Methods in obtaining split-thickness skin grafts from skin reduction surgery specimens

Rebecca E Bruccoleri, Michael K Matthew, John T Schulz, Rebecca E Bruccoleri, Michael K Matthew, John T Schulz

Abstract

Background: To devise a method for obtaining bacterial culture-negative split-thickness skin grafts from specimens removed from living donors undergoing skin reduction surgery.

Methods: Specimens were obtained from patients undergoing abdominal skin reduction surgery in inpatient and outpatient surgical settings. Skin specimens were cleaned in a method adapted from the former Yale Skin Bank's methods. The specimens were attached to the autoclave container for the dermatome using towel clips or sutures to provide tension. Normal saline clysis was injected subdermally and a Padgett Electric Dermatome was used to obtain skin grafts. These were then photographed and discarded.

Results: Eight specimens were obtained from seven women and one man. The mean age was 46.6 years and mean weight at time of surgery was 87.7 kg. Bacterial cultures obtained from all specimens were negative. All procured grafts were transparent, with visible dermis, suggesting that they could be used in a clinical setting.

Conclusion: Bacterial culture-negative split-thickness skin grafts can be obtained from skin reduction surgery specimens, offering a potential source of split-thickness allograft during regional or national shortages.

Keywords: Abdominoplasty; Dermatome; Living donor; Skin graft.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Skin bed of skin graft specimen after graft acquisition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Skin bed of skin graft specimen after graft acquisition along with the graft obtained

References

    1. American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB) (2007) Annual Survey of Accredited Tissue Banks in the United States. AATB, McLean, VA
    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2013) 2013 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.
    1. Brown JB, McDowell F. Massive Repairs of Burns with thick split skin grafts: emergency “dressings” with homografts. Ann Surg. 1942;115:658–674. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194204000-00017.
    1. Brown JB, Fryer MP, Randall P, Lu M. Postmortem homografts as ‘biological dressings’ for extensive burn and denuded areas. Ann Surg. 1953;138:618–630. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195310000-00015.
    1. Code of Federal Regulations (2009) SuDoc class number: AE 2.106/3:21/. Title 21—food and drugs. April 1, 2009. Part: 1271.85(d), pp 727–728.
    1. Hansbrough J. Wound coverage with biologic dressings and culture skin substitutes. Austin: R.G. Landes Company; 1992.
    1. Jackson D. A clinical study of the use of skin homografts for burn. Br J Plast Surg. 1954;7:26–43. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1226(54)80004-X.
    1. MacMillan BG. Homograft skin: a valuable adjunct to the treatment of thermal burns. J Trauma. 1962;2:130–141. doi: 10.1097/00005373-196203000-00004.
    1. Rogers MF, Simonds RJ, Lawton KE, Moseley RR, Jones WK. Guidelines for preventing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus through transplantation of human tissue and organs. MMWR. 1994;43(RR-8):1–17.
    1. Swartz WM, Rueckert F, Brown FE. Panniculectomy specimens as a convenient and inexpensive source of homograft skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55(5):628–629. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197505000-00022.
    1. Wang D, et al. Evaluation of the potential risk of Hepatitis B Virus transmission in skin allografting. Transplant Proc. 2015

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever