Delayed mirror visual feedback presented using a novel mirror therapy system enhances cortical activation in healthy adults

Hsin-Min Lee, Ping-Chia Li, Shih-Chen Fan, Hsin-Min Lee, Ping-Chia Li, Shih-Chen Fan

Abstract

Background: Mirror visual feedback (MVF) generated in mirror therapy (MT) with a physical mirror promotes the recovery of hemiparetic limbs in patients with stroke, but is limited in that it cannot provide an asymmetric mode for bimanual coordination training. Here, we developed a novel MT system that can manipulate the MVF to resolve this issue. The aims of this pilot study were to examine the feasibility of delayed MVF on MT and to establish its effects on cortical activation in order to understand how it can be used for clinical applications in the future.

Methods: Three conditions (no MVF, MVF, and 2-s delayed MVF) presented via our digital MT system were evaluated for their time-course effects on cortical activity by event-related desynchronization (ERD) of mu rhythm electroencephalography (EEG) during button presses in 18 healthy adults. Phasic ERD areas, defined as the areas of the relative ERD curve that were below the reference level and within -2-0 s (P0), 0-2 s (P1), and 2-4 s (P2) of the button press, were used.

Results: The overall (P0 to P2) and phasic ERD areas were higher when MVF was provided compared to when MVF was not provided for all EEG channels (C3, Cz, and C4). Phasic ERD areas in the P2 phase only increased during the delayed-MVF condition. Significant enhancement of cortical activation in the mirror neuron system and an increase in attention to the unseen limb may play major roles in the response to MVF during MT. In comparison to the no MVF condition, the higher phasic ERD areas that were observed during the P1 phase in the delayed-MVF condition indicate that the image of the still hand may have enhanced the cortical activation that occurred in response to the button press.

Conclusions: This study is the first to achieve delayed MVF for upper-limb MT. Our approach confirms previous findings regarding the effects of MVF on cortical activation and contributes additional evidence supporting the use of this method in the future for upper-limb motor training in patients with stroke.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the digital mirror therapy system. The host personal computer (PC) (a) captures images of the active hand via a high definition (HD) webcam (b) placed above the movement area of the therapy table (c). The host PC sends the processed images (vertically mirrored) to the mirror area (an HD monitor) of the therapy table
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Processing of the event-related desynchronization (ERD) curve, overall ERD area, and phasic ERD areas (data from the Cz channel of one subject in the no-mirror visual feedback condition). a The processed surface electromyography (EMG) signal was used to define the start point of the press movement. b Filtered electroencephalography (EEG) epochs (n = 50) for the mu rhythm (8–12 Hz). c The filtered EEG epochs were squared and averaged to form the mu rhythm ERD signal. d The relative ERD power curve ( % of the reference level) was formed by smoothing the raw ERD signal (each grey dot over the 250-ms time window). e The overall ERD area was defined as the averaged area of the entire ERD curve below the reference level. We used the area to quantify the cortical activation in response to the button press. f According to the phasic ERD areas for the P0 (-2–0 s), P1 (0–2 s), and P2 (2–4 s) phases (yellow, red, and blue areas in (e), respectively), a time-course change in cortical activation can be observed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Typical examples of the time-course event-related desynchronization (ERD) waveforms of the C3, Cz, and C4 channels for all three test conditions: no-mirror visual feedback (MVF) (a), MVF (b), and delayed-MVF (c) conditions. The red circles mark the points where the mu power amplitude decreased from or increased to the relative peak and was lower than the reference level in response to the button press or MVF. a ERD mainly occurred after the button press. b ERD occurred earlier and with significantly larger amplitude in response to MVF compared to that observed with no MVF. c ERD reappeared when delayed MVF was provided around 2 s after the button press
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Averaged overall event-related desynchronization (ERD) areas (n = 18) with error bars (standard error) for the three test conditions (no mirror visual feedback [MVF]: green; MVF: blue, and delayed MVF: red) for the C3, Cz, and C4 channels, respectively. *Overall ERD areas of this test condition are significantly higher than the areas of the previous test condition for the same EEG channel. The overall ERD areas of the delayed-MVF condition are obviously larger than the areas for the no-MVF condition for all channels (all P < 0.001, not shown in the figure)

References

    1. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain. 2009;132:1693–710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp135.
    1. Altschuler EL, Hu J. Mirror therapy in a patient with a fractured wrist and no active wrist extension. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008;42:110–1. doi: 10.1080/02844310701510355.
    1. Lamont K, Chin M, Kogan M. Mirror box therapy: seeing is believing. Explore (NY) 2011;7:369–72. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.08.002.
    1. Smorenburg AR, Ledebt A, Deconinck FJ, Savelsbergh GJ. Practicing a matching movement with a mirror in individuals with spastic hemiplegia. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:2507–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.001.
    1. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DM, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999;353:2035–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4.
    1. Deconinck FJ, Smorenburg AR, Benham A, Ledebt A, Feltham MG, Savelsbergh GJ. Reflections on mirror therapy: a systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;29:349–56. doi: 10.1177/1545968314546134.
    1. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sutbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Koseoglu F, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:393–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162.
    1. Stevens JA, Stoykov ME. Simulation of bilateral movement training through mirror reflection: a case report demonstrating an occupational therapy technique for hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:59–66. doi: 10.1310/GCFE-QA7A-2D24-KHRU.
    1. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14:S103–9. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832.
    1. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A, Binkofski F, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007;36(Suppl 2):164–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043.
    1. Hamzei F, Lappchen CH, Glauche V, Mader I, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Functional plasticity induced by mirror training: the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:484–96. doi: 10.1177/1545968311427917.
    1. Matsuda T, Watanabe S, Kuruma H, Murakami Y, Watanabe R, Senou A. A comparison of three bimanual coordinations: an fMRI study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2009;21:85–92. doi: 10.1589/jpts.21.85.
    1. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1076–83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.10.020.
    1. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2390–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2390.
    1. Giraux P, Sirigu A. Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity. Neuroimage. 2003;20(Suppl 1):107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024.
    1. Murray CD, Pettifer S, Howard T, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Kulkarni J, et al. The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1465–9. doi: 10.1080/09638280601107385.
    1. Sato K, Fukumori S, Matsusaki T, Maruo T, Ishikawa S, Nishie H, et al. Nonimmersive virtual reality mirror visual feedback therapy and its application for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: an open-label pilot study. Pain Med. 2010;11:622–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00819.x.
    1. Matthys K, Smits M, Van der Geest JN, Van der Lugt A, Seurinck R, Stam HJ, et al. Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:675–81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.571.
    1. Funase K, Tabira T, Higashi T, Liang N, Kasai T. Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett. 2007;419:108–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.025.
    1. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ, van der Geest JN, Bussmann JB, et al. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:393–8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134.
    1. van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:831–40. doi: 10.1080/09638280500534937.
    1. Neuper C, Wortz M, Pfurtscheller G. ERD/ERS patterns reflecting sensorimotor activation and deactivation. Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:211–22. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59014-4.
    1. Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G. Event-related dynamics of cortical rhythms: frequency-specific features and functional correlates. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;43:41–58. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00178-7.
    1. Bae SH, Jeong WS, Kim KY. Effects of mirror therapy on subacute stroke patients’ brain waves and upper extremity functions. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:1119–22. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.1119.
    1. Stepien M, Conradi J, Waterstraat G, Hohlefeld FU, Curio G, Nikulin VV. Event-related desynchronization of sensorimotor EEG rhythms in hemiparetic patients with acute stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2011;488:17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.072.
    1. Pineda JA. The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Res Rev. 2005;50:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005.
    1. Stancak A, Jr, Pfurtscheller G. The effects of handedness and type of movement on the contralateral preponderance of mu-rhythm desynchronisation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;99:174–82. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95701-6.
    1. Hadoush H, Mano H, Sunagawa T, Nakanishi K, Ochi M. Optimization of mirror therapy to excite ipsilateral primary motor cortex. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:617–24.
    1. Rau C, Plewnia C, Hummel F, Gerloff C. Event-related desynchronization and excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex during simple self-paced finger movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1819–26. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00174-3.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110:1842–57. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Berghold A. Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72:250–8. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90250-2.
    1. Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Progress Neurobiol. 2005;75:309–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001.
    1. Barton GJ, De Asha AR, van Loon EC, Geijtenbeek T, Robinson MA. Manipulation of visual biofeedback during gait with a time delayed adaptive virtual mirror box. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:101. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-101.
    1. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW, McNair NA. Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cognitive Brain Res. 2004;19:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001.
    1. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW. Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiol. 2004;41:152–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00129.x.
    1. Schwerin S, Dewald JP, Haztl M, Jovanovich S, Nickeas M, MacKinnon C. Ipsilateral versus contralateral cortical motor projections to a shoulder adductor in chronic hemiparetic stroke: implications for the expression of arm synergies. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185:509–19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1169-8.
    1. Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA. Evidence for bilateral innervation of certain homologous motoneurone pools in man. J Physiol. 1994;475:217–27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020063.
    1. Wasaka T, Kakigi R. Conflict caused by visual feedback modulates activation in somatosensory areas during movement execution. Neuroimage. 2012;59:1501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.024.
    1. Wang J, Fritzsch C, Bernarding J, Krause T, Mauritz KH, Brunetti M, et al. Cerebral activation evoked by the mirror illusion of the hand in stroke patients compared to normal subjects. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33:593–603.
    1. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237–51.
    1. Urgesi C, Moro V, Candidi M, Aglioti SM. Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7942–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1289-06.2006.
    1. Bastiaansen MC, Bocker KB, Brunia CH, de Munck JC, Spekreijse H. Event-related desynchronization during anticipatory attention for an upcoming stimulus: a comparative EEG/MEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:393–403. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00537-X.
    1. Bastiaansen MC, Brunia CH. Anticipatory attention: an event-related desynchronization approach. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;43:91–107. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00181-7.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C. Movement and ERD/ERS. In: Jahanshahi M, Hallett M, editors. The Bereitschaftspotential : movement-related cortical potentials. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 191–206.
    1. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Krausz G. Functional dissociation of lower and upper frequency mu rhythms in relation to voluntary limb movement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1873–9. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00428-4.
    1. Keinrath C, Wriessnegger S, Muller-Putz GR, Pfurtscheller G. Post-movement beta synchronization after kinesthetic illusion, active and passive movements. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;62:321–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.06.001.
    1. Deiber MP, Caldara R, Ibanez V, Hauert CA. Alpha band power changes in unimanual and bimanual sequential movements, and during motor transitions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1419–35. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00536-3.
    1. Formaggio E, Storti SF, Boscolo Galazzo I, Gandolfi M, Geroin C, Smania N, et al. Modulation of event-related desynchronization in robot-assisted hand performance: brain oscillatory changes in active, passive and imagined movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-24.
    1. Touzalin-Chretien P, Ehrler S, Dufour A. Dominance of vision over proprioception on motor programming: evidence from ERP. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:2007–16. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp271.
    1. Touzalin-Chretien P, Dufour A. Motor cortex activation induced by a mirror: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:19–23. doi: 10.1152/jn.90260.2008.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever