Eye-tracking-based assessment of cognitive function in low-resource settings

Linda Forssman, Per Ashorn, Ulla Ashorn, Kenneth Maleta, Andrew Matchado, Emma Kortekangas, Jukka M Leppänen, Linda Forssman, Per Ashorn, Ulla Ashorn, Kenneth Maleta, Andrew Matchado, Emma Kortekangas, Jukka M Leppänen

Abstract

Background: Early development of neurocognitive functions in infants can be compromised by poverty, malnutrition and lack of adequate stimulation. Optimal management of neurodevelopmental problems in infants requires assessment tools that can be used early in life, and are objective and applicable across economic, cultural and educational settings.

Objective and design: The present study examined the feasibility of infrared eye tracking as a novel and highly automated technique for assessing visual-orienting and sequence-learning abilities as well as attention to facial expressions in young (9-month-old) infants. Techniques piloted in a high-resource laboratory setting in Finland (N=39) were subsequently field-tested in a community health centre in rural Malawi (N=40).

Results: Parents' perception of the acceptability of the method (Finland 95%, Malawi 92%) and percentages of infants completing the whole eye-tracking test (Finland 95%, Malawi 90%) were high, and percentages of valid test trials (Finland 69-85%, Malawi 68-73%) satisfactory at both sites. Test completion rates were slightly higher for eye tracking (90%) than traditional observational tests (87%) in Malawi. The predicted response pattern indicative of specific cognitive function was replicated in Malawi, but Malawian infants exhibited lower response rates and slower processing speed across tasks.

Conclusions: High test completion rates and the replication of the predicted test patterns in a novel environment in Malawi support the feasibility of eye tracking as a technique for assessing infant development in low-resource setting. Further research is needed to the test-retest stability and predictive validity of the eye-tracking scores in low-income settings.

Keywords: Neurodevelopment; cognition; infant.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of eye-tracking sessions in Finland (top left) and Malawi (top right), and paradigms designed to test infants’ visual orientation abilities (visual search), sequence-learning abilities (switch task) and attention to facial expressions of emotion (disengagement).

References

    1. Nelson CA III, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. . Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest early intervention project. Science 2007;318:1937–40. 10.1126/science.1143921
    1. Georgieff MK. Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:614S–20S.
    1. Knudsen EI, Heckman JJ, Cameron JL, et al. . Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006;103:10155–62. 10.1073/pnas.0600888103
    1. Sabanathan S, Wills B, Gladstone M. Child development assessment tools in low-income and middle-income countries: how can we use them more appropriately? Arch Dis Child 2015;100:482–8. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308114
    1. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, et al. . Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet 2011;378:1325–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2
    1. Ringwalt S. Developmental screening and assessment instruments with an emphasis on social and emotional development for young children ages birth through five. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center, 2008.
    1. Rose SA, Feldman JF, Jankowski JJ. The building blocks of cognition. J Pediatr 2003;143:54–61. 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00402-5
    1. Wass SV, Forssman L, Leppänen JM. Robustness and precision. How data quality may influence key dependent variables in infant eyetracker analyses. Infancy 2014;19:427–60.
    1. Gredebäck G, Johnson S, von Hofsten C. Eye tracking in infancy research. Dev Neuropsychol 2009;35:1–19. 10.1080/87565640903325758
    1. Oakes LM. Advances in eye tracking in infancy research. Infancy 2012;17:1–8. 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00101.x
    1. Jones PR, Kalwarowsky S, Atkinson J, et al. . Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:8102–10. 10.1167/iovs.14-15108
    1. Kulke L, Atkinson J, Braddick O. Automatic Detection of Attention Shifts in Infancy: Eye Tracking in the Fixation Shift Paradigm. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0142505 10.1371/journal.pone.0142505
    1. Leppänen JM, Forssman L, Kaatiala J, et al. . Widely applicable MATLAB routines for automated analysis of saccadic reaction times. Behav Res Methods 2015;47:538–48. 10.3758/s13428-014-0473-z
    1. Ahtola E, Stjerna S, Yrttiaho S, et al. . Dynamic Eye Tracking Based Metrics for Infant Gaze Patterns in the Face-Distractor Competition Paradigm. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e97299 10.1371/journal.pone.0097299
    1. Dougherty TM, Haith MM. Infant expectations and reaction time as predictors of childhood speed of processing and IQ. Dev Psychol 1997;33:146–55. 10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.146
    1. Rose SA, Feldman JF, Jankowski JJ. Implications of Infant Cognition for Executive Functions at Age 11. Psychol Sci 2012;23:1345–55. 10.1177/0956797612444902
    1. Peltola MJ, Forssman L, Puura K, et al. . Attention to faces expressing negative emotion at 7 months predicts attachment security at 14 months. Child Dev 2015;86:1321–32. 10.1111/cdev.12380
    1. Elison JT, Paterson SJ, Wolff JJ, et al. . White matter microstructure and atypical visual orienting in 7-month-olds at risk for autism. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:899–908. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12091150
    1. Kaldy Z, Kraper C, Carter AS, et al. . Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder are more successful at visual search than typically developing toddlers. Dev Sci 2011;14:980–8. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01053.x
    1. Kovács ÁM, Mehler J. Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009;106:6556–60. 10.1073/pnas.0811323106
    1. Peltola MJ, Hietanen JK, Forssman L, et al. . The Emergence and Stability of the Attentional Bias to Fearful Faces in Infancy. Infancy 2013;18:905–26. 10.1111/infa.12013
    1. Forssman L, Peltola MJ, Yrttiaho S, et al. . Regulatory variant of the TPH2 gene and early life stress are associated with heightened attention to social signals of fear in infants. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014;55:793–801. 10.1111/jcpp.12181
    1. Mundy P, Delgado C, Block J, et al. . A manual for the Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS). University of Miami Psychology Department, 2003.
    1. WHO. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Pædiatrica 2006;95:76–85.
    1. Rose SA. Relation between Physical Growth and Information Processing in Infants Born in India. Child Dev 1994;65:889–902. 10.2307/1131426

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever