National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study

Paraskevas Vezyridis, Stephen Timmons, Paraskevas Vezyridis, Stephen Timmons

Abstract

Background: In the attempt to reduce waiting times in emergency departments, various national health services have used benchmarking and the optimisation of patient flows. The aim of this study was to examine staff attitudes and experience of providing emergency care following the introduction of a 4 hour wait target, focusing on clinical, organisational and spatial issues.

Methods: A qualitative research design was used and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 clinical, managerial and administrative staff members working in an inner-city emergency department. A thematic analysis method was employed and NVivo 8 qualitative data analysis software was used to code and manage the emerging themes.

Results: The wait target came to regulate the individual and collective timescales of healthcare work. It has compartmentalised the previous unitary network of emergency department clinicians and their workspace. It has also speeded up clinical performance and patient throughput. It has disturbed professional hierarchies and facilitated the development of new professional roles. A new clinical information system complemented these reconfigurations by supporting advanced patient tracking, better awareness of time, and continuous, real-time management of emergency department staff. The interviewees had concerns that this target-oriented way of working forces them to have a less personal relationship with their patients.

Conclusions: The imposition of a wait-target in response to a perceived "crisis" of patients' dissatisfaction led to the development of a new and sophisticated way of working in the emergency department, but with deep and unintended consequences. We show that there is a dynamic interrelation of the social and the technical in the complex environment of the ED. While the 4 hour wait target raised the profile of the emergency department in the hospital, the added pressure on clinicians has caused some concerns over the future of their relationships with their patients and colleagues. To improve the sustainability of such sudden changes in policy direction, it is important to address clinicians' experience and satisfaction.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Old layout of ED.
Figure 2
Figure 2
New layout of ED.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Part of EDIS’ main clinical screen.

References

    1. Hunt MT, Glucksmann ME. A review of 7 years of complaints in an inner-city accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1991;8:17–23. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.1.17.
    1. Booth AJ, Harrison CJ, Gardener GJ, Gray AJ. Waiting times and patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1992;9:162–168. doi: 10.1136/emj.9.2.162.
    1. Trout A, Magnusson AR, Hedges JR. Patient satisfaction and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:695–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02050.x.
    1. Parker BT, Marco C. Emergency Department Length of Stay: accuracy of Patient Estimates. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:170–175. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.9.15816.
    1. Pines JM, Iyer S, Disbot M, Hollander JE, Shofer FS, Datner EM. The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:825–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00200.x.
    1. Wardrope J, McCormick S. Team structure, waiting time and a psychotic patient is banging on your door. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:382–385. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.382.
    1. Fernandes CM, Price A, Christenson JM. Does reduced length of stay decrease the number of emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician? J Emerg Med. 1997;15:397–399. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00030-9.
    1. Hobbs D, Kunzman SC, Tandberg D, Sklar D. Hospital factors associated with emergency center patients leaving without being seen. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:767–772. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2000.18075.
    1. Arendt HW, Sadosty AT, Weaver AL, Brent CR, Boie ET. The left without being seen patients: what would keep them from leaving? Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:317–323. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00404-9.
    1. McCarthy ML. Overcrowding in emergency departments and adverse outcomes. Br Med J. 2011;342:d2830. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2830.
    1. Kennedy J, Rhodes K, Walls CA, Asplin BR. Access to emergency care: restricted by long waiting times and cost and coverage concerns. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:567–573. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.012.
    1. Sprivulis PC, Da Silva J-A, Jacobs IG, Frazer ARL, Jelinek GA. The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust. 2006;184:208–212.
    1. Appleby J, Boyle S, Devlin N, Harley M, Harrison A, Thorlby R. Do English NHS waiting time targets distort treatment priorities in orthopaedic surgery? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:167–172. doi: 10.1258/1355819054339022.
    1. British Medical Association. BMA survey of A&E waiting times. London: BMA; 2005.
    1. Bevan G, Hood C. Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? Br Med J. 2006;332:419e22.
    1. Lilford RJ, Brown CA, Nicholl J. Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. Br Med J. 2007;335:648–650. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Kelman S, Friedman JN. Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2009;19:917–946. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun028.
    1. Bevan G. Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS? Br Med J. 2009;338:a3129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3129.
    1. Gubb J. Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS? Br Med J. 2009;338:a3130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3130.
    1. Weber EJ, Mason S, Freeman JV, Coster J. Implications of England's Four-Hour Target for Quality of Care and Resource Use in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.009.
    1. Jones P, Schimanski K. The four hour target to reduce emergency department ‘waiting time’: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Emerg Med Australas. 2010;22:391–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01330.x.
    1. Ministry of Health. Targeting Emergencies Shorter Stays in Emergency Departments. New Zealand: Wellington; 2011.
    1. Government of Western Australia. National Health Reform Agreement – National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services. 2011. .
    1. Freeman JV, Croft S, Cross S, Yap C, Mason S. The impact of the 4 h target on patient care and outcomes in the Emergency Department: an analysis of hospital incidence data. Emerg Med J. 2010;27:921–927. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.085431.
    1. Mason S, Locker T, Carter A, Walters S, Stride C, Casson J. What are the organisational factors that influence waiting times in Emergency Departments. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D; 2006.
    1. Munro J, Mason S, Nicholl J. Effectiveness of measures to reduce emergency department waiting times: a natural experiment. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:35e9.
    1. British Medical Association. Emergency Medicine-Report of national survey of emergency medicine. London: BMA: Health Policy and Economic Research Unit; 2007.
    1. Hauck K, Street A. Do targets matter? A comparison of English and Welsh national health priorities. Health Econ. 2007;16:275e90.
    1. Mayhew L, Smith D. Using queuing theory to analyse the Government’s 4-h completion time target in Accident and Emergency departments. Health Care Manag Sci. 2008;11:11e21.
    1. Morton A, Bevan G. What’s in a wait? Contrasting management science and economic perspectives on waiting for emergency care. Health Policy. 2008;85:207e17.
    1. Mortimore A, Cooper S. The ‘4-hour target’: emergency nurses’ views. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:402–404. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.044933.
    1. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: Department of Health; 2000.
    1. Department of Health. Reforming Emergency Care: first steps to a new approach. London: Department of Health; 2001.
    1. Wardrope J. Unlimited consumer demand would destroy the NHS. Br Med J. 2001;322:1369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1369.
    1. Miró Ó, Sánchez M, Espinosa G, Coll-Vinent B, Bragulat E, Millá J. Analysis of patient flow in the emergency department and the effect of an extensive reorganisation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:143–148. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.143.
    1. World Health Organisation. The WHO Report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
    1. Hood C. A public management for all seasons? Pub Adm. 1991;69:3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
    1. Gray A, Jenkins B. In: Markets and Managers: New Issues in the Delivery of Welfare. Taylor-Gooby P, Lawson R, editor. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1993. Markets, managers and the public service: the changing of a culture; pp. 9–23.
    1. Armstrong D. Space and time in British general practice. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20:659–666. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90054-1.
    1. Gillan A. When waiting turns to anger in A&E. The Guardian. 2000. .
    1. Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Collins; 2003. (A Manifesto for Business Revolution).
    1. Agency M. IDEA: Ideal Design of Emergency Access. London: Modernisation Agency; 2001.
    1. Cooke MW, Wilson S, Pearson S. The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:28–30. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.28.
    1. Cooke M, Fisher J, Dale J, McLeod E, Szczepura A, Walley P, Wilson S. Reducing Attendances and Waits in Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Present Innovations. Report of the National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO) Coventry: NCCSDO; 2004.
    1. Department of Health. National Standards, Local Action: Health and Social Care Standards and Planning Framework 2005/06-2007/08. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    1. Department of Health. Clinical Exceptions to the 4 hour Emergency Care Target. 2003. .
    1. Estates NHS. HBN 22 Accident and emergency facilities for adults and children. London: NHS Estates; 2003.
    1. National Audit Office. Improving Emergency Care in England. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
    1. Estates NHS. The impact of the built environment on care within A&E departments: Key findings and recommendations. London: NHS Estates; 2003.
    1. Estates NHS. A&E design evaluation. Evaluation of two proposed accident and emergency departments: Brent Emergency Care and Diagnostic centre at Central Middlesex Hospital, and an Exemplar Plan. London: NHS Estates; 2004.
    1. Hillier B, Vaughan L. The city as one thing. Prog Plann. 2007;67:205–230. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001.
    1. Penn A, Desyllas J, Vaughan L. The space of innovation: interaction and communication in the work environment. Environ Plann B. 1999;26:193–218. doi: 10.1068/b260193.
    1. Department of Health. Delivering the NHS Plan: next steps on investment, next steps on reform. London: Department of Health; 2002.
    1. Wait S. Benchmarking: a policy analysis. Nuffield Trust; 2004.
    1. Hamblin R, Ganesh J. Measure for measure: Using outcome measures to raise standards in the NHS. London: Policy Exchange; 2007.
    1. McGlynn EA, Shekelle P, Hussey P. Developing, disseminating and assessing standards in the National Health Service. Cambridge: RAND Health; 2008.
    1. Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:207–216. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1372.
    1. Royal College of Nursing. A&E Nursing Forum, ENPs: Guidelines. London: Royal College of Nursing; 1990.
    1. Royal College of Nursing. RCN Competences: Advanced nurse practitioners – an RCN guide to the advanced nurse practitioner role, competences and programme accreditation. London: Royal College of Nursing; 2010.
    1. Carter AJ, Chochinov AH. A systematic review of the impact of nurse practitioners on cost, quality of care, satisfaction and wait times in the emergency department. CJEM. 2007;9:286–295.
    1. Department of Health. Handbook to the NHS Constitution. London: Department of Health; 2013.
    1. Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizations, and social issues. Methods Inf Med. 2004;43:215–231.
    1. Orlikowski W, Iacono S. Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf Syst Res. 2001;12:121–124. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700.
    1. Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. The Slight Surprise of Integration. IFIP Int Fed Inf Process. 2005;185:261–274. doi: 10.1007/0-387-28918-6_20.
    1. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care - An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:542–549. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2384.
    1. Harrison A, Appleby J. The War on Waiting for Hospital Treatment: What Has Labour Achieved and what Challenges Remain: Summary. London: King's Fund; 2005.
    1. Calnan M. The Hospital Accident and Emergency Department: what is its Role? J Soc Policy. 1982;11:483–503. doi: 10.1017/S0047279400022546.
    1. Weber EJ, Mason S, Carter A, Hew RL. Emptying the Corridors of Shame: organizational Lessons From England’s 4-Hour Emergency Throughput Target. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.013.
    1. Reddy M, Dourish P. Proceedings of ACM CSCW’02. New York: ACM Press; 2002. Temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work; pp. 344–353.
    1. Zhou R, Costello J. Doctor's perspective: the ‘new’ UK 4-h target. Emerg Med J. 2013;30:84.
    1. Burström L, Starrin B, Engström M-L, Thulesius H. Waiting management at the emergency department–a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-95.
    1. Reddy MC, Dourish P, Pratt W. Temporality in Medical Work: time also Matters. Comput Support Coop Work. 2006;15:29–53. doi: 10.1007/s10606-005-9010-z.
    1. Sewell G. The discipline of teams: the control of team–based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Adm Sci Q. 1998;43:397–428. doi: 10.2307/2393857.
    1. Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP, Song M. Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad Manag J. 2001;44:1251–1262. doi: 10.2307/3069399.
    1. Prasopoulou E, Pouloudi A, Panteli N. Enacting new temporal boundaries: the role of mobile phones. Eur J Inf Syst. 2006;15:277–284. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000617.
    1. Lamont SS. ‘See and Treat’: spreading like wildfire? A qualitative study into factors affecting its introduction and spread. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:548–552. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.016303.
    1. Locker T, Mason S. Analysis of the distribution of time that patients spend in emergency departments. Br Med J. 2005;330:1188–1189. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Mason S, Nicholl J, Locker T. Targets still lead care in emergency departments. Br Med J. 2010;341:61.
    1. Mason S, Weber EJ, Coster J, Freeman J, Locker T. Time Patients Spend in the Emergency Department: England's 4-Hour Rule – A Case of Hitting the Target but Missing the Point? Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.017.
    1. Epstein M, Barmania N, Robini J, Harbo M. Reforming the acute phase of the inpatient journey. Clin Med. 2007;7:343–347. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-343.
    1. Malone RE. Distal nursing. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2317–2326. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00230-7.
    1. Ritzer G, Walczak D. Rationalization and the Deprofessionalisation of Physicians. Soc Forces. 1988;67:1–22. doi: 10.1093/sf/67.1.1.
    1. Stoop AP, Vrangbæk K, Berg M. Theory and practice of waiting time data as a performance indicator in health care: a case study from The Netherlands. Health Policy. 2005;73:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.10.002.
    1. Moffatt F, Martin P, Timmons S. Constructing notions of healthcare productivity: the call for a new professionalism? Sociol Health Illn. 2013. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12093.
    1. Power M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Regan G. Making a difference to A&E: analysis of the operational inefficiencies in A&E departments in major acute hospitals in Dublin. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000;8:54–61. doi: 10.1054/aaen.1999.0079.
    1. Baldwin LP, Low PH, Picton C, Young T. The use of mobile devices for information sharing in a technology-supported model of care in A&E. Int J Electron Healthc. 2007;3:90–106. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2007.011482.
    1. Taylor CJ, Bull F, Burdis C, Ferguson DG. Workload management in A&E: counting the uncountable and predicting the unpredictable. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997;14:88–91. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.2.88.
    1. Holden RJ. Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever