Daytime Variation in Serum Progesterone During the Mid-Luteal Phase in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment

Lise Haaber Thomsen, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Claus Yding Andersen, Peter Humaidan, Lise Haaber Thomsen, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Claus Yding Andersen, Peter Humaidan

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether mid-luteal serum progesterone (P4) exhibits significant fluctuations during a 12-h daytime period in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to explore whether the extent of these fluctuations could impact the interpretation of luteal progesterone levels in a clinical setting.

Design: Explorative pilot study.

Setting: Public hospital-based fertility unit.

Patients: Ten women undergoing IVF treatment.

Intervention: Seven days after oocyte pick-up, patients underwent frequent repeated blood sampling (every 60 min for 12 h and during two of these hours, every 15 min). Serum samples were analyzed for progesterone, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone (LH).

Main outcome measures: Daytime fluctuations in s-progesterone and s-estradiol.

Results: There was a significant positive correlation between median P4 levels and the magnitude of P4 variations-women with median P4 < 60 nmol/l had clinically stable P4 levels throughout the day, while patients with median P4 > 250 nmol/l exhibited periodic P4 peaks of several hundred nanomoles per liter. These endogenous P4 fluctuations were observed irrespective of the type of stimulation protocol or mode of triggering of final oocyte maturation and despite the fact that LH was under the detection limit at the time of measurement. Simultaneously, large fluctuations were seen in s-estradiol.

Conclusion: Monitoring of early to mid-luteal P4 levels in IVF cycles may be valuable in the planning of individualized luteal phase support in the attempt to increase reproductive outcomes. The prerequisite for luteal phase monitoring is, however, that the validity of a single measured P4 value is reliable. We show for the first time, that a single P4 measurement in the low progesterone patient quite accurately reflects the corpus luteum function and that the measurement can be used to detect IVF patients with a need of additional exogenous luteal P4 administration.

Keywords: daytime variation; in vitro fertilization; luteal phase; serum estradiol; serum progesterone.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual mid-luteal serum profiles of progesterone over a 12-h interval in 10 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Daytime variation in mid-luteal s-progesterone and s-LH in patient #2. Median P4 = 283 nmol/l. Maximal variation P4/12 h = 265 nmol/l. (B) Daytime variation in mid-luteal s-progesterone and s-estradiol in patient #2. Median E2 = 3,471 pmol/l. Maximal variation E2/12 h = 1,481 pmol/l.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maximum absolute variation in s-progesterone = P4 maximum − P4 minimum (nmol/l) in 10 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Spearman’s r = 0.9273, p = 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time for maximum P4 concentration (acrophase) in 10 women undergoing IVF treatment. As seen, five women had their P4 acrophase before noon and five after noon. The same pattern was seen for P4 nadir.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Daytime variation in mid-luteal s-progesterone and s-estradiol in patient #10. Median P4 = 161 nmol/l, median E2 = 3,606 pmol/l. (B) Daytime variation in mid-luteal s-progesterone and s-estradiol in patient #1. Median P4 = 89 nmol/l, median E2 = 659 pmol/l.

References

    1. Wiltbank MC, Salih SM, Atli MO, Luo W, Bormann CL, Ottobre JS, et al. Comparison of endocrine and cellular mechanisms regulating the corpus luteum of primates and ruminants. Anim Reprod (2012) 9(3):242–59.
    1. Rossmanith WG, Laughlin GA, Mortola JF, Yen SS. Secretory dynamics of oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) during periods of relative pituitary LH quiescence in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (1990) 32(1):13–23.10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb03745.x
    1. Soules MR, Clifton DK, Steiner RA, Cohen NL, Bremner WJ. The corpus luteum: determinants of progesterone secretion in the normal menstrual cycle. Obstet Gynecol (1988) 71(5):659–66.
    1. Humaidan P, Bungum L, Bungum M, Hald F, Agerholm I, Blaabjerg J, et al. Reproductive outcomes using a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) for luteolysis and follicular synchronization in poor responder IVF/ICSI patients treated with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Reprod Biomed Online (2005) 11(6):679–84.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61685-9
    1. Humaidan P, Ejdrup Bredkjaer H, Westergaard LG, Yding Andersen C. 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin administered at oocyte retrieval rescues the luteal phase when gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used for ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril (2010) 93(3):847–54.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.042
    1. Yding Andersen C, Vilbour Andersen K. Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options. Reprod Biomed Online (2014) 28(5):552–9.10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.012
    1. Blake EJ, Norris PM, Dorfman SF, Longstreth J, Yankov VI. Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductive-aged female subjects. Fertil Steril (2010) 94(4):1296–301.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.014
    1. Kisicki JC. Pharmacokinetic Study of Three Dosage Strengths of COL-1620 with Natural Progesterone. Columbia Research Laboratories; Data on file. Crinone Product Monograph (2008). Avaliable from:
    1. Colburn WA. Pharmacokinetic Study of 90 mg Strength of COL-1620 with Natural Progesterone, B.I.D. Columbia Research Laboratories; Data on file. Crinone Product Monograph (2008). Avaliable from:
    1. Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Alsbjerg B, Erb K, Mikkelsen AL, Elbaek HO, et al. GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients. Hum Reprod (2013) 28(9):2511–21.10.1093/humrep/det249
    1. Niemann H, Sacher B, Elsaesser F. Pregnancy rates relative to recipient plasma progesterone levels on the day of nonsurgical transfer of frozen/thawed bovine embryos. Theriogenology (1985) 23(4):631–9.10.1016/0093-691X(85)90197-9
    1. Nogueira MF, Melo DS, Carvalho LM, Fuck EJ, Trinca LA, Barros CM. Do high progesterone concentrations decrease pregnancy rates in embryo recipients synchronized with PGF2alpha and eCG? Theriogenology (2004) 61(7–8):1283–90.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.07.012
    1. Yovich JL, Conceicao JL, Stanger JD, Hinchliffe PM, Keane KN. Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement. Reprod Biomed Online (2015) 31(2):180–91.10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.005
    1. Labarta E, Mariani G, Holtmann N, Celada P, Remohi J, Bosch E. Low serum progesterone on the day of embryo transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in oocyte donation cycles after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study. Hum Reprod (2017) 32(12):2437–42.10.1093/humrep/dex316
    1. Filicori M, Butler JP, Crowley WF, Jr. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest (1984) 73(6):1638–47.10.1172/JCI111370
    1. Veldhuis JD, Christiansen E, Evans WS, Kolp LA, Rogol AD, Johnson ML. Physiological profiles of episodic progesterone release during the midluteal phase of the human menstrual cycle: analysis of circadian and ultradian rhythms, discrete pulse properties, and correlations with simultaneous luteinizing hormone release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1988) 66(2):414–21.10.1210/jcem-66-2-414
    1. Reame N, Sauder SE, Kelch RP, Marshall JC. Pulsatile gonadotropin secretion during the human menstrual cycle: evidence for altered frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1984) 59(2):328–37.10.1210/jcem-59-2-328
    1. Tavaniotou A, Albano C, Smitz J, Devroey P. Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix. Hum Reprod (2001) 16(4):663–7.10.1093/humrep/16.4.663
    1. Fujimoto VY, Clifton DK, Cohen NL, Soules MR. Variability of serum prolactin and progesterone levels in normal women: the relevance of single hormone measurements in the clinical setting. Obstet Gynecol (1990) 76(1):71–8.
    1. Rossmanith WG, Laughlin GA, Mortola JF, Johnson ML, Veldhuis JD, Yen SS. Pulsatile cosecretion of estradiol and progesterone by the midluteal phase corpus luteum: temporal link to luteinizing hormone pulses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1990) 70(4):990–5.10.1210/jcem-70-4-990
    1. Wuttke W, Theiling K, Hinney B, Pitzel L. Regulation of steroid production and its function within the corpus luteum. Steroids (1998) 63(5–6):299–305.10.1016/S0039-128X(98)00037-3
    1. Bah MM, Acosta TJ, Pilawski W, Deptula K, Okuda K, Skarzynski DJ. Role of intraluteal prostaglandin F(2alpha), progesterone and oxytocin in basal and pulsatile progesterone release from developing bovine corpus luteum. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat (2006) 79(3–4):218–29.10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.01.002
    1. Fisch B, Margara RA, Winston RM, Hillier SG. Cellular basis of luteal steroidogenesis in the human ovary. J Endocrinol (1989) 122(1):303–11.10.1677/joe.0.1220303
    1. Maybin JA, Duncan WC. The human corpus luteum: which cells have progesterone receptors? Reproduction (2004) 128(4):423–31.10.1530/rep.1.00051
    1. Devoto L, Fuentes A, Kohen P, Cespedes P, Palomino A, Pommer R, et al. The human corpus luteum: life cycle and function in natural cycles. Fertil Steril (2009) 92(3):1067–79.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1745
    1. van den Driesche S, Smith VM, Myers M, Duncan WC. Expression and regulation of oestrogen receptors in the human corpus luteum. Reproduction (2008) 135(4):509–17.10.1530/REP-07-0427
    1. Maas S, Jarry H, Teichmann A, Rath W, Kuhn W, Wuttke W. Paracrine actions of oxytocin, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and estradiol within the human corpus luteum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1992) 74(2):306–12.10.1210/jc.74.2.306
    1. Friden BE, Hagstrom H, Lindblom B, Sjoblom P, Wallin A, Brannstrom M, et al. Cell characteristics and function of two enriched fraction of human luteal cells prolonged culture. Mol Hum Reprod (1999) 5(8):714–9.10.1093/molehr/5.8.714
    1. Ohara A, Mori T, Taii S, Ban C, Narimoto K. Functional differentiation in steroidogenesis of two types of luteal cells isolated from mature human corpora lutea of menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1987) 65(6):1192–200.10.1210/jcem-65-6-1192
    1. Jones GS. Corpus luteum: composition and function. Fertil Steril (1990) 54(1):21–6.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53630-9
    1. Tannus S, Burke Y, McCartney CR, Kol S. GnRH-agonist triggering for final oocyte maturation in GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles induces decreased LH pulse rate and amplitude in early luteal phase: a possible luteolysis mechanism. Gynecol Endocrinol (2017) 5:1–5.10.1080/09513590.2017.1318275
    1. Jones GS. Luteal phase defect: a review of pathophysiology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (1991) 3(5):641–8.10.1097/00001703-199110000-00003
    1. Wolfram J, Siegberg R, Apter D, Alfthan H, Stenman UH, Laatikainen T. Pulsatility of serum-luteinizing hormone during hyperstimulation with clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril (1989) 52(5):817–20.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53045-3
    1. Devroey P, Palermo G, Bourgain C, Van Waesberghe L, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC. Progesterone administration in patients with absent ovaries. Int J Fertil (1989) 34(3):188–93.
    1. Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Fox J, Boyd C, Kaplan P, Navot D. Luteal phase deficiency after completely normal follicular and periovulatory phases. Fertil Steril (1989) 52(6):919–23.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53152-5

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever