The Ewing Amputation: The First Human Implementation of the Agonist-Antagonist Myoneural Interface

Tyler R Clites, Hugh M Herr, Shriya S Srinivasan, Anthony N Zorzos, Matthew J Carty, Tyler R Clites, Hugh M Herr, Shriya S Srinivasan, Anthony N Zorzos, Matthew J Carty

Abstract

Background: The agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) comprises a surgical construct and neural control architecture designed to serve as a bidirectional interface, capable of reflecting proprioceptive sensation of prosthetic joint position, speed, and torque from and advanced limb prosthesis onto the central nervous system. The AMI surgical procedure has previously been vetted in animal models; we here present the surgical results of its translation to human subjects.

Methods: Modified unilateral below knee amputations were performed in the elective setting in 3 human subjects between July 2016 and April 2017. AMIs were constructed in each subject to control and interpret proprioception from the bionic ankle and subtalar joints. Intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative residual-limb outcome measures were recorded and analyzed, including electromyographic and radiographic imaging of AMI musculature.

Results: Mean subject age was 38 ± 13 years, and mean body mass index was 29.5 ± 5.5 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 346 ± 87 minutes, including 120 minutes of tourniquet time per subject. Complications were minor and included transient cellulitis and one instance of delayed wound healing. All subjects demonstrated mild limb hypertrophy postoperatively, and intact construct excursion with volitional muscle activation. All patients reported a high degree of phantom limb position perception with no reports of phantom pain.

Conclusions: The AMI offers the possibility of improved prosthetic control and restoration of muscle-tendon proprioception. Initial results in this first cohort of human patients are promising and provide evidence as to the potential role of AMIs in the care of patients requiring below knee amputation.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Conceptual illustration of the AMI. Mechanical linkage of innervated muscles restores natural contracture-stretch relationships, leading to activation of native mechanoreceptors and bi-directional communication with the central nervous system. AMI function is described as follows: at rest, both AMI muscles are at resting length and tension. When the agonist muscle contracts under volitional or reflexive activation, the antagonist is passively stretched, causing increased spindle discharge in the antagonist. This spindle activity is interpreted by the central nervous system (CNS) as a change in phantom joint position. Force feedback is provided to the CNS as artificial stimulation of the antagonist muscle causes it to contract in opposition to the agonist, creating tension at the agonist musculotendinous junction and increasing agonist Golgi tendon organ (GTO) discharge. This is interpreted by the CNS as torque about the phantom joint. A representation of muscle spindle and GTO state is shown for each condition.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Operative technique. A, Standard below knee amputation incision pattern. B, Tension marking sutures on component muscles. C, Disinsertion of component muscles. D, Isolation of tibia and fibula in preparation for osteotomies. E, Harvesting of tarsal tunnels from amputated distal limb. F, Tarsal tunnel with native tendon component. G, Placement of suture anchors for tarsal tunnel fixation to anterior tibia. H, Position of tarsal tunnels on anterior tibia following fixation.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Displays operative site closure.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Schematic illustration of the Ewing amputation. Two AMIs are constructed in the residuum at the time of primary transtibial amputation. Tarsal tunnels harvested from the amputated ankle joint are affixed to the medial flat of the tibia and serve as pulleys for the AMIs. When the patient is connected to a robotic prosthesis, the proximal and distal AMIs are myoelectrically linked to the prosthetic ankle and subtalar joints, respectively. In the diagram, suture points are denoted by blue crosses and tantalum beads are denoted by yellow circles. Positioning of these elements are representative, and not to scale.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Postoperative sequelae. A, Mild cellulitis was noted overlying the AMI constructs in 2 subjects 2 weeks after amputation; both resolved with oral antibiotic therapy. B, Development of a nonpainful pseudobursa overlying the AMI constructs was noted in 2 patients. C, Preservation of muscle bulk in the residual limb and slight prominence of AMI constructs required minor modifications in prosthesis socket design for all three study subjects.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Plain radiograph of residual limb. Radiopaque tantalum beads illustrate intact position of AMI constructs in the residuum, 6 weeks after the operative procedure.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Ultrasound evidence of dynamic AMI muscle relationships. Patients were asked to cyclically move the phantom ankle from approximately 80% dorsiflexion through approximately 80% plantar flexion, while ultrasound from the proximal tarsal tunnel and EMG from AMI muscles were simultaneously recorded. A representative sample is shown from patient 2. Tendon travel measurements are normalized to the length of the patient’s medial tibial flat. EMG values are normalized to the maximum EMG recorded from a given trial.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
EMG amplitude during volitional movement of the phantom limb. AMI patients showed a repeatable generation of activation in muscles typically associated with each desired movement (A), an improved ability to limit muscle activation in muscles not associated with the desired movement (B), and a decrease in unintended co-contraction (C). Error bars depict standard error. Asterisk indicates significant difference at α = 0.02.

References

    1. Herr H, Clites T, Srinivasan S, et al. Limb loss as salvage: reinventing amputation for the 21st Century. 2018.
    1. Souza JM, Cheesborough JE, Ko JH, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2984.
    1. Brown BJ, Iorio ML, Klement M, et al. Outcomes after 294 transtibial amputations with the posterior myocutaneous flap. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2014;13:33.
    1. Kuiken T, Li G, Lock B, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA. 2009;301:619.
    1. Hargrove LJ, Simon AM, Young AJ, et al. Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1237.
    1. Baldwin J, Moon J, Cederna P, et al. Early muscle revascularization and regeneration at the regenerative peripheral nerve interface. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:73.
    1. Urbanchek M, Baghmanli Z, Wei B, et al. Long-term stability of regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4S):88
    1. Kung TA, Langhals NB, Martin DC, et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1380.
    1. Herr HM, Riso RR, Song KW, et al. Peripheral neural interface via nerve regeneration to distal tissues. US20160346099. 2016.
    1. Herr HM, Clites TR, Maimon B, et al. Method and system for providing proprioceptive feedback and functionality mitigating limb pathology. 2016;62.
    1. Clites TR, Carty MJ, Srinivasan S, et al. A murine model of a novel surgical architecture for proprioceptive muscle feedback and its potential application to control of advanced limb prostheses. J Neural Eng. 2017;14:036002.
    1. Srinivasan SS, Carty MJ, Calvaresi PW, et al. On prosthetic control : a regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interface. 2017;2:eaan2971.
    1. Clites TR, Carty MJ, Herr HM. A caprine model of a novel amputation paradigm for bi-directional neural control of a bionic limb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5(4S):119
    1. Clites TR, Carty MJ, Ullauri JB, et al. Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaap8373.
    1. Srinivasan S, Diaz M, Carty M, et al. Towards functional restoration for persons with limb amputation: a dual-stage implementation of regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces. 2018.
    1. Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL, 3rd, et al. Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;81:2173.
    1. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature. 1995;375:482.
    1. Flor H, Nikolajsen L, Staehelin Jensen T. Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:873.
    1. MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, et al. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain. 2008;131:2181.
    1. Woo SL, Kung TA, Brown DL, et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for the treatment of postamputation neuroma pain: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e1038.
    1. Smith AM. The coactivation of antagonist muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1981;59:733.
    1. De Luca CJ, Mambrito B. Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:525.
    1. Dimitriou M. Human muscle spindle sensitivity reflects the balance of activity between antagonistic muscles. J Neurosci. 2014;34:13644.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever