Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationship of Teprotumumab, an Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor-Blocking Antibody, in Thyroid Eye Disease
Yan Xin, Fengyan Xu, Yuying Gao, Nivedita Bhatt, Jason Chamberlain, Saba Sile, Suzy Hammel, Robert J Holt, Srini Ramanathan, Yan Xin, Fengyan Xu, Yuying Gao, Nivedita Bhatt, Jason Chamberlain, Saba Sile, Suzy Hammel, Robert J Holt, Srini Ramanathan
Abstract
Background and objective: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is characterized by inflammation/expansion of orbital tissues, proptosis, and diplopia. Teprotumumab is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for TED, administered as an initial intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg followed by 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks for an additional seven infusions. The objective of this article is to discuss the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response profile for teprotumumab in patients with TED.
Methods: A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to characterize pharmacokinetics and select dosing in patients with TED. Exposure-response was evaluated for efficacy (proptosis response, clinical activity score categorical response, and diplopia response) and safety (hyperglycemia, muscle spasms, and hearing impairment) parameters.
Results: Teprotumumab pharmacokinetics was linear in patients with TED, with low systemic clearance (0.334 L/day), low volume of distribution (3.9 and 4.2 L for the central and peripheral compartment, respectively), and a long elimination half-life (19.9 days). The approved dosing regimen provided > 20 µg/mL for > 90% insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor saturation throughout the dosing interval. Model-predicted mean (± standard deviation) steady-state area under the concentration-time curve, peak, and trough concentrations in patients with TED were 131 (± 30.9) mg∙h/mL, 643 (± 130) µg/mL, and 157 (± 50.6) µg/mL, respectively. Female patients had a 15% higher steady-state peak concentration but a similar steady-state area under the concentration-time curve vs male patients. No other covariates affected teprotumumab pharmacokinetics. No meaningful correlations between teprotumumab exposures and efficacy or safety parameters were observed.
Conclusions: Teprotumumab pharmacokinetics was well characterized in patients with TED, and generally consistent with other IgG1 antibodies. Efficacy was consistent across the exposure range with a well-tolerated safety profile supporting the current dose regimen for patients with TED.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00400361 NCT01868997 NCT03461211.
Conflict of interest statement
Yuying Gao and Fengyan Xu received consulting fees from Horizon Therapeutics; Yan Xin, Nivedita Bhatt, Jason Chamberlain, Saba Sile, Suzy Hammel, Robert J. Holt, Thompson, and Srini Ramanathan are employed by and own stocks in Horizon Therapeutics.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Smith TJ, Hegedus L. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1552–1565. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510030.
- Pritchard J, Han R, Horst N, Cruikshank WW, Smith TJ. Immunoglobulin activation of T cell chemoattractant expression in fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ disease is mediated through the insulin-like growth factor I receptor pathway. J Immunol. 2003;170(12):6348–6354. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.12.6348.
- Douglas RS, Naik V, Hwang CJ, Afifiyan NF, Gianoukakis AG, Sand D, et al. B cells from patients with Graves’ disease aberrantly express the IGF-1 receptor: implications for disease pathogenesis. J Immunol. 2008;181(8):5768–5774. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5768.
- Douglas RS, Gianoukakis AG, Kamat S, Smith TJ. Aberrant expression of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor by T cells from patients with Graves’ disease may carry functional consequences for disease pathogenesis. J Immunol. 2007;178(5):3281–3287. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3281.
- Tsui S, Naik V, Hoa N, Hwang CJ, Afifiyan NF, Sinha Hikim A, et al. Evidence for an association between thyroid-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors: a tale of two antigens implicated in Graves’ disease. J Immunol. 2008;181(6):4397–4405. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.4397.
- Smith TJ, Janssen J. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(1):236–267. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00066.
- Smith TJ. Novel aspects of orbital fibroblast pathology. J Endocrinol Invest. 2004;27(3):246–253. doi: 10.1007/BF03345273.
- Krieger CC, Boutin A, Jang D, Morgan SJ, Banga JP, Kahaly GJ, et al. Arrestin-beta-1 physically scaffolds TSH and IGF1 receptors to enable crosstalk. Endocrinology. 2019;160(6):1468–1479. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00055.
- Smith TJ, Kahaly GJ, Ezra DG, Fleming JC, Dailey RA, Tang RA, et al. Teprotumumab for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1748–1761. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614949.
- Douglas RS, Kahaly GJ, Patel A, Sile S, Thompson EHZ, Perdok R, et al. Teprotumumab for the treatment of active thyroid eye disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(4):341–352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910434.
- Tepezza [prescribing information]. 2020. . Accessed 20 Feb 2021.
- Kurzrock R, Patnaik A, Aisner J, Warren T, Leong S, Benjamin R, et al. A phase I study of weekly R1507, a human monoclonal antibody insulin-like growth factor-I receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(8):2458–2465. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3220.
- Rodon JPA, Stein M, Tolcher A, Ng C, Dias M, Kurman C, et al. A phase I study of q3W R1507, a human monoclonal antibody IGF-1R antagonist in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18 Suppl. 3590).
- Yang BB, Lum P, Chen A, Arends R, Roskos L, Smith B, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives on the clinical drug development of panitumumab. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(11):729–740. doi: 10.2165/11535970-000000000-00000.
- Beal SL, Boeckmann AJ, Sheiner LB. NONMEM user’s guide, Part I-VII. San Francisco (CA): University of California at San Francisco; 1988. 1992.
- Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41. doi: 10.1159/000180580.
- Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13(2):143–151. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z.
- Harling K, Uekcert S, Hooker A. NPC/VPC userguide and technical description. PsN 3.4.2. . Accessed 2013.
- Ette EI. Stability and performance of a population pharmacokinetic model. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;37(6):486–495. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04326.x.
- Bootstrap user guide. 2011.
- Deng R, Jin F, Prabhu S, Iyer S. Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for drug development? Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012;8(2):141–160. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2012.643868.
- Ryman JT, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(9):576–588. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12224.
- Dirks NL, Meibohm B. Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(10):633–659. doi: 10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000.
- Mager DE. Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.12.041.
- Perros P, Neoh C, Dickinson J. Thyroid eye disease. BMJ. 2009;338:b560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b560.
- Kahaly GJST, Smith TJ, Holt RJ, Sile S, Douglas RS. Effect of teprotumumab on proptosis reduction across various demographic sub-groups (abstract) J Endo Soc. 2020;4(Suppl. 1):A559–A560.
- Scientific T. Protein storage and stability (tech tip #43).
- Zhou H, Mascelli MA. Mechanisms of monoclonal antibody-drug interactions. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;51:359–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100510.
Source: PubMed