Prone position in wards for spontaneous breathing Covid-19 patients: a retrospective study

Johan Wormser, Christophe Romanet, François Philippart, Johan Wormser, Christophe Romanet, François Philippart

Abstract

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) caused a large number of non-ventilated hypoxemic patients to require the use of prone position. The aim of this study is to measure the efficiency and tolerance of prone positioning in ward hypoxemic patients treated for Covid-19. This retrospective study included confirmed Covid-19 hypoxemic patients treated by at least one prone position session. Primary outcome was pulse oximetry over inspired oxygen fraction ratio (SpO2/FiO2) before, during, and after prone position. Secondary outcomes were failure, adverse events, and poor tolerance rate. Twenty-seven patients were included. During first, second and third sessions, SpO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly higher during posture than before (p < 0.0001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 respectively). Eighteen patients were responders (defined as an improvement of SpO2/FiO2 of more than 50) during the first posture and have a shorter length of hospital stay than non-responder patients. Failure rate was 5%, and poor tolerance and adverse events rates were 8% and 7% respectively. Our study found that prone position in wards improved alveolar exchange during posture and is well tolerated. This technique could be used in any medical ward.

Keywords: Acute respiratory failure; Covid-19; Hypoxemia; Oxygenation; Tolerance; Wards.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2021. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SpO2/FiO2 ratio before, during, and after prone position. a First prone position (n = 24): ****p < 0.0001 between before and during prone position. b Second prone position (n = 15): **p < 0.01 between before and during prone position. c Third prone position (n = 13): ***p < 0.001 between before and during prone position. PP, prone position; ns, non-significance

References

    1. Ceylan Z. Estimation of COVID-19 prevalence in Italy, Spain, and France. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729:138817. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138817.
    1. Elharrar X, Trigui Y, Dols AM, et al. Use of prone positioning in nonintubated patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2336–2338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8255.
    1. Sartini C, Tresoldi M, Scarpellini P, et al. Respiratory parameters in patients with COVID-19 after using noninvasive ventilation in the prone position outside the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2338–2340. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7861.
    1. Coppo A, Bellani G, Winterton D, et al. Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(8):765–774. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30268-X.
    1. Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R (2020) Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED’s experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Emerg Med 27(5):375–378. 10.1111/acem.13994
    1. Ng Z, Tay WC, Ho CHB. Awake prone positioning for non-intubated oxygen dependent COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(1):2001198. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01198-2020.
    1. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007;132(2):410–417. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0617.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever