In vitro effects of hydroxyapatite containing toothpastes on dentin permeability after multiple applications and ageing

Karl-Anton Hiller, Wolfgang Buchalla, Isabel Grillmeier, Christina Neubauer, Gottfried Schmalz, Karl-Anton Hiller, Wolfgang Buchalla, Isabel Grillmeier, Christina Neubauer, Gottfried Schmalz

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of toothpastes with different active ingredients on dentin permeability using an extended protocol including multiple applications and several thermal ageing cycles in the presence or absence of human saliva. The Null hypothesis was that dentin permeability of a hydroxyapatite containing toothpaste (BR), a potassium nitrate (SP) and an arginine and calcium carbonate (EH) containing toothpaste were similar. Dentin permeability was measured as hydraulic conductance using a commercially available capillary flow system (Flodec, Geneva) and results were expressed as % relative to matching controls. Without saliva, the ranking (best first) of dentin permeability was BR(61%) < SP(87%) < EH(118%), with saliva EH(63%) < SP(72%) < BR(88%). Saliva increased or decreased permeability dependent upon the test material. BR reduced dentin permeability significantly more in absence of saliva, with saliva EH was superior to BR. Repeated material application decreased and thermal ageing increased dentin permeability. The different tooth pastes reduced permeability differently, the best being BR without saliva, the least EH without saliva. The newly introduced test conditions (ageing, saliva, multiple applications) influenced single results significantly, and as they better simulate the in vivo situation they should be considered to be included in further in vitro permeability testing of desensitizing preparations.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results for controls. Relative Hydraulic conductance rLp (%) for controls tested, without (for UC and AL) and with (for UC only) saliva for 6 measurement points. Dotted line represents baseline (t0) measurements which were set to 100% for each single dentin slice. AL was not measured at t3 and t5. Depicted are Medians and 25–75% Quantiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the results. Area coefficients (%) of materials tested without and with saliva. To gain an overview of the results, for each dentin slice the area under its rLp curve (abszissa: measurement time; ordinate: corresponding rLp value) was calculated, related to matching areas under the curves of the untreated controls (UC), and expressed as % (area coefficient; 100% ~ area under the curve of untreated control slices). Dotted and dashed lines depict the area coefficients of untreated controls (set to 100%) and AL, respectively. Depicted are Medians and 25–75% Quantiles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results (rLp) related to time points. Relative Hydraulic conductance rLp (%) for materials tested, without (left) and with (right) saliva for six measurement points. Baseline hydraulic conductance was set to 100% and visualized as dotted horizontal lines. Depicted are Medians and 25–75% Quantiles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results (ΔrLp) related to time differences. Successive differences of relative Hydraulic conductance ΔrLp (%) for materials tested, without (left) and with (right) saliva for six measurement intervals. Depicted are Medians and 25–75% Quantiles.
Figure 5
Figure 5
SEM, surface view of untreated controls. SEM visualization of the dentin surface of untreated controls (UC) before (t1) and after third thermal ageing period (t6), without and with saliva application at original magnifications of x 5,000 under environmental conditions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
SEM, surface view at t1. SEM visualization of the dentin surface after first material application and before first thermal ageing (t1) for toothpastes containing hydroxyapatite (BR), potassium nitrate (SP), and calcium carbonate and arginine (EH), without and with saliva at original magnifications of x5,000 and x20,000 under environmental conditions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
SEM, surface view at t2. SEM visualization of the dentin surface after first material application and after first thermal ageing period (t2) for toothpastes containing hydroxyapatite (BR), potassium nitrate (SP), and calcium carbonate and arginine (EH), without and with saliva, at original magnifications of x 5,000 and x 20,000 under environmental conditions.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Data treatment. Printout of original data (recorded by the Flodec software; dotted) and the corresponding linear fit (red line) for calculation of hydraulic conductance (Lp) with resulting slope b[1] and correlation coefficient r2.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Details of the experimental setup. (a) open permeability chamber, facing surfaces are covered with a silicone mat to hold five dentin slices. (b) detailed view of dentin slices within the silicone mats on one part of the permeability chamber. (c) Flodec apparatus connected to the closed permeability chamber. (d) complete experimental setup. (A) water column with reservoir; (B) closed permeability chamber; (C) tube for deaeration; (D) Flodec measuring unit including glass capillary with a constant inner diameter of 873 µm (details see Fig. 10); (E) dentin slice holder for thermal ageing. Copyright of the Flodec logo given to Macmillan Publishers Ltd, part of Springer Nature.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Flodec measuring unit in detail. The glass capillary (F) as a part of the unit and the closed permeability chamber (B; details see Fig. 9) are connected with a tube, and a dentin slice, which is inserted into the permeability chamber (B) may be permeated by opening the appropriate 3-way valve (D). Tap (C) and connected syringe are used to deareate the system. Tap (A) is the lower part of the water column (see Fig. 9(d)). Apparatus (G) is a custom made holder for material or saliva application onto dentin slices, and (H) shows the dentin slice holder for thermal ageing. Copyright of the Flodec logo given to Macmillan Publishers Ltd, part of Springer Nature.

References

    1. Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Nunez LJ, Stoll J, Weis K. Permeability characteristics of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions. J. Endod. 2001;27:23–30. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200101000-00007.
    1. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 69, 221–226 (2003).
    1. Gillam DG. Current diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office: an overview. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S21–S29. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0911-1.
    1. Miglani S, Aggarwal V, Ahuja B. Dentin hypersensitivity: Recent trends in management. J. Conserv. Dent. 2010;13:218–224. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.73385.
    1. Poulsen, S., Errboe, M., Lescay, M. Y. & Glenny, A. M. Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev. CD001476 (2006).
    1. Turp JC. Discussion: how can we improve diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office? Clin. Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S53–S54. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0913-z.
    1. Splieth CH, Tachou A. Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S3–S8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0889-8.
    1. Taha, S. The prevalence of Dentine Hypersensitivity in Dentine Hypersensitivity: Advances in Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment (ed. Gillam, D. G.) 41–47 (Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015).
    1. Jacobsen PL, Bruce G. Clinical dentin hypersensitivity: understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2001;2:1–12.
    1. Olley RC, Moazzez R, Bartlett D. The relationship between incisal/occlusal wear, dentine hypersensitivity and time after the last acid exposure in vivo. J. Dent. 2015;43:248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.002.
    1. Trushkowsky RD, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin hypersensitivity: differential diagnosis, tests, and etiology. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2014;35:99–104.
    1. West NX, Lussi A, Seong J, Hellwig E. Dentin hypersensitivity: pain mechanisms and aetiology of exposed cervical dentin. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S9–19. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0887-x.
    1. Cunha-Cruz J, et al. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2013;144:288–296. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0116.
    1. Bekes K, John MT, Schaller HG, Hirsch C. Oral health-related quality of life in patients seeking care for dentin hypersensitivity. J. Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01901.x.
    1. Gillam DG, Seo HS, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population. J. Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:710–714. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00436.x.
    1. Pereira,J. C. et al. Current and Novel Clinical Approaches for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity in Dentine Hypersensitivity: Advances in Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment (ed. Gillam, D. G.) 101–132 (Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015).
    1. Birang R, Poursamimi J, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med. Sci. 2007;22:21–24. doi: 10.1007/s10103-006-0412-z.
    1. Shetty S, Kohad R, Yeltiwar R, Shetty K. Comparative evaluation of hydroxyapatite, potassium nitrate and sodium monofluorophosphate as in office desensitising agents - a double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral Hyg Health. 2013;1:104.
    1. Low, B., Allen, E. P. & Kontogiorgos, E. D. Reduction in dental hypersensitivity with nano-hydroxyapatite, potassium nitrate, sodium monoflurophosphate and antioxidants. Open. Dent. J.92–97 (2015).
    1. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. The efficacy of potassium salts as agents for treating dentin hypersensitivity. J. Orofac. Pain. 2000;14:9–19.
    1. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2006;137:990–998. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321.
    1. Martens LC. A decision tree for the management of exposed cervical dentin (ECD) and dentin hypersensitivity (DHS) Clin. Oral Investig. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S77–S83. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0898-7.
    1. Harks I, et al. Impact of the Daily Use of a Microcrystal Hydroxyapatite Dentifrice on De Novo Plaque Formation and Clinical/Microbiological Parameters of Periodontal Health. A Randomized Trial. PLoS. One. 2016;11:e0160142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160142.
    1. Peetsch A, Epple M. Characterization of the solid components of three desensitizing toothpastes and a mouth wash. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik. 2011;42:131–135. doi: 10.1002/mawe.201100744.
    1. Porciani PF, Chazine M, Grandini S. A clinical study of the efficacy of a new chewing gum containing calcium hydroxyapatite in reducing dentin hypersensitivity. J. Clin. Dent. 2014;25:32–36.
    1. Karim BF, Gillam DG. The efficacy of strontium and potassium toothpastes in treating dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review. Int. J. Dent. 2013;2013:573258. doi: 10.1155/2013/573258.
    1. Roveri N, et al. Synthetic biomimetic carbonate-hydroxyapatite nanocrystals for enamel remineralization. Advanced Materials Research. 2008;47:821–824. doi: 10.4028/.
    1. Saeki K, Marshall GW, Gansky SA, Parkinson CR, Marshall SJ. Strontium effects on root dentin tubule occlusion and nanomechanical properties. Dent. Mater. 2016;32:240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.020.
    1. Petzold M. The influence of different fluoride compounds and treatment conditions on dental enamel: a descriptive in vitro study of the CaF(2) precipitation and microstructure. Caries Res. 2001;35(Suppl 1):45–51. doi: 10.1159/000049110.
    1. Cummins D. Recent advances in dentin hypersensitivity: clinically proven treatments for instant and lasting sensitivity relief. Am. J. Dent. 2010;23(Spec No A):3A–13A.
    1. Kleinberg I. SensiStat. A new saliva-based composition for simple and effective treatment of dentinal sensitivity pain. Dent. Today. 2002;21:42–47.
    1. Douglas de Oliveira DW, et al. Effectiveness of Three Desensitizing Dentifrices on Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Pilot Clinical Trial. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 2016;18:57–65.
    1. Rimondini L, et al. The remineralizing effect of carbonate-hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on dentine. Materials Science Forum. 2007;539-543:602–605. doi: 10.4028/.
    1. Gopinath NM, John J, Nagappan N, Prabhu S, Kumar ES. Evaluation of Dentifrice Containing Nano-hydroxyapatite for Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized ControlledTrial. J. Int. Oral Health. 2015;7:118–122.
    1. Orsini G, et al. A double-blind randomized-controlled trial comparing the desensitizing efficacy of a new dentifrice containing carbonate/hydroxyapatite nanocrystals and a sodium fluoride/potassium nitrate dentifrice. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010;37:510–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01558.x.
    1. Orsini G, et al. A 3-day randomized clinical trial to investigate the desensitizing properties of three dentifrices. J. Periodontol. 2013;84:e65–e73.
    1. Wang L, et al. Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity Using Nano-Hydroxyapatite Pastes: A Randomized Three-Month Clinical Trial. Oper. Dent. 2016;41:E93–E101. doi: 10.2341/15-145-C.
    1. Jungbluth H, Attin T, Buchalla W. Development and validation of an in vitro model for measurements of cervical root dentine permeability. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014;18:2077–2086. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1194-5.
    1. Reeder OW, Jr., Walton RE, Livingston MJ, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: determinants of hydraulic conductance. J. Dent. Res. 1978;57:187–193. doi: 10.1177/00220345780570020601.
    1. Sharma D, Hong CX, Heipp PS. A novel potassium oxalate-containing tooth-desensitising mouthrinse: a comparative in vitro study. J. Dent. 2013;41(Suppl 4):S18–S27. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(13)70003-4.
    1. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH, Horner JA. The permeability of dentine from bovine incisors in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 1989;34:773–777. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(89)90027-7.
    1. Cummins D. Dentin hypersensitivity: from diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J. Clin. Dent. 2009;20:1–9.
    1. Cummins D. Advances in the clinical management of dentin hypersensitivity: a review of recent evidence for the efficacy of dentifrices in providing instant and lasting relief. J. Clin. Dent. 2011;22:100–107.
    1. Kawasaki K, Kambara M, Matsumura H. Norde,W. A comparison of the adsorption of saliva proteins and some typical proteins onto the surface of hydroxyapatite. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2003;32:321–334. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.07.001.
    1. Hay DI. The interaction of human parotid salivary proteins with hydroxyapatite. Arch. Oral Biol. 1973;18:1517–1529. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(73)90127-1.
    1. Jensen JL, Lamkin MS, Oppenheim FG. Adsorption of human salivary proteins to hydroxyapatite: a comparison between whole saliva and glandular salivary secretions. J. Dent. Res. 1992;71:1569–1576. doi: 10.1177/00220345920710090501.
    1. Lamkin MS, Arancillo AA, Oppenheim FG. Temporal and compositional characteristics of salivary protein adsorption to hydroxyapatite. J. Dent. Res. 1996;75:803–808. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021101.
    1. Heller, D., Helmerhorst, E. J. & Oppenheim, F. G. Saliva and Serum Protein Exchange at the Tooth Enamel Surface. J. Dent. Res. (2016).
    1. Cannabrava VP, et al. Bleaching technique effect on dentin permeability. Am. J. Dent. 2014;27:145–148.
    1. de la Macorra JC, Escribano NI. Comparison of two methods to measure permeability of dentin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002;63:531–534. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10310.
    1. Tolvanen M, Lahti S, Hausen H. Changes in toothbrushing frequency in relation to changes in oral health-related knowledge and attitudes among children - a longitudinal study. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2010;118:284–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00737.x.
    1. Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012;16:1117–1124. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0619-7.
    1. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2014;26:382–393. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12100.
    1. Ruhl S, et al. Integrity of proteins in human saliva after sterilization by gamma irradiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:749–755. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01374-10.
    1. Ruhl S. The scientific exploration of saliva in the post-proteomic era: from database back to basic function. Expert. Rev. Proteomics. 2012;9:85–96. doi: 10.1586/epr.11.80.
    1. Farooq I, Moheet IA, AlShwaimi E. In vitro dentin tubule occlusion and remineralization competence of various toothpastes. Arch. Oral Biol. 2015;60:1246–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.05.012.
    1. Amaechi BT, Mathews SM, Ramalingam K, Mensinkai PK. Evaluation of nanohydroxyapatite-containing toothpaste for occluding dentin tubules. Am. J. Dent. 2015;28:33–39.
    1. Huttemann RW, Donges H. [Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity with hydroxylapatite] Dtsch. Zahnarztl. Z. 1987;42:486–488.
    1. Cummins D. Clinical evidence for the superior efficacy of a dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. J. Clin. Dent. 2011;22:97–99.
    1. Gupta, R. Synthesis of precipitated calcium carbonate nanoparticles using modified emulsion membranes. Georgia Institute of Technology. Ref Type: Thesis/Dissertation (2004).
    1. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization”. Oper. Dent. 2000;25:26–32.
    1. Miller, R. G. Simultaneous statistical inference (1981).

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever