Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial
Masatoshi Kudo, Richard S Finn, Shukui Qin, Kwang-Hyub Han, Kenji Ikeda, Fabio Piscaglia, Ari Baron, Joong-Won Park, Guohong Han, Jacek Jassem, Jean Frederic Blanc, Arndt Vogel, Dmitry Komov, T R Jeffry Evans, Carlos Lopez, Corina Dutcus, Matthew Guo, Kenichi Saito, Silvija Kraljevic, Toshiyuki Tamai, Min Ren, Ann-Lii Cheng, Masatoshi Kudo, Richard S Finn, Shukui Qin, Kwang-Hyub Han, Kenji Ikeda, Fabio Piscaglia, Ari Baron, Joong-Won Park, Guohong Han, Jacek Jassem, Jean Frederic Blanc, Arndt Vogel, Dmitry Komov, T R Jeffry Evans, Carlos Lopez, Corina Dutcus, Matthew Guo, Kenichi Saito, Silvija Kraljevic, Toshiyuki Tamai, Min Ren, Ann-Lii Cheng
Abstract
Background: In a phase 2 trial, lenvatinib, an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients treated with lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods: This was an open-label, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial that recruited patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, who had not received treatment for advanced disease, at 154 sites in 20 countries throughout the Asia-Pacific, European, and North American regions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system-with region; macroscopic portal vein invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; and bodyweight as stratification factors-to receive oral lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg) or sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause. The efficacy analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, and only patients who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. The non-inferiority margin was set at 1·08. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01761266.
Findings: Between March 1, 2013 and July 30, 2015, 1492 patients were recruited. 954 eligible patients were randomly assigned to lenvatinib (n=478) or sorafenib (n=476). Median survival time for lenvatinib of 13·6 months (95% CI 12·1-14·9) was non-inferior to sorafenib (12·3 months, 10·4-13·9; hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·06), meeting criteria for non-inferiority. The most common any-grade adverse events were hypertension (201 [42%]), diarrhoea (184 [39%]), decreased appetite (162 [34%]), and decreased weight (147 [31%]) for lenvatinib, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (249 [52%]), diarrhoea (220 [46%]), hypertension (144 [30%]), and decreased appetite (127 [27%]) for sorafenib.
Interpretation: Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The safety and tolerability profiles of lenvatinib were consistent with those previously observed.
Funding: Eisai Inc.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed