Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial

Cameron G McDougall, Orlando Diaz, Alan Boulos, Adnan H Siddiqui, Justin Caplan, Johanna T Fifi, Aquilla S Turk, Yasha Kayan, Pascal Jabbour, Louis J Kim, Steven W Hetts, Daniel L Cooke, Christopher F Dowd, Cameron G McDougall, Orlando Diaz, Alan Boulos, Adnan H Siddiqui, Justin Caplan, Johanna T Fifi, Aquilla S Turk, Yasha Kayan, Pascal Jabbour, Louis J Kim, Steven W Hetts, Daniel L Cooke, Christopher F Dowd

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) flow diverter in support of an application for Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA.

Methods: 145 patients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm multicenter trial. Patients with aneurysms of unfavorable morphology for traditional endovascular therapies (large, wide-necked, fusiform, etc) were included. The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority in both safety and effectiveness, comparing trial results with performance goals (PGs) established from peer-reviewed published literature. The primary safety endpoint was death or major stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 points) within 30 days of the procedure, or any major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death within the first year. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete occlusion of the target aneurysm with ≤50% stenosis of the parent artery at 12 months after treatment, and in which an alternative treatment of the target intracranial aneurysm had not been performed.

Results: 145 patients underwent attempted placement of a FRED device, and one or more devices were placed in all 145 patients. 135/145 (93%) had a single device placed. Core laboratory adjudication deemed 106 (73.1%) of the aneurysms large or giant. A safety endpoint was experienced by 9/145 (6.2%) patients, successfully achieving the safety PG of <15%. The effectiveness PG of >46% aneurysm occlusion was also achieved, with the effectiveness endpoint being met in 80/139 (57.6%) CONCLUSION: As compared with historically derived performance benchmarks, the FRED flow diverter is both safe and effective for the treatment of appropriately selected intracranial aneurysms.

Clinical registration number: NCT01801007.

Keywords: aneurysm; flow diverter; intervention; technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CGM: consultant to Microvention and Medtronic OOD: proctor for FRED/Microvention. AB: consultant to Microvention and Vesalio. AHS:SNIS Board of Directors; current research grants: co-investigator: NIH/NINDS 1R01NS091075 Virtual intervention of intracranial aneurysms; role: co-principal investigator NIH-NINDS R21 NS109575-01 Optimizing approaches to endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke; financial interest: Adona Medical, Inc., Amnis Therapeutics, Bend IT Technologies, Ltd., BlinkTBI, Inc, Boston Scientific Corp (for purchase of Claret Medical), Buffalo Technology Partners, Inc., Cardinal Consultants, LLC, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc, Cognition Medical, Endostream Medical, Ltd, Imperative Care, Inc., Instylla, Inc., International Medical Distribution Partners, IRRAS, LaunchNY Seed Fund Management, LLC, NeuroRadial Technologies, Inc., Neurovascular Diagnostics, Inc., Perflow Medical, Ltd., Q’Apel Medical, Inc., Radical Catheter Technologies, Inc., Rebound Therapeutics Corp. (purchased 2019 by Integra Lifesciences, Corp), Rist Neurovascular, Inc., Sense Diagnostics, Inc., Serenity Medical, Inc., Silk Road Medical, Spinnaker Medical, Inc., StimMed, Synchron, Three Rivers Medical, Inc., Truvic Medical, Inc, Vastrax, LLC, VICIS, Inc., Viseon, Inc., Viz.ai, Inc; consultant/advisory board: Amnis Therapeutics, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc., Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Cerenovus, Corindus, Inc., Endostream Medical, Ltd, Imperative Care, Inc., Integra LifeSciences Corp., IRRAS, Medtronic, MicroVention, Minnetronix Neuro, Inc., Northwest University – Data Safety Monitoring Board chair for HEAT Trial, Penumbra, Perflow Medical, Ltd., Q’Apel Medical, Inc., Rapid Medical, Rebound Therapeutics Corp., Serenity Medical, Inc., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Stryker, Three Rivers Medical, Inc., VasSol, Viz.ai, Inc., W.L. Gore & Associates; national PI/steering committees: Cerenovus NAPA Trial and ARISE II Trial; Medtronic SWIFT PRIME and SWIFT DIRECT Trials; MicroVention FRED Trial and CONFIDENCE Study; MUSC POSITIVE Trial; Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial;· No consulting salary arrangements. All consulting is per project and/or per hour. JC: No disclosures. JTF: SNIS Board of Directors; consultant to Microvention and Stryker. AST: consultant to Microvention, Medtronic, Viz AI, Siemens;.chief medical officer Imperative Care. YK: consultant to Microvention, Penumbra, Medtronic. PJ: consultant to Microvention

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient accountability. FRED, Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device; ITT, intention-to-treat; mITT, modified intention-to-treat.

References

    1. Kocer N, Islak C, Kizilkilic O, et al. . Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1158–71. 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442
    1. Ding YH, Tieu T, Kallmes DF. Experimental testing of a new generation of flow diverters in sidewall aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:732–6. 10.3174/ajnr.A4167
    1. Möhlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Jestaedt L, et al. . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61. 10.3174/ajnr.A4251
    1. Raymond J, Guilbert François, Weill A, et al. . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403. 10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. . Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993–1003. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335
    1. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68. 10.1148/radiol.13120099
    1. Meyers PM, Coon AL, Kan PT, et al. . SCENT trial. Stroke 2019;50:1473–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024135
    1. Awad AW, Kilburg C, Karsy M, et al. . Change in the angle of the anterior genu is associated with occlusion rate after Pipeline flow diversion. J Neurosurg 2019:1–5.
    1. Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Kocer N, Griessenauer CJ, et al. . European multicenter study for the evaluation of a dual-layer flow-diverting stent for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: the European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device study. Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:841–7. 10.3174/ajnr.A5592
    1. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, et al. . Safe study (safety and efficacy analysis of FRED embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:184–9. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014261
    1. Piano M, Valvassori L, Lozupone E, et al. . FRED Italian registry: a multicenter experience with the flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2019:174–81. 10.3171/2019.1.JNS183005
    1. Guimaraens L, Vivas E, Saldaña J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of the dual-layer flow-diverting stent (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:521–5. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015371
    1. Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, et al. . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2017;127:81–8. 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311
    1. Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, et al. . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–8. 10.1093/neuros/nyw014
    1. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015;36:108–15. 10.3174/ajnr.A4111
    1. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg 2017;127:1–6. 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467
    1. Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, et al. . Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:62–6. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever