Página Nct de ensaios clínicos

Summary
EudraCT Number:2006-001608-35
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:HUM-04-80
National Competent Authority:Belgium - FPS Health-DGM
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:Completed
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2006-11-16
Trial results
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedBelgium - FPS Health-DGM
A.2EudraCT number2006-001608-35
A.3Full title of the trial
TREATMENT OF SCIATICA BY ADALIMUMAB INJECTION : A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL.
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberHUM-04-80
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of SponsorDr. Valérie gangji
B.1.3.4CountryBelgium
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
B.4.2Country
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisation
B.5.2Functional name of contact point
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Information not present in EudraCT
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.1Product nameHUMIRA
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.8INN - Proposed INNAdalimumab
D.3.9.1CAS number 331731-18-1
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number40
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.8 Information on Placebo
D.8 Placebo: 1
D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for injection
D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
To determine the efficacy of adalimumab in disc herniation-induced sciatica in a controlled randomised double blind pilot study.
MedDRA Classification
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.2Version 8.1
E.1.2Level LLT
E.1.2Classification code 10039674
E.1.2Term Sciatica
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
The primary outcome will be: success or failure of the treatment at 1 week. The patient will perceived the overall degree of improvement or deterioration on a descriptive four
item scale (recovery, marked improvement, slight improvement, or worse). The patient rating recovery or marked improvement will be considered as a success; and rating slight improvement or worse will considered as a failure.
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
Secondary outcomes : VAS, Oswestry questionnaire
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
1. Age > 18 year and < 70 year
2. first episode of unilateral sciatica or recurrence lasting for a minimum of 15 days and a maximum of 90 days.
3. Sciatica defined as :
- Presence of intermittent (for at least 8 hours) or constant unilateral pain radiating below the knee
- Signs of nerve root irritation: a positive-straight leg test or nerve root compression (motor, sensory or reflex deficits).
- Evidence of herniated nucleus pulposus on lumbar spine CT or MRI at the level corresponding to the symptoms and clinical findings.
4. VAS leg > 30 mm
5. Oswestry Score > 20
6. If female, subject is either not of childbearing potential, defined as postmenopausal for at least 1 year or surgically sterile (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy), or is of childbearing potential and practicing one of the following methods of birth control throughout the study and for 150 days after study completion:
·condoms, sponge, foams, jellies, diaphragm or intrauterine device (IUD) contraceptives (oral or parenteral) for 3 months prior to study drug administration)
·a vasectomized partner

7. Subject must be able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol.

8. Subject must be able and willing to self-administer SC injections or has available qualified person(s) to administer SC injections.
E.4Principal exclusion criteria
1.Symptoms of cauda equida syndrome
2.CT or MRI showed evidence of nerve root compression from causes other than a herniated nucleus pulposus
3.patient had received a corticosteroids epidural for the current episode in the preceding 90 days
4.allergy to local anaesthetics
5.previous low back surgery
6.work accident, out of work for more than one year
7.Medical history of tuberculosis. Positive PPD/intradermal reaction or an abnormal chest x-ray suggestive of active TB.
8.History of malignancy other than a successfully treated non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
9.Immuno-compromised conditions or history of HIV.
10.History of listeriosis, history of histoplasmosis, active TB, persistent chronic or active infections requiring treatment with intravenous (iv) antibiotics, iv antivirals, or iv antifungals within 30 days or oral antibiotics, oral antivirals, or oral antifungals within 14 days prior to study entry
11.History of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease
12.Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study. There should be at least a 150-day period between the last dose of study drug and either conception or initiation of breast-feeding in women of childbearing potential.
13.Poorly controlled medical condition, such as uncontrolled diabetes with documented history of recurrent infections, unstable ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, recent cerebrovascular accidents and any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at risk by participation in the protocol.
14.Investigational biological and chemical agents within 5 half-lives prior to Screening visit or within a longer or shorter time period depending on the mechanism of action.
15.History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse
16.The investigator considers the subject, for any reason, to be unacceptable for study participation.
17.Patient who has a known blood coagulation disorder
18.Medical history of demyelinating disease
19.Medical history of systemic lupus erythematosus
20.Presence of acute or chronic Hepatitis B or a history of Hepatitis C.
E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
The primary outcome will be: success or failure of the treatment at 1 week. The patient will perceived the overall degree of improvement or deterioration on a descriptive four
item scale (recovery, marked improvement, slight improvement, or worse). The patient rating recovery or marked improvement will be considered as a success; and rating slight improvement or worse will considered as a failure.
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis No
E.6.2Prophylaxis No
E.6.3Therapy Yes
E.6.4Safety Yes
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
E.6.8Bioequivalence No
E.6.9Dose response No
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
E.6.13Others Information not present in EudraCT
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
E.7.1.1First administration to humans Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.3Other Information not present in EudraCT
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled Yes
E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
E.8.1.2Open No
E.8.1.3Single blind No
E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
E.8.1.6Cross over No
E.8.1.7Other No
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
E.8.2.3Other No
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
Last visit last patient
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
F.1.1.1In Utero Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Information not present in EudraCT
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers Information not present in EudraCT
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state50
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2006-12-01
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2006-11-13
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
3
Se inscrever