Comparison of the curative antimalarial activities and toxicities of primaquine and its d and l isomers

L H Schmidt, S Alexander, L Allen, J Rasco, L H Schmidt, S Alexander, L Allen, J Rasco

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to determine whether either d-primaquine or l-primaquine has sufficient advantage over primaquine to warrant evaluation for curative activity in human volunteers infected with Plasmodium vivax. It was found: (i) that the capacities of the isomers and the racemate to cure infections with Plasmodium cynomolgi in rhesus monkeys were essentially identical; (ii) that the subacute toxicities of the isomers and racemate for this monkey were qualitatively the same, but that l-primaquine was three to five times as toxic as d-primaquine and at least twice as toxic as primaquine; and (iii) that the acute single-dose toxicities of the isomers for mice were not only qualitatively different, but that the d isomer was at least four times as toxic as l-primaquine. Since previous appraisals of curative activity and tolerability of 8-aminoquinolines in rhesus monkeys have correlated well with appraisals in human volunteers, attention was focused on results acquired with these test subjects. The relevant evaluations showed that d-primaquine had a therapeutic index at least twice that of primaquine. If this advantage carries over to man, problems that now complicate routine use of primaquine might be obviated. Therefore, a critical comparison of d-primaquine and primaquine in human volunteers seems indicated.

References

    1. J Clin Invest. 1948 May;27(3 Pt 2):34-45
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1960;22:621-31
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1963 Jul;12:494-503
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1955 Mar;4(2):208-16
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1953 Nov;2(6):977-82
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969 Jul;18(4):495-9
    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1952 Aug 23;149(17):1558-62
    1. J Natl Malar Soc. 1950 Dec;9(4):285-92
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977 May;26(3):356-72
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977 May;26(3):562-3
    1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1953 Nov;2(6):949-57

Source: PubMed

Подписаться