A comparison of two mail-based strategies to recruit older cancer survivors into a randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle intervention

Amelia C Warnock, Harleen Kaur, J Ryan Buckman, Teri Hoenemeyer, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Amelia C Warnock, Harleen Kaur, J Ryan Buckman, Teri Hoenemeyer, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried

Abstract

Purpose: To compare response rates to business letter versus greeting card invitations used to recruit older cancer survivors to a randomized controlled clinical trial of a lifestyle intervention METHODS: Capitalizing upon recruitment efforts for a lifestyle intervention trial among older cancer survivors, we explored response rates to study invitations formatted as greeting cards versus standard business letters. Survivors were identified from cancer registries and medical records and randomly assigned with strata defined by gender and racial/ethnicity to one-of-the-two invitations. Both groups received telephone follow-up.

Results: Contact was verified among 708 survivors with an average age of 72 years with most being non-Hispanic White (NHW), urban dwelling, and female. Survivors assigned to the business letter (n = 360) as compared to the greeting card (n = 348) were significantly more likely to express interest in participation (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.70). With the exception of racial/ethnic minorities (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.26-2.11), all other subgroups favored the business letter with significance observed in females (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.00-2.74), NHWs (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.29-3.49), and rural dwellers (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.49-8.76). Moreover, the business letter costs were substantially lower than the card.

Conclusion: Clinical trial recruitment is significantly more effective if solicitations are formatted as standard business letters as compared to greeting cards, though this may not generalize to racial/ethnic minorities where more research is warranted.

Implications for cancer survivors: These study findings are not only valuable to researchers but also have the potential to improve recruitment and engagement of older cancer survivors in clinical trials.

Clinical trial registration: Harvest for Health for in Older Cancer Survivors, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985411.

Keywords: Cancer survivors; Clinical trials; Enrollment; Lifestyle; Recruitment.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustrations of the standard business invitation (a) and the greeting card invitation (b)

References

    1. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al. What influences recruitment to randomized controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9.
    1. Desai M. Recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies: critical issues and challenges. Perspect Clin Res. 2020 doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_6_20.
    1. Williams RJ, Tse T, DiPiazza K, Zarin DA. Terminated trials in the Results database: evaluation of availability of primary outcome data and reasons for termination. PLoS One. 2015. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127242.
    1. Tufts University Center for the Study of Drug Development. 89% of trials meet enrollment, but timelines slip, half of sites under-enroll. Impact Report 2013;15(1). . Accessed online 03.01.2021
    1. Sidney S, Go AS, Jaffe MG, Solomon MD, Ambrosy AP, Rana JS. Association between aging of the US population and heart disease mortality From 2011 to 2017. JAMA Cardiol. 2019.10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4187
    1. Gismondi PM, Hamer DH, Leka LS, Dallal G, Fiatarone Singh MA, et al. Strategies, time, and costs associated with the recruitment and enrollment of nursing home residents for a micronutrient supplementation clinical trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1469.
    1. Chin Feman SP, Nguyen LT, Quilty MT, Kerr CE, Nam BH, Conboy LA, et al. Effectiveness of recruitment in clinical trials: an analysis of methods used in a trial for irritable bowel syndrome patients. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.08.004.
    1. Kakumanu S, Manns BJ, Tran S, Saunders-Smith T, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M, et al. Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis. Trials. 2019 doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3652-5.
    1. Jurascheck SP, Plante TB, Charleston J, Miller ER, Yeh H, Appel LJ, et al. Use of online recruitment strategies in a randomized trial of cancer survivors. Clinical Trials (London, England). 2018. 10.1177/1740774517745829.
    1. Patterson RE, Marinac CR, Natarajan L, Hartman SJ, Cadmus-Bertram L, Flatt SW, et al. Recruitment strategies, design, and participant characteristics in a trial of weight-loss and metformin in breast cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.009.
    1. Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. 1997 doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00236-x.
    1. Tworoger SS, Yasui Y, Ulrich CM, Nakamura K, LaCroix K, Johnston R, et al. Mailing strategies and recruitment into an intervention trial of the exercise effect on breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:73–77.
    1. Kiernan M, Phillips K, Fair JM, King AC. Using direct mail to recruit Hispanic adults into a dietary intervention: an experimental study 1, 2, 3. Ann Behav Med. 2000 doi: 10.1007/BF02895172.
    1. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.
    1. Bail JR, Frugé AD, Cases MG, De Los Santos JF, Locher JL, Smith KP, et al. A home-based mentored vegetable gardening intervention demonstrates feasibility and improvements in physical activity and performance among breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2018 doi: 10.1002/cncr.31559.
    1. Marsh AP, Lovato LC, Glynn NW, Kennedy K, Castro C, Domanchuk K, PA. Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Study: recruitment and baseline characteristics. J Gerontol. 2013. 10.1093/gerona/glt064.
    1. Estabrooks P, You W, Hedrick V, Reinholt M, Dohm E, Zoellner J. A pragmatic examination of active and passive recruitment methods to improve the reach of community lifestyle programs: the Talking Health Trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2017 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0462-6.
    1. Alabama Rural Health Association. “Definition of rural Alabama.” Alabama Rural Health Association. 2018. Accessed online 03.01.2021.
    1. Guillemin M, Barnard E, Allen A, Stewart P, Walker H, Rosenthal D, et al. Do research participants trust researchers or their institution? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 doi: 10.1177/1556264618763253.
    1. Hoedjes M, van Stralen MM, Joe STA, Rookus M, van Leeuwen F, Michie S, Seidell JC, Kampman E. Toward the optimal strategy for sustained weight loss in overweight cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0594-8.
    1. Smirnoff M, Wilets I, Ragin DF, Adams R, Holohan J, Rhodes R, et al. A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: the Community VOICES study. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1432718.
    1. Brown, SD, Lee, K., Schoffman, BA, King, ACl, Crawley, LM, Kierman, M. Minority recruitment into clinical trials: experimental findings and practical implications. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.003.
    1. Kiernan M, Edwards K, Fair JM, King AC. Using direct mail to recruit Hispanic adults into a dietary intervention: An experimental study. Ann Behav Med. 2000 doi: 10.1007/BF02895172.
    1. Caldwell PH, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368.
    1. Snyder DC, Morey MC, Sloane R, Stull V, Cohen HJ, Peterson B, et al. Reach out to ENhancE Wellness in Older Cancer Survivors (RENEW): design, methods and recruitment challenges of a home-based exercise and diet intervention to improve physical function among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Psychooncol. 2009 doi: 10.1002/pon.1491.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever