Internet-delivered mindfulness for people with depression and chronic pain following spinal cord injury: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial

Jasmine Heath Hearn, Katherine Anne Finlay, Jasmine Heath Hearn, Katherine Anne Finlay

Abstract

Study design: Between-subjects, randomized controlled feasibility study.

Objectives: Populations with reduced sensory and motor function are at increased risk of depression, anxiety and pain, and may be less geographically mobile. This study explored the efficacy and feasibility of web-based mindfulness training for people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting: UK community sample.

Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to an 8-week online mindfulness intervention (N = 36), or to internet-delivered psychoeducation (N = 31). Depression symptom severity was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, quality of life (QoL), pain perception, pain catastrophizing and mindfulness. Measures were taken before (T1), at completion of, (T2), and 3 months following the intervention (T3).

Results: At T2, ten participants discontinued mindfulness training, and five discontinued psychoeducation. Dropouts were of significantly older age. Nine participants were lost to follow-up. Mindfulness reduced depression significantly more than psychoeducation at T2 (mean difference = -1.50, 95% CI [-2.43, -0.58]) and T3 (mean difference = -2.34, 95% CI [-3.62, -1.10]). Anxiety, pain unpleasantness and catastrophizing were significantly reduced compared with psychoeducation. Total mindfulness scores, and all facets of mindfulness except observing were significantly higher following mindfulness training. At follow-up, reductions in anxiety and catastrophizing persisted.

Conclusions: Internet-delivered mindfulness training offers unique benefits and is viable for people with reduced sensory awareness. Future work should explore the feasibility of combined education and mindfulness training. The use of brief interventions shows promise in maximizing participant retention.

References

    1. J Psychosom Res. 2007 Mar;62(3):297-300
    1. PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S51-S58
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;(11):CD009177
    1. Psychol Rep. 2016 Dec;119(3):586-607
    1. J Behav Med. 1997 Dec;20(6):589-605
    1. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8
    1. Spinal Cord. 2004 May;42(5):302-7
    1. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):197-207
    1. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45
    1. Pain. 2003 Dec;106(3):337-45
    1. Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):147-57
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Feb;72(1):31-40
    1. BMC Neurol. 2014 Jan 17;14:15
    1. Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):517-27
    1. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
    1. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 24;11(2):e13
    1. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;6(6):537-59
    1. J Rehabil Med. 2006 May;38(3):172-80
    1. Psychol Health Med. 2006 Feb;11(1):80-90
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):133-40
    1. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010 Nov;49(Pt 4):455-71
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2203-11
    1. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Mar;62(3):373-86
    1. Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):973-988
    1. Rehabil Psychol. 2013 May;58(2):158-65
    1. J Health Psychol. 2011 Mar;16(2):374-91
    1. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):63-78

Source: PubMed

Подписаться