Degludec hospital trial: A randomized controlled trial comparing insulin degludec U100 and glargine U100 for the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes

Rodolfo J Galindo, Francisco J Pasquel, Priyathama Vellanki, Radica Alicic, David W Lam, Maya Fayfman, Alexandra L Migdal, Georgia M Davis, Saumeth Cardona, Maria A Urrutia, Citlalli Perez-Guzman, Karla Walkiria Zamudio-Coronado, Limin Peng, Katherine R Tuttle, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Rodolfo J Galindo, Francisco J Pasquel, Priyathama Vellanki, Radica Alicic, David W Lam, Maya Fayfman, Alexandra L Migdal, Georgia M Davis, Saumeth Cardona, Maria A Urrutia, Citlalli Perez-Guzman, Karla Walkiria Zamudio-Coronado, Limin Peng, Katherine R Tuttle, Guillermo E Umpierrez

Abstract

Aims: Limited data exist about the use of insulin degludec in the hospital. This multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, prospective randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of insulin degludec-U100 and glargine-U100 for the management of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In total, 180 general medical and surgical patients with an admission blood glucose (BG) between 7.8 and 22.2 mmol/L, treated with oral agents or insulin before hospitalization were randomly allocated (1:1) to a basal-bolus regimen using degludec (n = 92) or glargine (n = 88), as basal and aspart before meals. Insulin dose was adjusted daily to a target BG between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean hospital daily BG between groups.

Results: Overall, the randomization BG was 12.2 ± 2.9 mmol/L and glycated haemoglobin 84 mmol/mol (9.8% ± 2.0%). There were no differences in mean daily BG (10.0 ± 2.1 vs. 10.0 ± 2.5 mmol/L, p = .9), proportion of BG in target range (54·5% ± 29% vs. 55·3% ± 28%, p = .85), basal insulin (29.6 ± 13 vs. 30.4 ± 18 units/day, p = .85), length of stay [median (IQR): 6.7 (4.7-10.5) vs. 7.5 (4.7-11.6) days, p = .61], hospital complications (23% vs. 23%, p = .95) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <3.9 mmol/L (17% vs. 19%, p = .75) or <3.0 mmol/L (3.7% vs. 1.3%, p = .62) between degludec and glargine.

Conclusion: Hospital treatment with degludec-U100 or glargine-U100 is equally safe and effective for the management of hyperglycaemia in general medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: degludec; glargine; hospital care; hypoglycaemia; inpatient management.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported by DLW, MF, GD, SC, MAU, KWZC, BA, MCPG, and LP.

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Study Flow (Participant Disposition)
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Daily Blood Glucose Levels During Hospitalization in Patients treated with Degludec U100 and Glargine U100. Figure 2 A: Mean daily blood glucose concentrations Figure 2B: Mean blood glucose before meals and bedtime Data presented as mean ± SD.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться