Adulthood in Untreated and Treated Individuals with Adolescent or Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2018;100(10):811–7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00822
    1. Wang H., Tetteroo D., Arts J. J. C., Markopoulos P., Ito K. Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace treatment: a brief communication of literature review. Qual Life Res. 2021Mar;30(3):703–711. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02671-7
    1. Dolan L. A., Donzelli S., Zaina F., Weinstein S. L., Negrini S. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Bracing Success Is Influenced by Time in Brace: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of BrAIST and ISICO Cohorts. Spine. 2020;45(17):1193–9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003506
    1. Cobetto N., Aubin C. E., Clin J., Le May S., Desbiens-Blais F., Labelle H., et al.. Braces Optimized With Computer-Assisted Design and Simulations Are Lighter, More Comfortable, and More Efficient Than Plaster-Cast Braces for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine deformity. 2014;2(4):276–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.005
    1. Cottalorda J., Kohler R., Garin C., Genevois P., Lecante C., Berge B. Orthoses for mild scoliosis: a prospective study comparing traditional plaster mold manufacturing with fast, noncontact, 3-dimensional acquisition. Spine. 2005;30(4):399–405. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153346.40391.3b
    1. Cobetto N., Aubin C. E., Parent S., Barchi S., Turgeon I., Labelle H. 3D correction of AIS in braces designed using CAD/CAM and FEM: a randomized controlled trial. Scoliosis and spinal disorders. 2017;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0128-9
    1. Desbiens-Blais F., Clin J., Parent S, Labelle H., Aubin C. E. New brace design combining CAD/CAM and biomechanical simulation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27(10):999–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.006
    1. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1948;5:261–75.
    1. Sanders J. O., Khoury J. G., Kishan S., Browne R. H., Mooney J. F. 3rd, Arnold K. D., et al.. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2008;90(3):540–53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00004
    1. Risser J.C. The Iliac apophysis; an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clinical orthopaedics. 1958;11:111–9.
    1. Abbott A., Moller H., Gerdhem P. CONTRAIS: CONservative TReatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2013;14:261. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-261
    1. Bunnell W. P. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1984;66(9):1381–7.
    1. Hollis S., Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7211):670–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
    1. Hawary R. E., Zaaroor-Regev D., Floman Y., Lonner B. S., Alkhalife Y. I., Betz R. R. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure-a literature review. The spine journal. 2019;19(12):1917–25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.008
    1. Negrini S., Minozzi S., Bettany-Saltikov J., Chockalingam N., Grivas T. B., Kotwicki T., et al.. Braces for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents. Spine. 2016;41(23):1813–25. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001887

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever