Altered neural activation in ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency during executive cognition: an fMRI study

Andrea L Gropman, Kyle Shattuck, Morgan J Prust, Rebecca R Seltzer, Andrew L Breeden, Ayichew Hailu, Amanda Rigas, Rehan Hussain, John VanMeter, Andrea L Gropman, Kyle Shattuck, Morgan J Prust, Rebecca R Seltzer, Andrew L Breeden, Ayichew Hailu, Amanda Rigas, Rehan Hussain, John VanMeter

Abstract

Background: Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD) is an X-linked urea cycle disorder characterized by hyperammonemia resulting in white matter injury and impairments in working memory and executive cognition.

Objective: To test for differences in BOLD signal activation between subjects with OTCD and healthy controls during a working memory task.

Design, setting and patients: Nineteen subjects with OTCD and 21 healthy controls participated in a case-control, IRB-approved study at Georgetown University Medical Center.

Intervention: An N-back working memory task was performed in a block design using 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: In subjects with OTCD we observed increased BOLD signal in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) relative to healthy age matched controls.

Conclusions: Increased neuronal activation in OTCD subjects despite equivalent task performance points to sub-optimal activation of the working memory network in these subjects, most likely reflecting damage caused by hyperammonemic events. These increases directly relate to our previous finding of reduced frontal white matter integrity in the superior extents of the corpus callosum; key hemispheric connections for these areas. Future studies using higher cognitive load are required to further characterize these effects.

Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Task‐dependent BOLD activation in OTCD patients and healthy controls. Statistical parametric maps of one‐way within‐group t‐tests for the Control group (red) and OTCD group (green) for 2‐back greater than 1‐back task‐related BOLD signal change (FWE P < 0.01). Bottom two rows, left to right, show coronal slice at y = 7, axial slices at z = 7, and z = −10. The position of right and left hemispheres are as they appear.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BOLD signal differences between OTCD patients and healthy controls. Statistical parametric maps of between‐group t‐tests, showing activation from the OTCD > control subject contrast. For each subject, the 2‐back > 1‐back contrast was used as the input image for group analysis (displayed at P < 0.005, uncorrected). Bars represent mean BOLD signal change, and error bars represent ± 1 standard error of the mean. Scale bar represents the BOLD signal t‐value.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever