Fractional photothermolysis--an update

Inja Bogdan Allemann, Joely Kaufman, Inja Bogdan Allemann, Joely Kaufman

Abstract

The novel concept of non-ablative fractional photothermolysis was introduced to the market in 2003 as an answer to the need for effective, yet low risk, resurfacing techniques. Unlike conventional ablative and non-ablative lasers, fractional ablative and non-ablative photothermolysis treats only a fraction of the skin, leaving up to a maximum of 95% of the skin uninvolved. The undamaged surrounding tissue allows for a reservoir of viable tissue, permitting rapid epidermal repair. Non-ablative fractional photothermolysis is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of pigmented lesions, periorbital rhytides, skin resurfacing, melasma and soft tissue coagulation, acne and surgical scars, and actinic keratoses. However, its off-label use is clearly more extended. In 2007 the concept was further developed, and ablative fractional photothermolysis was introduced, using an erbium yttrium aluminium garnet (Er: YAG) or carbon dioxide laser. These devices are FDA cleared to treat wrinkles, rhytides, furrows, fine lines, textural irregularities, pigmented lesions and vascular dyschromia. In this review we discuss the two concepts, their technical details and clinical indications, and we describe the current literature available.

References

    1. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):480-6
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Feb;40(2):113-23
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):87-95
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1112-4
    1. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006 Apr;8(1):35-8
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Mar;38(3):169-76
    1. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Mar;24(2):186-94
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Feb;40(2):134-8
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Aug;40(6):381-6
    1. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Dec;143(12):1488-90
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):301-5; discussion 305-7
    1. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Aug;7(8):774-7
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Apr;39(4):311-4
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1048-53
    1. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Nov;6(11):1151-2
    1. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008;19(1):45-9
    1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009 Apr;7(4):301-8
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):23-8
    1. Science. 1983 Apr 29;220(4596):524-7
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):298-301
    1. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1340-1
    1. J Dermatol. 2006 Sep;33(9):623-7
    1. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007 Dec;9(4):218-25
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Mar;41(3):185-8
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):73-8
    1. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007 Sep;9(3):161-3
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):289-94; discussion 293-4
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Feb;38(2):142-9
    1. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007 Jun;9(2):101-3
    1. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):39-43
    1. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Mar;8(3):294-7
    1. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(1):33-7
    1. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Aug;6(8):818-20
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jul;35(7):1089-98
    1. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Aug;6(8):849-52
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Apr;36(4):270-80
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9 Pt 2):1245-9; discussion 1249
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):222-8
    1. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):156-8
    1. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Mar;41(3):179-84
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1645-50
    1. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):295-9

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever