Role of joint afferents in motor control exemplified by effects on reflex pathways from Ib afferents

A Lundberg, K Malmgren, E D Schomburg, A Lundberg, K Malmgren, E D Schomburg

Abstract

1. Intracellular recording from motoneurones to hind limb muscles in the cat was used to investigate the effect of volleys in the posterior nerve to the knee joint on motoneurones and on transmission from Ib afferents. 2. Volleys in the joint nerve facilitate transmission in disynaptic and trisynaptic inhibitory and excitatory reflex pathways from Ib afferents. It is postulated that facilitation, which appears at a strength of 1.5 times threshold, is evoked, not by Ib afferents which 'contaminate' the joint nerve, but by afferents from joints receptors. 3. T;e time course of facilitation of the disynaptic Ib i.p.s.p.s in motoneurones indicates that these joint afferents have disynaptic connexions with the interneurones of the Ib inhibitory pathway. 4. A brief description is given of synaptic effects evoked in motoneurones by graded electrical stimulation of the posterior nerve to the knee joint. At low stimulus strength the effects may be evoked via interneurones of Ib reflex pathways, but some results suggest that other interneuronal paths are utilized as well. Somewhat higher strengths, but occasionally less than 2 times threshold, produce later synaptic effects presumably mediated by reflex paths from the flexor reflex afferents; it does not seem likely that the contributory afferents in the joint nerve have nociceptive function. 5. It is suggested that impulses from impulses from joint receptors can influence tension regulation from Golgi tendon organs; if these receptors are activated in the terminal phase of the movement they may contribute a purposeful decrease of tension. It is pointed out that joint receptors may have an important role in motor regulation by their effects on interneurones of the different neuronal systems controlling motoneurones.

References

    1. Am J Physiol. 1950 Apr 1;161(1):133-41
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1966;1(4):338-58
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960 Oct 31;50:167-74
    1. J Physiol. 1957 Sep 30;138(2):227-52
    1. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(1):23P-24P
    1. J Physiol. 1977 Mar;265(3):763-80
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1976 Dec 22;26(5):521-40
    1. Brain Res. 1976 Dec 10;118(1):115-8
    1. J Physiol. 1968 Jan;194(1):201-23
    1. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):317-35
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1969;7(4):365-91
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1967 Jul-Aug;70(3):369-88
    1. Physiol Rev. 1976 Jul;56(3):465-501
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1974 Feb 15;19(3):248-70
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972 Mar;84(3):430-2
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1972;15(1):54-78
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Nov;38(6):1448-63
    1. Brain Res. 1975 Apr 4;87(1):81-4
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Apr;75(4):614-30
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1966 Jul-Aug;67(3):373-86
    1. Arch Ital Biol. 1966 Mar;104(1):86-97
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1963 Dec;59:424-37

Source: PubMed

Подписаться