Long-term safety and efficacy of gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Jodi Y So, Jaron Nazaroff, Chinonso V Iwummadu, Nicki Harris, Emily S Gorell, Shivali Fulchand, Irene Bailey, Daniel McCarthy, Zurab Siprashvili, M Peter Marinkovich, Jean Y Tang, Albert S Chiou, Jodi Y So, Jaron Nazaroff, Chinonso V Iwummadu, Nicki Harris, Emily S Gorell, Shivali Fulchand, Irene Bailey, Daniel McCarthy, Zurab Siprashvili, M Peter Marinkovich, Jean Y Tang, Albert S Chiou

Abstract

Background: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare, devastating blistering genodermatosis caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene, which encodes for type VII collagen and is necessary for dermal-epidermal adhesion and integrity. Disease manifestations include severe and debilitating wounds, aggressive squamous cell carcinomas, and premature death; however, there are currently no approved therapies. This Phase 1/2a, open-label study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts (EB-101) for chronic RDEB wounds.

Methods: Autologous keratinocytes were harvested from participants with severe RDEB, transduced with a retrovirus containing the full-length COL7A1 gene, and grown into 5 × 7 cm (35 cm2) sheets. Gene-corrected keratinocyte sheets were then transplanted onto chronic RDEB wounds present for ≥ 12 weeks.

Results: Seven adult participants with severe RDEB were grafted with six sheets each (42 total sheets) onto wounds and followed for a mean of 5.9 years (range 4-8 years). Long-term improvements in wound healing and symptoms were observed. At year five, 70% (21/30) of treated sites demonstrated ≥ 50% wound healing compared to baseline by investigator global assessment. No sites with ≥ 50% wound healing were painful or pruritic, compared to 67% (6/9) of sites with < 50% wound healing (p < 0.001) at year five. Grafts were well-tolerated throughout long-term follow-up. No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported over a mean of 5.9 years of follow-up. No persistent systemic autoimmunity against type VII collagen or replication-competent retrovirus infections were identified, and no participants developed squamous cell carcinomas related to treatment during long-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Treatment with EB-101 appears safe and efficacious, and produces long-term improvements in wound healing, pain, and itch for RDEB patients. Results from the Phase 3 randomized controlled trial are forthcoming.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01263379. Registered December 15, 2010. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01263379.

Keywords: Blistering diseases; Clinical trials; Epidermolysis bullosa; Gene therapy; Genetic diseases; Genodermatoses; Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Conflict of interest statement

ASC, JYT, and MPM are clinical investigators for Abeona Therapeutics, Inc and Phoenix Tissue Repair. JYT is a stockholder and consultant to BridgeBio and PellePharm, Inc. ASC and JYT are also clinical investigators for Biomendics, LLC. MPM is also a clinical investigator for WINGS, Castle Creek Pharmaceuticals, and Krystal Biotech.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical wound healing by investigator global assessment (IGA) of chronic wounds treated with gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts[a]. [a] A red box indicates < 50% wound healing compared to baseline, a yellow box indicates 50–74% wound healing compared to baseline, and a green box indicates ≥ 75% wound healing compared to baseline. A grey box indicates that the follow-up visit was conducted virtually due to the ongoing SARS-CoV 2 pandemic, which precluded Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of wound healing. A striped box indicates a missed appointment. A white box indicates prospective dates. Wounds A-F were chronic wounds. Wound Z was an induced wound. Control wounds are not included. [b] Subjects 4 and 5 died prior to their year six and year five visits, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative photographs of chronic open RDEB wounds before and after treatment with gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts. Individual 5 × 7 cm gene-corrected grafts denoted by a letter and delineated by blue dots and lines. A One graft was placed on a small wound on subject 2’s back. Investigator global assessment showed 50–74% wound healing compared to baseline at year one, and ≥ 75% healing at years four and five. B One graft applied to a small wound on subject 2’s chest demonstrated ≥ 75% healing through year four, 50–74% at year five, and ≥ 75% from year six onwards. C Four adjacent grafts were placed on subject 7’s upper back. ≥ 75% healing was sustained through year five. D Six contiguous grafts were applied to large, confluent wounds on subject 6’s back. From year one, all showed 50–74% or < 50% healing, likely due to early graft loss
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient-reported presence of any pain or itch at chronic RDEB wounds before and after treatment. Summary of presence of (A) pain (binary option: yes/no) and (B) itch (binary option: yes/no) at chronic, open RDEB wounds before and after treatment with 5 × 7 cm gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient-reported pain and itch at treated chronic RDEB wounds, stratified by wound healing. Summary of treated chronic RDEB wounds with (A) pain (binary option: yes/no) and (B) itch (binary option: yes/no), stratified by wounds demonstrating < 50% wound healing and ≥ 50% wound healing as determined by investigator global assessment (IGA). Statistically significant differences in pain and itch by graft site healing were estimated by Fisher’s exact test

References

    1. Marinkovich MP, et al. Inherited epidermolysis bullosa. In: Kang S, Amagai M, Bruckner AL, Enk AH, Margolis DJ, McMichael AJ, et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology. 9. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019.
    1. Marinkovich MP, Keene DR, Rimberg CS, Burgeson RE. Cellular origin of the dermal-epidermal basement membrane. Dev Dyn. 1993;197(4):255–267. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001970404.
    1. Keene DR, Sakai LY, Lunstrum GP, Morris NP, Burgeson RE. Type VII collagen forms an extended network of anchoring fibrils. J Cell Biol. 1987;104(3):611–621. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.611.
    1. Tang JY, Marinkovich MP, Lucas E, Gorell E, Chiou A, Lu Y, et al. A systematic literature review of the disease burden in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01811-7.
    1. Shinkuma S, McMillan JR, Shimizu H. Ultrastructure and molecular pathogenesis of epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29(4):412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.01.010.
    1. Marinkovich MP, Tang JY. Gene therapy for epidermolysis bullosa. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(6):1221–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.11.036.
    1. Siprashvili Z, Nguyen NT, Bezchinsky MY, Marinkovich MP, Lane AT, Khavari PA. Long-term type VII collagen restoration to human epidermolysis bullosa skin tissue. Hum Gene Ther. 2010;21(10):1299–1310. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.023.
    1. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, von Kalle C, Schmidt M, Le Deist F, Wulffraat N, McIntyre E, et al. A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(3):255–256. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200301163480314.
    1. Shirley JL, de Jong YP, Terhorst C, Herzog RW. Immune responses to viral gene therapy vectors. Mol Ther. 2020;28(3):709–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.01.001.
    1. Siprashvili Z, Nguyen NT, Gorell ES, Loutit K, Khuu P, Furukawa LK, et al. Safety andwound outcomes following genetically corrected autologous epidermal grafts in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. JAMA. 2016;316(17):1808–1817. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15588.
    1. Eichstadt S, Barriga M, Ponakala A, Teng C, Nguyen NT, Siprashvili Z, et al. Phase 1/2a clinical trial of gene-corrected autologous cell therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. JCI Insight. 2019;4(19):e130554. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.130554.
    1. Khaddour K, Gorell ES, Dehdashti F, Tang JY, Ansstas G. Induced remission of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Case Rep Oncol. 2020;13(2):911–915. doi: 10.1159/000508933.
    1. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Li KP, Suchindran C. Epidermolysis bullosa and the risk of life-threatening cancers: the national EB registry experience, 1986–2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(2):203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.035.
    1. Solis DC, Gorell ES, Teng C, Barriga M, Nazaroff J, Li S, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with increased wound size in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(3):704–706. doi: 10.1111/pde.14576.
    1. Solis DC, Teng C, Gorell ES, Barriga M, Nazaroff J, Li S, et al. Classification of 2 distinct wound types in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a retrospective and cohort natural history study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(5):1296–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.118.
    1. Cianfarani F, Zambruno G, Castiglia D, Odorisio T. Pathomechanisms of altered wound healing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(7):1445–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.03.003.
    1. Bruckner-Tuderman L, Mellerio JE. Wound healing in epidermolysis bullosa. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(5):e193–e195. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15572.
    1. Kirby JS. Patient-reported outcomes in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(1):97–98. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1559.
    1. Rashidghamat E, Mellerio J. Management of chronic wounds in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: challenges and solutions. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2017;4:45–54. doi: 10.2147/CWCMR.S97537.
    1. Adni T, Martin K, Mudge E. The psychosocial impact of chronic wounds on patients with severe epidermolysis bullosa. J Wound Care. 2012;21(11):528–538. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.11.528.
    1. Eng VA, Solis DC, Gorell ES, Choi S, Nazaroff J, Li S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a global cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(5):1161–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.028.
    1. Gorell ES, Wolstencroft PW, de Souza MP, Murrell DF, Linos E, Tang JY. Financial burden of epidermolysis bullosa on patients in the United States. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37(6):1198–1201. doi: 10.1111/pde.14340.
    1. Hirsch T, Rothoeft T, Teig N, Bauer JW, Pellegrini G, De Rosa L, et al. Regeneration of the entire human epidermis using transgenic stem cells. Nature. 2017;551(7680):327–332. doi: 10.1038/nature24487.
    1. Kueckelhaus M, Rothoeft T, De Rosa L, Yeni B, Ohmann T, Maier C, et al. Transgenic epidermal cultures for junctional epidermolysis bullosa—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(24):2264–2270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108544.
    1. De Rosa L, Secone Seconetti A, De Santis G, Pellacani G, Hirsch T, Rothoeft T, et al. Laminin 332-dependent YAP dysregulation depletes epidermal stem cells in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. Cell Rep. 2019;27(7):2036–2049.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.055.
    1. Rousselle P, Lunstrum GP, Keene DR, Burgeson RE. Kalinin: An epithelium-specific basement membrane adhesion molecule that is a component of anchoring filaments. J Cell Biol. 1991;114(3):567–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.3.567.
    1. Gorell ES, Nguyen N, Siprashvili Z, Marinkovich MP, Lane AT. Characterization of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa for collagen VII therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(3):821–823. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13737.
    1. Lapiere JC, Woodley DT, Parente MG, Iwasaki T, Wynn KC, Christiano AM, et al. Epitope mapping of type VII collagen. Identification of discrete peptide sequences recognized by sera from patients with acquired epidermolysis bullosa. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(4):1831–1939. doi: 10.1172/JCI116774.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration . Testing of retroviral vector-based human gene therapy products for replication competent retrovirus during product manufacture and patient follow-up: guidance for industry. MD: Silver Spring; 2020.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться