Development and acceptability testing of ready-to-use supplementary food made from locally available food ingredients in Bangladesh
Tahmeed Ahmed, Nuzhat Choudhury, M Iqbal Hossain, Nattapol Tangsuphoom, M Munirul Islam, Saskia de Pee, Georg Steiger, Rachel Fuli, Shafiqul A M Sarker, Monira Parveen, Keith P West Jr, Parul Christian, Tahmeed Ahmed, Nuzhat Choudhury, M Iqbal Hossain, Nattapol Tangsuphoom, M Munirul Islam, Saskia de Pee, Georg Steiger, Rachel Fuli, Shafiqul A M Sarker, Monira Parveen, Keith P West Jr, Parul Christian
Abstract
Background: Inadequate energy and micronutrient intake during childhood is a major public health problem in developing countries. Ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) made of locally available food ingredients can improve micronutrient status and growth of children. The objective of this study was to develop RUSF using locally available food ingredients and test their acceptability.
Methods: A checklist was prepared of food ingredients available and commonly consumed in Bangladesh that have the potential of being used for preparing RUSF. Linear programming was used to determine possible combinations of ingredients and micronutrient premix. To test the acceptability of the RUSF compared to Pushti packet (a cereal based food-supplement) in terms of amount taken by children, a clinical trial was conducted among 90 children aged 6-18 months in a slum of Dhaka city. The mothers were also asked to rate the color, flavor, mouth-feel, and overall liking of the RUSF by using a 7-point Hedonic Scale (1 = dislike extremely, 7 = like extremely).
Results: Two RUSFs were developed, one based on rice-lentil and the other on chickpea. The total energy obtained from 50 g of rice-lentil, chickpea-based RUSF and Pushti packet were 264, 267 and 188 kcal respectively. Children were offered 50 g of RUSF and they consumed (mean ± SD) 23.8 ± 14 g rice-lentil RUSF, 28.4 ± 15 g chickpea based RUSF. Pushti packet was also offered 50 g but mothers were allowed to add water, and children consumed 17.1 ± 14 g. Mean feeding time for two RUSFs and Pushti packet was 20.9 minutes. Although the two RUSFs did not differ in the amount consumed, there was a significant difference in consumption between chickpea-based RUSF and Pushti packet (p = 0.012). Using the Hedonic Scale the two RUSFs were more liked by mothers compared to Pushti packet.
Conclusions: Recipes of RUSF were developed using locally available food ingredients. The study results suggest that rice-lentil and chickpea-based RUSF are well accepted by children.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01553877. Registered 24 January 2012.
Figures
References
- NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, Macro International; 2011. p. 18.
- Ahmed T, Bhutta ZA, Goel KM. In: Hutchison’s Pediatrics. Goel KM, Gupta DK, editor. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2012. Nutrition: Protein-energy malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies in childhood.
- Kimmons JE, Dewey KG, Haque E, Chakraborty J, Osendarp SJM, Brown KH. Low nutrient intakes among infants in rural Bangladesh are attributable to low intake and micronutrient density of complementary foods. J Nutr. 2005;135:444–51.
- Arsenault JE, Yakes EA, Hossain MB, Islam MM, Ahmed T, Hotz C, Lewis B, Rahman AS, Jamil KM, Brown KH. The current high prevalence of dietary zinc inadequacy among children and women in rural Bangladesh could Be substantially ameliorated by zinc biofortification of rice. J Nutr. 2010;140:1683–90.
- Yakes EA, Arsenault JE, Islam MM, Hossain MB, Ahmed T, German JB, Gillies LA, Rahman AS, Drake C, Jamil KM, Lewis BL, Brown KH. Intakes and breast-milk concentrations of essential fatty acids are low among Bangladeshi women with 24-48-month-old children. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:1660–1670.
- Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HP, Shekar M. Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371:417–40.
- Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, Webb P, Lartey A, Black RE. The Lancet Nutrition Intervention Review Group, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013;282:452–477.
- Adu-Afarwuah S, Lartey A, Zeilani M, Dewey KG. Acceptability of lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) among Ghanaian infants and pregnant or lactating women. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7:344–56.
- Bisimwa G, Owino VO, Bahwere P, Dramaix M, Donnen P, Dibari F, Collins S. Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a soybean-maize-sorghum–based ready-to-use complementary food paste on infant growth in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:1157–64.
- Phuka J, Ashorn U, Ashorn P, Zeilani M, Cheung YB, Dewey KG, Manary M, Maleta K. Acceptability of three novel lipid-based nutrient supplements among Malawian infants and their caregivers. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7:368–77.
- Smith VE. Linear programming models for the determination of palatable human diets. J Farm Econ. 1959;31:272–83.
- Briend A, Ferguson AE, Darmon N. Local food price analysis by linear programming: a new approach to assess the economic value of fortified food supplements. Food Nutr Bull. 2001;22:184–189.
- Young SL, Blanco I, Hernandez-Cordero S, Pelto GH, Neufeld LM. Organoleptic properties, ease of use, and perceived health effects are determinants of acceptability of micronutrient supplements among poor Mexican women. J Nutr. 2010;140:605–11.
- Albaum G. The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version. J Mark Res Soc. 1997;39:331–48.
Source: PubMed