High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial

Martin J Boeree, Norbert Heinrich, Rob Aarnoutse, Andreas H Diacon, Rodney Dawson, Sunita Rehal, Gibson S Kibiki, Gavin Churchyard, Ian Sanne, Nyanda E Ntinginya, Lilian T Minja, Robert D Hunt, Salome Charalambous, Madeleine Hanekom, Hadija H Semvua, Stellah G Mpagama, Christina Manyama, Bariki Mtafya, Klaus Reither, Robert S Wallis, Amour Venter, Kim Narunsky, Anka Mekota, Sonja Henne, Angela Colbers, Georgette Plemper van Balen, Stephen H Gillespie, Patrick P J Phillips, Michael Hoelscher, PanACEA consortium, Martin J Boeree, Norbert Heinrich, Rob Aarnoutse, Andreas H Diacon, Rodney Dawson, Sunita Rehal, Gibson S Kibiki, Gavin Churchyard, Ian Sanne, Nyanda E Ntinginya, Lilian T Minja, Robert D Hunt, Salome Charalambous, Madeleine Hanekom, Hadija H Semvua, Stellah G Mpagama, Christina Manyama, Bariki Mtafya, Klaus Reither, Robert S Wallis, Amour Venter, Kim Narunsky, Anka Mekota, Sonja Henne, Angela Colbers, Georgette Plemper van Balen, Stephen H Gillespie, Patrick P J Phillips, Michael Hoelscher, PanACEA consortium

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis is the world's leading infectious disease killer. We aimed to identify shorter, safer drug regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis.

Methods: We did a randomised controlled, open-label trial with a multi-arm, multi-stage design. The trial was done in seven sites in South Africa and Tanzania, including hospitals, health centres, and clinical trial centres. Patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-sensitive, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive (all orally) either 35 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 400 mg moxifloxacin, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, or a daily standard control regimen (10 mg/kg rifampicin, 5 mg/kg isoniazid, 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide, and 15-20 mg/kg ethambutol). Experimental treatments were given with oral 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide per day for 12 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day. Because of the orange discoloration of body fluids with higher doses of rifampicin it was not possible to mask patients and clinicians to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to culture conversion in liquid media within 12 weeks. Patients without evidence of rifampicin resistance on phenotypic test who took at least one dose of study treatment and had one positive culture on liquid or solid media before or within the first 2 weeks of treatment were included in the primary analysis (modified intention to treat). Time-to-event data were analysed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model and adjusted for minimisation variables. The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoelfeld residuals, with threshold p<0·05 for non-proportionality. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01785186).

Findings: Between May 7, 2013, and March 25, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 365 patients to different treatment arms (63 to rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; 59 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109; 57 to rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and SQ109; 63 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; and 123 to the control arm). Recruitment was stopped early in the arms containing SQ109 since prespecified efficacy thresholds were not met at the planned interim analysis. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin group than in the control group (median 48 days vs 62 days, adjusted hazard ratio 1·78; 95% CI 1·22-2·58, p=0·003), but not in other experimental arms. There was no difference in any of the groups in time to culture conversion on solid media. 11 patients had treatment failure or recurrent disease during post-treatment follow-up: one in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin arm and none in the moxifloxacin arm. 45 (12%) of 365 patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events, with similar proportions in each arm.

Interpretation: A dose of 35 mg/kg rifampicin was safe, reduced the time to culture conversion in liquid media, and could be a promising component of future, shorter regimens. Our adaptive trial design was successfully implemented in a multi-centre, high tuberculosis burden setting, and could speed regimen development at reduced cost.

Funding: The study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP), the German Ministry for Education and Research (BmBF), and the Medical Research Council UK (MRC).

Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Recruitment to RIFQHZ arm and RIF20QHZ arm was stopped early following the first interim analysed. Three patients who were randomised in error were not started on treatment and not retained in follow-up. RIF35HZE=rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol. RIFQHZ=rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109 300 mg. RIF20QHZ=rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109 300 mg. RIF20MHZ=rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin 400 mg. ITT=intention-to-treat. MDR TB=multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Doses of concomitant drugs are detailed in Procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curve for time to culture conversion (A) Time to culture conversion in liquid MGIT media. (B) Time to culture conversion on solid Löwenstein-Jensen media. MGIT=mycobacteria growth indicator tube. RIF35HZE=rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol. RIFQHZ=rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109 300 mg. RIF20QHZ=rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109 300 mg. RIF20MHZ=rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin 400 mg. Doses of concomitant drugs are detailed in Procedures. Dashed vertical line refers to the week 8 time-point (cutoff in post-hoc analysis). Solid vertical line refers to the week 12 time-point (cutoff in primary analysis).

References

    1. Fox W, Ellard GA, Mitchison DA. Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3:S231–S279.
    1. van Ingen J, Aarnoutse RE, Donald PR. Why do we use 600 mg of rifampicin in tuberculosis treatment? Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e194–e199.
    1. de Steenwinkel JE, Aarnoutse RE, de Knegt GJ. Optimization of the rifampin dosage to improve the therapeutic efficacy in tuberculosis treatment using a murine model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:1127–1134.
    1. Hu Y, Liu A, Ortega-Muro F, Alameda-Martin L, Mitchison D, Coates A. High-dose rifampicin kills persisters, shortens treatment duration, and reduces relapse rate in vitro and in vivo. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:641.
    1. Rosenthal IM, Tasneen R, Peloquin CA. Dose-ranging comparison of rifampin and rifapentine in two pathologically distinct murine models of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4331–4340.
    1. Jayaram R, Gaonkar S, Kaur P. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of rifampin in an aerosol infection model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2118–2124.
    1. Steingart KR, Jotblad S, Robsky K. Higher-dose rifampin for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:305–316.
    1. Boeree MJ, Diacon AH, Dawson R. A dose-ranging trial to optimize the dose of rifampin in the treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1058–1065.
    1. Boeree MJ. High-dose rifampicin: issues in efficacy and safety. The 46th Union World Conference on Lung Health; Cape Town; Dec 6, 2015.
    1. Phillips PP, Gillespie SH, Boeree M. Innovative trial designs are practical solutions for improving the treatment of tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(suppl 2):S250–S257.
    1. James ND, Sydes MR, Mason MD. Celecoxib plus hormone therapy versus hormone therapy alone for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: first results from the STAMPEDE multiarm, multistage, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:549–558.
    1. Sacksteder KA, Protopopova M, Barry CE, 3rd, Andries K, Nacy CA. Discovery and development of SQ109: a new antitubercular drug with a novel mechanism of action. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:823–837.
    1. Heinrich N, Dawson R, du Bois J. Early phase evaluation of SQ109 alone and in combination with rifampicin in pulmonary TB patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1558–1566.
    1. Rustomjee R, Lienhardt C, Kanyok T. A phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:128–138.
    1. Gillespie SH, Crook AM, McHugh TD. Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1577–1587.
    1. Conde MB, Efron A, Loredo C. Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the initial treatment of tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase II trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1183–1189.
    1. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. EMEA; London: 2002.
    1. Program NTC DoH . The South African national tuberculosis control programme practical guidelines. Department of Health; Pretoria: 2004.
    1. FDA . E14 clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Rockville, MD: 2005.
    1. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD: 2010.
    1. Dawson R, Diacon AH, Everitt D. Efficiency and safety of the combination of moxifloxacin, pretomanid (PA-824), and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of antituberculosis treatment: a phase 2b, open-label, partly randomised trial in patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet. 2015;385:1738–1747.
    1. Dorman SE, Savic RM, Goldberg S. Daily rifapentine for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A randomized, dose-ranging trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:333–343.
    1. Nijland HM, Ruslami R, Suroto AJ. Rifampicin reduces plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin in patients with tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1001–1007.
    1. Musuka S, Srivastava S, Siyambalapitiyage Dona CW. Thioridazine exhibits wobbly pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters during treatment of tuberculosis: a theoretical basis for shorter duration curative monotherapy with congeners. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5870–5877.
    1. Sloan DJ, Mwandumba HC, Garton NJ, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of bacillary elimination rates and detection of bacterial lipid bodies in sputum to predict and understand outcomes in treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis; 61: 1–8.
    1. Prideaux B, Via LE, Zimmerman MD. The association between sterilizing activity and drug distribution into tuberculosis lesions. Nat Med. 2015;21:1223–1227.
    1. Bowness R, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse R. The relationship between Mycobacterium tuberculosis MGIT time to positivity and cfu in sputum samples demonstrates changing bacterial phenotypes potentially reflecting the impact of chemotherapy on critical sub-populations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:448–455.
    1. Kayigire XA, Friedrich SO, van der Merwe L, Donald PR, Diacon AH. Simultaneous staining of sputum smears for acid-fast and lipid-containing Myobacterium tuberculosis can enhance the clinical evaluation of antituberculosis treatments. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015;95:770–779.
    1. Dhillon J, Fourie PB, Mitchison DA. Persister populations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum that grow in liquid but not on solid culture media. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:437–440.
    1. Acocella G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of rifampicin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978;3:108–127.
    1. Gumbo T, Louie A, Deziel MR. Concentration-dependent Mycobacterium tuberculosis killing and prevention of resistance by rifampin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3781–3788.
    1. Heemskerk AD, Bang ND, Mai NT. Intensified antituberculosis therapy in adults with tuberculous meningitis. N Eng J Med. 2016;374:124–134.
    1. Chigutsa E, Visser ME, Swart EC. The SLCO1B1 rs4149032 polymorphism is highly prevalent in South Africans and is associated with reduced rifampin concentrations: dosing implications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:4122–4127.
    1. Phillips PP, Dooley KE, Gillespie SH. A new trial design to accelerate tuberculosis drug development: the phase IIC selection trial with extended post-treatment follow-up (STEP) BMC Med. 2016;14:51.
    1. Honeyborne I, Mtafya B, Phillips PP. The molecular bacterial load assay replaces solid culture for measuring early bactericidal response to antituberculosis treatment. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:3064–3067.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever