High-Fidelity Simulation and Longitudinal Outcomes in Novice Nurses (HFS-NOVA) (HFS-NOVA)
Divergent Trajectories of Clinical Performance and Psychological Outcomes in Novice Nurses Following High-Fidelity Simulation: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study
This study examined whether high-fidelity simulation (HFS) training - a realistic, hands-on learning method using advanced patient mannequins - can improve both technical skills and psychological well-being in newly graduated nurses.
Seventy novice nurses at a tertiary medical centre in Taiwan participated in a structured HFS session focused on airway crisis management. Six outcomes were measured at three time points: before training (T1), immediately after training (T2), and three months later (T3). These outcomes included: airway management knowledge, clinical performance, learning attitude, self-efficacy (confidence in clinical abilities), nursing learning resilience (ability to cope with professional challenges), and psychological well-being.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Вмешательство/лечение
Подробное описание
A prospective longitudinal repeated-measures design was employed. The HFS programme was developed and implemented in accordance with INACSL Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice. The curriculum used SimMan 3G (Laerdal Medical) and followed a three-phase structure: pre-briefing (10 minutes), scenario phase involving acute respiratory failure management (20 minutes), and structured debriefing using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) framework (10 minutes).
Statistical analysis used Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE) with identity link function and exchangeable working correlation matrix to model longitudinal trajectories while accounting for repeated measures and participant attrition.
The study was conducted at Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, between March and December 2025. IRB approval was obtained prior to data collection (No. C202505016, 18 March 2025).
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Действительный)
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
Места учебы
-
-
-
Taipei, Тайвань, 114
- Tri-Service General Hospital
-
-
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
- Взрослый
- Пожилой взрослый
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Newly registered nursing license with 0 to 12 months of clinical experience
- Enrolled in the mandatory 2-year New Graduate Nurse (NGN) residency programme at Tri-Service General Hospital
- Willing and able to complete all three data collection phases (T1, T2, and T3)
- Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior extensive critical care clinical experience
- Participation in a similar airway management simulation programme within the preceding 6 months
- Inability to participate in the full simulation session due to scheduling or health reasons
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Исследования в области здравоохранения
- Распределение: Н/Д
- Интервенционная модель: Одногрупповое задание
- Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: HFS Intervention Group
All enrolled novice nurses received a standardised 40-minute high-fidelity simulation session focused on airway crisis management, comprising pre-briefing, scenario, and structured debriefing phases.
|
A standardised 40-minute HFS session using SimMan 3G (Laerdal Medical) comprising three phases: (1) Pre-briefing (10 min): environmental orientation, fiction contract, and psychological safety emphasis.
(2) Scenario phase (20 min): each participant acted as primary decision-maker for a patient with acute respiratory failure, performing assessment, oxygen titration, airway suctioning, and care escalation.
(3) Structured debriefing (10 min): facilitator-led debrief using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) framework.
Другие имена:
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Performance
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2, approximately 1 day after T1), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using the 40-item Clinical Performance Checklist (CPC) scored by two independent raters (Cohen's κ = 0.88).
Higher scores indicate better procedural performance.
Range: 0-40.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2, approximately 1 day after T1), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
|
Self-Efficacy
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using a 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale measuring confidence in managing clinical airway challenges (Cronbach's α = 0.922).
Range: 10-40.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Airway Management Knowledge
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using a 15-item multiple-choice test developed by a three-expert panel (KR-20 = 0.78).
Range: 0-15.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
|
Learning Attitude
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using a 10-item Simulation Learning Attitude Scale (Cronbach's α = 0.955).
Range: 10-50.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
|
Nursing Learning Resilience
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using the 15-item Nursing Learning Resilience Scale (NLRS; Cronbach's α = 0.930).
Range: 15-75.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
|
Psychological Well-Being
Временное ограничение: Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Assessed using the 18-item Chinese Short Form of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB-SF; Cronbach's α = 0.952).
Six subscales: positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance.
Range: 18-90.
|
Baseline (T1), immediately post-simulation (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Следователи
- Главный следователь: Wu-Chien Chien, Ph.D., Tri-Service General Hospital
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Действительный)
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- TSGH-HFS-2025
- TSGH-D-114201 (Другой номер гранта/финансирования: Tri-Service General Hospital)
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .