Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness

Moritz Zimmermann, Andreas Ender, Gustav Egli, Mutlu Özcan, Albert Mehl, Moritz Zimmermann, Andreas Ender, Gustav Egli, Mutlu Özcan, Albert Mehl

Abstract

Objectives: Indirect CAD/CAM restorations can be fabricated using both subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology. This study investigated the fracture load of crowns fabricated from three particle-filled composite CAD/CAM materials and one 3D-printed composite material.

Materials and methods: Lava Ultimate, Cerasmart and Brilliant Crios were used as particle-filled composite CAD/CAM material and els-3D Harz as 3D-printed composite material. For each group, crowns with three different material thicknesses (0.5/1.0/1.5 mm) were fabricated. Control group was composed of ceramic-based CAD/CAM materials e.max CAD and Enamic. Totally, n = 180 crowns were fabricated and adhesively seated on SLA fabricated dies. Thermomechanical loading and fracture testing were performed. The data for fracture loading force were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed with multiple comparisons by post hoc Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results: In contrast to ceramics, all particle-filled composite crowns with 0.5-mm thickness survived fatigue testing. Forces varied statistically significantly. Brilliant Crios showed highest maximum loading force with 1580.4 ± 521.0 N (1.5 mm). Two-way ANOVA indicated that both the material and the thickness affected the fracture load (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM materials may have advantageous material characteristics compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials for minimal restoration thicknesses.

Clinical relevance: Composite-based CAD/CAM materials may offer new possibilities in minimally invasive restorative treatment concepts.

Keywords: 3D printing; CAD/CAM; CEREC; Hybrid ceramic; Lithium disilicate ceramic; Particle-filled composite; Resin nano ceramic.

References

    1. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jun;81(6):652-61
    1. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Sep-Oct;13(5):387-91
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May;87(5):503-9
    1. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Jun;22(3):241-9
    1. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(1):13-29
    1. Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Nov-Dec;5(6):550-7
    1. Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):125-32
    1. Dent Mater. 2006 Jan;22(1):29-36
    1. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Jan 01;10(1):33-40
    1. Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):328-36
    1. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Oct;2(5):502-11
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Sep;104(3):149-57
    1. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12(spe):26-36
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Apr;105(4):217-26
    1. Dent Mater. 2012 Apr;28(4):433-41
    1. Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):502-11
    1. J Dent. 2012 Jul;40(7):571-6
    1. Dent Mater. 2012 Jul;28(7):777-82
    1. Dent Mater. 2012 Aug;28(8):e99-109
    1. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Apr;20:113-25
    1. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):492-501
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(2):173-81
    1. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(8):953-60
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Oct;110(4):264-73
    1. Dent Mater. 2014 May;30(5):e99-e111
    1. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;26(6):382-93
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):878-85
    1. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):299-308
    1. Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):201-10
    1. J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1232-4
    1. J Dent. 2015 Jun;43(6):742-9
    1. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):227-36
    1. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Oct;18(5):984-992
    1. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):499-509
    1. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;23(6):629-36
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):397-403
    1. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):162-169
    1. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):551-558
    1. Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):73-81
    1. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):254-256
    1. Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):99-109
    1. Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):84-98
    1. Dent Mater J. 2017 Jan 31;36(1):88-94
    1. J Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;27(8):694-699
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):384-389
    1. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Oct;74:245-250
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jun;119(6):954-958
    1. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2017 Nov 22;5:2050313X17741015
    1. Dent Mater. 2018 Jun;34(6):910-921
    1. Dent Mater. 1994 May;10(3):172-7
    1. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Sep-Oct;6(5):462-7
    1. Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):103-10
    1. Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Jul-Aug;11(4):333-9

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться