A Prospective, Open-Label, Observational, Postmarket Study Evaluating VYC-17.5L for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Over 12 Months

Gerhard Sattler, Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston, Helga Van Den Elzen, Cornelius Van Der Walt, Myooran Nathan, Julia Kolodziejczyk, Graeme Kerson, Benjeev Dhillon, Gerhard Sattler, Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston, Helga Van Den Elzen, Cornelius Van Der Walt, Myooran Nathan, Julia Kolodziejczyk, Graeme Kerson, Benjeev Dhillon

Abstract

Background: VYC-17.5L (17.5 mg/mL hyaluronic acid, 0.3% lidocaine) is a dermal filler intended for deep dermis injection for the treatment of skin depressions.

Objective: To evaluate 12-month effectiveness and safety of VYC-17.5L for the treatment of moderate/severe nasolabial folds (NLFs).

Methods: Subjects ≥18 years old with moderate/severe NLFs were recruited (N = 70). Injected volume was aimed at achieving optimum correction; top-up treatment was given at 2 weeks if needed. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed change in NLF severity over 12 months using the validated photonumeric NLF Severity Scale. Secondary endpoints included investigator- and subject-assessed satisfaction and safety. Adverse events judged to be more severe or prolonged than routinely observed were recorded.

Results: Sixty-five subjects completed study requirements. Mean volume injected was 3.0 ± 1.0 mL for both NLFs combined. Significant improvement was maintained in investigator-assessed NLF severity at 12 months, and investigators and subjects reported high satisfaction with VYC-17.5L throughout the study. Two unexpected adverse events were reported: (1) redness, swelling, and decreased sensitivity (resolved after 4 days) and (2) swelling (resolved after 48 hours); neither event was serious or life threatening.

Conclusion: VYC-17.5L is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of moderate to severe NLFs for 1 year.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean investigator-assessed NLF severity by time point for right and left NLFs. Significant differences between baseline and each time point are shown (p < .001***). NLF, nasolabial fold.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Subject satisfaction mean scores stratified by time point. Significant differences were assessed between baseline and each time point as appropriate (p < .05*, p < .01**, p < .001***).

References

    1. Pallua N, Wolter TP. A 5-year assessment of safety and aesthetic results after facial soft-tissue augmentation with polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid): a prospective multicenter study of 251 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1797–804.
    1. Tzikas TL. A 52-month summary of results using calcium hydroxylapatite for facial soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 2008;34(Suppl 1):S9–S15.
    1. Guinot C, Malvy DJM, Ambroisine L, Latreille J, et al. Relative contribution of intrinsic vs extrinsic factors to skin aging as determined by a validated skin age score. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1454–60.
    1. De Arruda LH, Rocha FT, Rocha A. Studying the satisfaction of patients on the outcome of an aesthetic dermatological filler treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol 2008;7:246–50.
    1. De Aquino MS, Haddad A, Ferreira LM. Assessment of quality of life in patients who underwent minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 2013;37:497–503.
    1. Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Gal TJ. Blinded evaluation of the effects of hyaluronic acid filler injections on first impressions. Dermatol Surg 2010;36(Suppl 3):1866–73.
    1. Bernardin A, Pierre S, Pather S, Martinez A, et al. Vycross: an innovative dermal filler technology. Anti-Aging Medicine European Congress; May 31, 2013; Paris, France.
    1. Bartus CL, Sattler G, Hanke CW. The tower technique: a novel technique for the injection of hyaluronic acid fillers. J Drugs Dermatol 2011;10:1277–80.
    1. Sattler G, Birgit W. Tower technique of filler injection. In: Carruthers J, Carruthers A, Dover JS, Alam M, editors. Soft Tissue Augmentation: Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series (3rd ed). Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
    1. Muhn C, Rosen N, Solish N, Bertucci V, et al. The evolving role of hyaluronic acid fillers for facial volume restoration and contouring: a Canadian overview. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2012;5:147–58.
    1. Hee CK, Garrett ST, Narurkar V, Bernardin A, et al. Rheological properties and in vivo performance characteristics of soft tissue fillers. Dermatol Surg 2015;41(Suppl 1):S373–381.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться