Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcome following single thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study

S Neal, S Morin, M Werner, N-A Gueye, P Pirtea, G Patounakis, R Scott Jr, L Goodman, S Neal, S Morin, M Werner, N-A Gueye, P Pirtea, G Patounakis, R Scott Jr, L Goodman

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the prevalence of ultrasound (US) features of adenomyosis in an infertile population undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF), (2) to define the inter- and intrarater agreement of three-dimensional (3D) US assessment of adenomyosis, and (3) to evaluate sonographic features of adenomyosis with respect to pregnancy outcome following transfer of a single thawed euploid blastocyst.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Subjects scheduled to undergo a single thawed euploid blastocyst transfer between April and December 2017 at a large IVF center were eligible for inclusion. Enrolled subjects underwent endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer. 3D-US was performed on the day prior to embryo transfer, with images stored for subsequent evaluation. Subjects then underwent transfer of a single thawed euploid blastocyst, and pregnancy outcomes were collected. All 3D-US volumes were de-identified and reviewed independently by five reproductive endocrinologists/infertility specialists with expertise in gynecological US for the presence of seven sonographic features of adenomyosis: global uterine enlargement, myometrial wall asymmetry, heterogeneous echogenicity, irregular junctional zone, myometrial cysts, fan-shaped shadowing and ill-defined myometrial lesions. Adenomyosis was considered to be present if the majority of the reviewers noted at least one of the seven sonographic features. Inter- and intrarater agreement was evaluated using Fleiss's kappa. Clinical and cycle characteristics of subjects with and those without adenomyosis were compared. The primary outcome of interest was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to account for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 648 subjects were included. The prevalence of adenomyosis on US was 15.3% (99/648). On retrospective chart review, very few patients with adenomyosis had symptoms. The inter- and intrarater agreement amongst five independent specialists conducting the 3D-US assessments of adenomyosis were poor (κ = 0.23) and moderate (κ = 0.58), respectively. Subjects with adenomyosis were older (37.1 vs 35.9 years, P = 0.02) and more likely to undergo a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist downregulation protocol when compared with those without adenomyosis (12.1% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02). Clinical pregnancy (80.0% vs 75.0%) and live birth (69.5% vs 66.5%) rates were similar between the groups. When adjusting for potential confounders, there was no difference in the rate of clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.47 (95% CI, 0.85-2.56)), miscarriage (aOR, 1.3 (95% CI, 0.62-2.72)) or live birth (aOR, 1.28 (95% CI, 0.78-2.08)) between subjects with and those without adenomyosis. No individual sonographic marker of adenomyosis was predictive of pregnancy outcome.

Conclusions: The inter-rater agreement of 3D-US assessment of adenomyosis is poor. Furthermore, sonographic markers of adenomyosis in asymptomatic patients may not be associated with altered pregnancy outcome following transfer of a single thawed euploid blastocyst. These findings suggest that routine screening for asymptomatic adenomyosis in an unselected infertile patient population undergoing frozen embryo transfer may not be warranted. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: IVF outcome; adenomyosis; frozen embryo transfer; three-dimensional ultrasound.

© 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Campo S, Campo V, Benagiano G. Adenomyosis and infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 24: 35-46.
    1. Brosens J, de Souza N, Barker F, Paraschos T, Winston R. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 102: 471-474.
    1. Meredith S, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz A. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 107.e1-6.
    1. Sun YL, Wang CB, Lee CY, Wun TH, Lin P, Lin YH, Tseng CC, Chen CH, Tseng CJ. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 40-44.
    1. Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Albrecht L, LaMonica R, Proffer A, Zupi E, Luciano AA. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 803-810.
    1. Munro M. Classification and reporting system for adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27: 296-308.
    1. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone F, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installé AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D'Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brölmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 284-298.
    1. Naftalin J, Hoo W, Nunes N, Mavrelos D, Nicks H, Jurkovic D. Inter- and intraobserver variability in three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial-myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 587-91.
    1. Lazzeri L, Morosetti G, Centini G, Monti G, Zupi E, Piccione E, Exacoustos C. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement. Fertil Steril 2018; 110: 1154-1161.
    1. Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 657-666.
    1. Salim R, Riris S, Saab W, Abramov B, Khadum I, Serhal P. Adenomyosis reduces pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25: 273-277.
    1. Stanekova V, Woodman RJ, Tremellen K. The rate of euploid miscarriage is increased in the setting of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Open 2018; 2018: hoy011.
    1. Sharma S, Bathwal S, Agarwal N, Chattopadhyay R, Saha I, Chakravarty B. Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38: 13-21.
    1. Thalluri V, Tremellen K. Ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis has a negative impact on successful implantation following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3487-3492.
    1. Mavrelos D, Holland TK, O'Donovan O, Khalil M, Ploumpidis G, Jurkovic D, Khalaf Y. The impact of adenomyosis on the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35: 549-554.
    1. Martínez-Conejero JA, Morgan M, Montesinos M, Fortuño S, Meseguer M, Simón C, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A. Adenomyosis does not affect implantation, but is associated with miscarriage in patients undergoing oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 943-950.
    1. Costello MF, Lindsay K, McNally G. The effect of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilisation and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 158: 229-234.
    1. Benaglia L, Cardellicchio L, Leonardi M, Faulisi S, Vercellini P, Paffoni A, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29: 606-611.
    1. Mijatovic V, Florijn E, Halim N, Schats R, Hompes P. Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 62-65.
    1. Puente JM, Fabris A, Patel J, Patel A, Cerrillo M, Requena A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Adenomyosis in infertile women: Prevalence and the role of 3D ultrasound as a marker of severity of the disease. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14: 60.
    1. Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 576-582.
    1. Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Ernst E, Dueholm M. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38: 750-760.
    1. Rasmussen C, van den Bosch T, Exacoustos C. Intra- and inter-rater agreement describing myometrial lesions using morphologic uterus sonographic assessment: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 2673-2683.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться