Is nebulized saline a placebo in COPD?

Shahina Y Khan, B Ronan O'Driscoll, Shahina Y Khan, B Ronan O'Driscoll

Abstract

Background: Many trials of nebulized therapy have used nebulized saline as a "placebo". However, nebulized isotonic saline is sometimes used to assist sputum expectoration and relieve breathlessness in COPD patients. We designed this study to establish if nebulized saline had a placebo effect or a clinical effect.

Methods: 40 patients were studied following hospital admission for exacerbated COPD (mean FEV1 30% predicted). Patients were randomised to single-blind administration of either 4 mls of nebulized isotonic saline using an efficient nebulizer (active group n = 20) or an inefficient nebulizer (placebo group n = 20). Spirometry and subjective breathlessness scores (Modified Likert Scale) were measured before nebulized treatment and 10 minutes after treatment.

Results: There was no significant change in FEV1 after active or placebo nebulized saline treatment. Patients reported a 4% improvement in mean breathlessness score following placebo (Wilcoxon test; p = 0.37) compared with 23% improvement following active nebulized saline (p = 0.0001). 65% of patients given active nebulized saline but only 5% of the placebo group reported that mucus expectoration was easier after the treatment.

Conclusions: This study lends support to the current use of nebulized saline to relieve breathlessness (possibly by facilitating sputum clearance) in COPD patients. Lung function was not affected. Nebulized saline can therefore be used as a placebo in bronchodilator studies involving COPD patients but it cannot be used as a placebo in trials assessing symptom relief.

References

    1. Sutton PP, Gemmell HG, Innes N, Davidson J, Smith FW, Legge JS, Friend JA. Use of nebulized saline and nebulized terbutaline as an adjunct to chest physiotherapy. Thorax. 1988;43:57–60.
    1. Eng PA, Morton J, Douglass JA, Riedler J, Wilson J, Cobertson CF. Short-term efficacy of ultrasonically nebulized hypertonic saline in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Pulmonol. 1996;21:77–83. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199602)21:2<77::AID-PPUL3>;2-R.
    1. Poole PJ, Brodie SM, Stewart JM, Black PN. The effects of nebulized isotonic saline and terbutaline on breathlessness in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Aust NZ J Med. 1998;28:322–326.
    1. Conway JH, Fleming JS, Perring S, Holgate ST. Humidification as an adjunct to chest physiotherapy in aiding tracheo-bronchial clearance in patients with bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 1992;86:109–114.
    1. Vlachos-Mayer H, Leigh R, Sharon RF, Hussack P, Hargreave FE. Success and safety of sputum induction in the clinical setting. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:997–1000. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00.16599700.
    1. Rytila PH, Lindqvist AE, Laitinen LA. Safety of sputum induction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:1116–1119. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.01522.x.
    1. Wark AB, Simpson JL, Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Safety of sputum induction with isotonic saline in adults with acute severe asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31:1745–1753. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01230.x.
    1. Sutherland ER, Pak J, Langmack EL, Silkoff PE, Martin RJ. Safety of sputum induction in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory Medicine. 2002;96:482–486. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1342.
    1. Cataldo D, Foidart JM, Lau L, Bartsch P, Djukanovic R, Louis R. Induced Sputum: Comparison between isotonic and hypertonic saline solutions in patients with asthma. Chest. 2001;120:1815–1821. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1815.
    1. Jenkins SC, Heaton RW, Fulton TJ, Moxham J. Comparison of domiciliary nebulized salbutamol and salbutamol from a metered dose inhaler in stable chronic airflow limitation. Chest. 1987;91:804–07.
    1. Goldman JM, Teale C, Muers MF. Simplifying the assessment of patients with chronic airflow limitation for home nebulizer therapy. Respiratory Medicine. 1992;86:33–38.
    1. Boe J, Dennis JH, O'Driscoll BR. European Respiratory Society Guidelines on the use of nebulizers. European Respiratory Journal. 2001;18:228–242. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00220001.
    1. O'Driscoll BR, Kay EA, Taylor RJ, Bernstein A. Home nebulizers: can optimal therapy be predicted by laboratory studies? Respiratory Medicine. 1990;84:471–477.
    1. O'Driscoll BR. Nebulizers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1997;52:S49–52.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever